Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🚀احداث البحر الاحمر - Red Sea🔥🫆

Channel

🚀احداث البحر الاحمر - Red Sea🔥🫆

@Red_S_ea

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,933subscribers

+683 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309992423
TypeChannel
Username@Red_S_ea
Description🔴القناة الأولى و الرسمية لمتابعة كل مايتعلق ب أخبار #البحر_الاحمر و #اليمن واحداث #غزة ميدانياً
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Red_S_ea

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SeaNews1/268657 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC@Red_S_ea/95014 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.0072 seconds
@SeaNews1/269397 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC@Red_S_ea/95075 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC1.0017 minutes
@Red_S_ea/101835 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC@SeaNews1/299474 Nov 2026, 13:57 UTC1.0011 minutes
@SeaNews1/299665 Nov 2026, 20:54 UTC@Red_S_ea/101932 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 02:14 UTC1.005.3 hours
@Red_S_ea/102061 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC@SeaNews1/300067 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC1.009 minutes
@SeaNews1/300388 Nov 2026, 18:26 UTC@Red_S_ea/102240 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC1.0017 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@SeaNews110 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0029 minutes@SeaNews1 (6–4)
@Nasr_Amer19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 minutes@Nasr_Amer1 (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 15 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 139 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,2506,9336,591.56 August 2026 — 6,250 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,265 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,309 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,324 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,339 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,341 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,346 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,344 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,346 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,354 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,392 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,498 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,586 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,622 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,681 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,748 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,843 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,885 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,892 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,909 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,922 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,921 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,924 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,928 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,926 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,933 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net +683. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,148–7,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:366,933+7
6 Nov 2026, 16:346,926-2
3 Nov 2026, 13:096,928+4
31 Oct 2026, 12:286,924+3
28 Oct 2026, 06:196,921-1
24 Oct 2026, 23:456,922+13
21 Oct 2026, 14:396,909+17
18 Oct 2026, 08:066,892+7
15 Oct 2026, 04:486,885+42
12 Oct 2026, 03:596,843+95
5 Oct 2026, 17:576,748+67
28 Sept 2026, 05:016,681+59
18 Sept 2026, 10:576,622+36
13 Sept 2026, 20:176,586+88
10 Sept 2026, 11:186,498+106
5 Sept 2026, 10:416,392+38
1 Sept 2026, 04:456,354+8
29 Aug 2026, 01:446,346+2
25 Aug 2026, 20:286,344-2
23 Aug 2026, 06:166,346first reading

Engagement

344 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.46%
avg views ÷ 6,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
656
232 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
232
of 344 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 229 of 232 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held344 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total152,166
Reactions total3,946
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,700
Videos
≈11,000
Links
≈269

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 15m
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,162 reactions across 340 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,53335.4%
👍1,13815.9%
❤1,08215.1%
🤣88712.4%
🫡78210.9%
😡3775.26%
💔731.02%
👎700.977%
👀570.796%
👌510.712%
😁360.503%
😢300.419%
💯260.363%
😱190.265%
⚡10.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 340 of the 344 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 26 of 232 posts held from the last 30 days (11.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026

😂ترامب: إن الإيقاف الوطني للرحلات الجوية لا يبدو مرتبطاً بهجوم سيبراني أو بالذكاء الاصطناعي😂

🤣3👍1

Signed الهمداني🫆

14 Nov 2026, 05:45 UTC173 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ما يحدث في أمريكا من توقيف للرحلات الجوية شيء خيال 👍🏻👍🏻

👍10❤1

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:42 UTC838 views38 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

يااااربي لك الحمد المعنوياااات عالية وانتصارااات كبيرة بفضل الله تسجيل صوتي لأحد المقاتلين من ألوية العمالقة يحدث عن خذلان قوات طارق وقوات درع الوطن للقوات الجنوبية في المضاربة ورأس العارة وانسحابها من كافة مواقعها وترك القوات الجنوبية تواجه مصيرها منفردة .

🔥29❤6🫡3

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:32 UTC861 views34 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ماء البحر مالح

🔥33❤1

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:30 UTC870 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026

متحدث القوات المسلحة اليمنية العميد يحيى سريع: نفذت قواتنا المسلحة عمليتين عسكريتين نوعيتين الأولى استهدفت مطار خالد الدولي في عاصمة العدو السعودي الرياض بطائرة مسيرة وحققت هدفَها بنجاح بفضل الله. والأخرى استهدفت محطة الضخ رقم 3 بخط شرق غرب شرق الرياض بطائرتين مسيرتين وحققت العملية هدفها بنجاح بفضل الله.

