Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Andrology and reconstructive urology

Channel

Andrology and reconstructive urology

@Reconstructive_Urology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,512subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342481691
TypeChannel
Username@Reconstructive_Urology
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Reconstructive_Urology

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4772,5122,494.57 August 2026 — 2,479 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,479 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,485 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,497 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,498 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,503 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,510 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,512 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 40 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,472–2,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 17:382,512+2
12 Sept 2026, 09:562,510+7
8 Sept 2026, 07:182,503+5
3 Sept 2026, 10:072,498+1
27 Aug 2026, 14:242,497+2
24 Aug 2026, 11:232,495+10
21 Aug 2026, 01:252,485+8
17 Aug 2026, 18:372,477-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:482,479no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:352,479first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 41s
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3856.7%
1623.9%
😱57.46%
🔥34.48%
🆒22.99%
11.49%
👏11.49%
🤯11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Reconstructive_Urology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTCviews —

Andrology and reconstructive urology pinned «Приветствую! Информация по каналу по категориям подписчиков: Врачи-урологи: ⁃ Есть есть желающие публиковать свои материалы результатов лечения пациентов в формате «До/После», добавляю в администраторы канала. ⁃ Если нет желания, времени, но есть интересные…»

6 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC326 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Приветствую! Информация по каналу по категориям подписчиков: Врачи-урологи: ⁃ Есть есть желающие публиковать свои материалы результатов лечения пациентов в формате «До/После», добавляю в администраторы канала. ⁃ Если нет желания, времени, но есть интересные материалы, можете отправить мне @Aleksei_Mk02 , опубликую от Вашего имени. Врачи-урологи поликлиник, частных медицинских центров г. Москвы и Московской област

3👍2🔥1🆒1

2 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC679 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gluteal Compartment Syndrome- The Missing Diagnosis. Case Presentation And Brief Literature Review.

26 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,370 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Осложнение после утолщения полового члена гиалуроновой кислотой. Вводные данные: 26.06.2026 г. — утолщение полового члена гиалуроновой кислотой. Пациент не обрезан. Вводит врач-косметолог (которого нашёл на Авито). 12.07.2026 г. пациент обращается на повторную консультацию, отмечена миграция гиалуроновой кислоты в крайнюю плоть и развитие фимоза. Врач-косметолог принимает решение выполнить обрезание крайней плоти —

👍7😱54🤯1

22 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC≈1,320 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пациент А, 70. Жалобы: затрудненное мочеиспускание, чувство неполного опорожнения мочевого пузыря. Анамнез: 20.02.2024г - Лазерная энуклеация предстательной железы. 12.2024г - внутренняя оптическая уретротомия. С 12.2025г. отметил прогрессирующее ухудшение качества мочеиспускания, что смотивировало к обращению за медицинской помощью. Данные обследования: Урофлоуметрия - Q max -3,2 мл/с УЗИ мочевого пузыря с определе

👍711👏1🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,650 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Используете/авали в своей практике Bulkamid™ Urethral Bulking System? И Ваши отзывы.

  1. Да, активно применяю8%
  2. Да, но перестал(а) использовать0%
  3. Нет, не применял(а)32%
  4. Впервые слышу59%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,500 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Prospective Comparative Analysis between Bulking Agent and Single-Incision Sling Сравнить эффективность, безопасность, влияние на качество жизни и сексуальную функцию двух минимально инвазивных методов лечения стрессового недержания мочи (СНМ) у женщин: · Полиакриламидный гидрогель (Bulkamid®) · Altis® Single Incision Sling 📋 Дизайн и пациенты

5

5 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,120 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1. Bulkamid™ Urethral Bulking System 2. Altis® Single Incision Sling

👍3

23 Jun 2026, 17:23 UTC≈1,640 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Long‐Term Rate of Reoperation After Midurethral Sling Insertion Among Women With Urinary Incontinence: A Population‐Based Study Il Woo Park, Jaeyoung Cho, Mina Kim, Dae‐Sung Kyoung, Sang Hoon Song, Juhyun Park. · Тип исследования: ретроспективная когорта на основе национальной базы данных медицинского страхования Южной Кореи (NHIS). · Выборка: 221 082 женщины старше 20 лет, перенесших MUS (TVT или TOT) по поводу

👍3🔥1🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Reconstructive_Urology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

Используете/авали в своей практике Bulkamid™ Urethral Bulking System? И Ваши отзывы.

  1. Да, активно применяю8%
  2. Да, но перестал(а) использовать0%
  3. Нет, не применял(а)32%
  4. Впервые слышу59%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

УРОЛОГИЯ И МЕДИЦИНА - доктор Гадзиян.
@urolog_mark · 27,443
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Марина •ГИНЕКОЛОГ• г. МАХАЧКАЛА 🔞Мужчинам категорически нельзя! Исключительно женский блог!
@marinamihailovna1 · 21,361
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 September 2026
Urology Books, Guidelines & Videos
@UroResources · 21,285
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Andrology and reconstructive urology” (@Reconstructive_Urology), 2,512 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reconstructive_Urology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.