Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reason Thunder

Channel

Reason Thunder

@ReasonThunder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,265subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002306342088
TypeChannel
Username@ReasonThunder
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ReasonThunder

Growth

1,2591,2721,265.57 August 2026 — 1,263 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,262 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,262 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,259 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,272 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,265 subscribers1,2657 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,257–1,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:061,265-7
13 Aug 2026, 09:031,272+13
10 Aug 2026, 17:411,259-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:481,262no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:081,262-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:271,263first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 1,265 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (18 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total197
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 23s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,023 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 525376410425808307639519.5%
custom 523141569290491705938519.0%
custom 546322631350448796131915.8%
custom 524926762139152272324612.2%
custom 525366148460448006723211.5%
custom 520842756764785271422010.9%
custom 51971545669860276661477.27%
custom 5253868124071024476793.91%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,023reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ReasonThunder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC197 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 НА 6️⃣🎁 1️⃣-25⭐️ 2️⃣-25⭐️ 3️⃣-25 ⭐️ 4️⃣-25⭐️ 5️⃣-25 ⭐️ 6️⃣-25⭐️ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔥 VMS Vyatka moto style 🔥 KITTTCYKI 🔥 Reason Thunder 😁

custom 525366148460448006710

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

16 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC761 views201 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

😋

custom 523141569290491705956custom 520842756764785271435custom 525376410425808307630custom 546322631350448796123custom 524926762139152272322custom 519715456698602766618custom 525366148460448006717

10 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,500 views285 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🥩🥩🥩

custom 520842756764785271456custom 523141569290491705945custom 525376410425808307645custom 525366148460448006742custom 524926762139152272338custom 519715456698602766630custom 546322631350448796129

9 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC950 views186 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На 150 реакций на закину это мясо 🥩 Давно видосов небыло ⚪

custom 524926762139152272341custom 546322631350448796133custom 520842756764785271430custom 523141569290491705925custom 519715456698602766620custom 525376410425808307619custom 525366148460448006718

9 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,280 views200 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 525366148460448006747custom 523141569290491705935custom 519715456698602766628custom 546322631350448796126custom 520842756764785271423custom 524926762139152272321custom 525376410425808307620

5 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,440 views171 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

💕

custom 525376410425808307653custom 523141569290491705931custom 525366148460448006729custom 524926762139152272319custom 520842756764785271416custom 519715456698602766615custom 54632263135044879618

1 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,380 views227 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥

custom 525376410425808307662custom 546322631350448796143custom 523141569290491705933custom 525386812407102447622custom 520842756764785271419custom 524926762139152272318custom 525366148460448006718custom 519715456698602766612

26 Jun 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,100 views199 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥩😍

custom 524926762139152272386custom 523141569290491705935custom 546322631350448796129custom 525366148460448006715custom 525386812407102447612custom 525376410425808307611custom 52084275676478527146custom 51971545669860276665

24 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,070 views128 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥

custom 525376410425808307666custom 523141569290491705930custom 546322631350448796126custom 51971545669860276666

22 Jun 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,060 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥

custom 525376410425808307662custom 520842756764785271431custom 523141569290491705924custom 52538681240710244765custom 51971545669860276663custom 54632263135044879613custom 52492676213915227231custom 52536614846044800671

20 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,060 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😍

custom 523141569290491705966custom 525366148460448006731custom 546322631350448796125custom 52538681240710244765custom 51971545669860276663

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ReasonThunder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,464 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reason Thunder” (@ReasonThunder), 1,265 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReasonThunder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.