🔥19🫡2❤1

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:15 UTC865 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

متحدث القوات المسلحة اليمنية العميد يحيى سريع نفذت القوات المسلحة عملية استهداف لتحشيدات العدو السعودي في منطقة الطوال بـ #جيــزان بصاروخين بالستيين وكانت الإصابات دقيقة ومباشرة بفضل الله وخلفت عشرات القتلى والجرحى بينهم #سودانيون.

🔥20❤4🫡4

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC870 views36 reactionsread 14 November 2026

‏⁧ #عاجل ⁩ ‏تم نقل قائد الفرقة الثانية عمالقة وقائد المنطقة العسكرية الرابعة، العميد ⁧ #حمدي_شكري ⁩ الصبيحي، إلى السعودية عبر مطار عدن الدولي، بعد تدهور حالته الصحية، برفقة عدد من الضباط السعوديين، من بينهم الضابط بدر الحربي . ‏⁧ #عادل_الحسني ⁩

🔥32❤2👍2

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:04 UTC885 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026

متحدث القوات المسلحة اليمنية العميد يحيى سريع استهدفت قواتنا المسلحة تحشيدات العدو السعودي التابعة للضابط السعودي فارس الشمري شرقي محافظة الجوف بصاروخين بالستيين وكانت الإصابة دقيقة بفضل الله وخلفت قتلى وجرحى في صفوفهم.

🔥16❤4🫡4

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC873 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026

متحدث القوات المسلحة اليمنية العميد يحيى سريع: استهدفت القوات المسلحة تحشيدات العدو السعودي التابعة للضابط السعودي بدر الحربي في منطقة خرز وخور عميرة بمحافظة لحج بعدد من الصواريخ الباليستية وكانت الإصابة مباشرة وخلفت عددا كبيرا من القتلى والجرحى.

🔥17🫡4❤2

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 19:57 UTC863 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

متحدث القوات المسلحة اليمنية العميد يحيى سريع: تمكنت قواتنا المسلحة بفضل الله من استهداف مخازن الأسلحة التابعة للعدو السعودي في معسكر رأس عباس بمحافظة عدن بعدد من الصواريخ الباليستية والطائرات المسيرة وكانت الإصابة دقيقة بفضل الله وأدت إلى احتراقها.

🔥21🫡4❤3

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 19:57 UTC860 views36 reactionsread 14 November 2026

قريبا ستسمعون اخبار تشفي صدور قوم مؤمنين اكثروا من ذكر الله

❤34👍2

Signed الهمداني🫆

13 Nov 2026, 19:47 UTC866 views31 reactionsread 14 November 2026

تـرقبوا

🫡26❤5

Signed الهمداني🫆

Showing the 12 most recent of 344 posts we hold for @Red_S_ea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Red_S_ea edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

محمد علي الحوثي
@Mohammadlhouthi · 33,378
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
إزاحة للستار وكشف للحقائق 🔍📓
@Azaha_Setar · 22,429
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 September 2026
قناة الشهيد طه المداني
@AbuHasanAlMadani · 21,775
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 23 September 2026
النبأ
@Naba_yem · 40,324
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
قناة المنشد محمد الداهيه / زوامل محمد الداهية / محمد الداهيه / شيلات محمد الداهية / محمدالداهيه
@Mohammedaldahya · 22,180
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
شبكة الفرقان
@alforgan_net · 33,161
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
🎥 فيديو الإعلام الشعبي اليمني
@PopularMediaYEV · 97,252
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
زوامل قناف المقبلي الرسمية
@qanafalmaqbli1 · 118,710
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
قناة المنشد عبد الخالق النبهان / زوامل عبد الخالق النبهان / قناة عبد الخالق النبهان
@qergg1 · 23,400
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
شاهد - قناة المسيرة الفضائية
@AlmasirahVideos · 64,813
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
محمد عبدالسلام الناطق الرسمي لانصار الله
@abdulsalamsalah · 34,042
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
جامعة القرآن الكريم والعلوم الاكاديمية
@Alqurankarym12 · 22,778
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026
زوامل المنشد محمد المحفدي
@MohammedAlmhfde · 19,332
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
قناة زوامل عيسى الليث 2026
@zwamlAllaitw · 133,714
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
كـلــمـات راقــت لــي 🌷
@kllmatt · 33,278
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🚀احداث البحر الاحمر - Red Sea🔥🫆” (@Red_S_ea), 6,933 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Red_S_ea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.