Engagement
308 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.47%
- avg views ÷ 10,803 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 699
- 305 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 308
- of 308 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈23,100
- Videos
- ≈1,730
- Links
- ≈7,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
27 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC412 viewsread 27 August 2026 File
🇺🇸 ANOTHER HAPPY USA WINNER! 🏆🔥
He joined VIP today, placed a $30 stake on the matches, and won $28,050! 😱💰
He’s currently on vacation with his future wife, so this win came at the perfect time! 😂🌴🥂
Now he’s already asking for the weekly VIP to continue. 🔥
📩 VIP: @Johnrobart ✅
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC414 viewsread 27 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC418 viewsread 27 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC418 viewsread 27 August 2026 File
🔥 THURSDAY BRINGS ANOTHER VIP WIN! 🏆⚽
💷 £50 ➜ £46,750! 😱💰
Another massive result secured for our VIP members! ✅🔥
🎥 WINNING PROOF AVAILABLE!
Watch the video and see the winning ticket for yourself. 👀🎫
🏆 CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERY VIP MEMBER!
📲 VIP: @Johnrobart ✅
🔄 VIP Group: https://t.me/Johnrobart ✅
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC420 viewsread 27 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC418 viewsread 27 August 2026 Photo
Bᴏᴏᴍ As Exᴘᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ 👍❤️
Cᴏɴɢʀᴀᴛᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴs 🎉
Cʜᴇᴇʀs🥂🍾❤️
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC419 viewsread 27 August 2026 Video
CONFIRM YOUR LIVESCORE NOW!!! 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
LIVESCORE.COM
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC418 viewsread 27 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC420 viewsread 27 August 2026 Video
🎯 BOOM! Another Thursday, another successful VIP result! ✅🔥
The selections delivered to our VIP members ahead of kickoff have now DONE THE JOB! 🏆💰 The ticket is settled, the results are confirmed, and another winning day is officially in the books. 📊✅
💷 Our VIP members trusted the selections, placed their stakes, and now they can celebrate another successful result! 🎉🔥
🎥 WINNING PROOF AVAILABLE! 👀
Check the ticket…
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC420 viewsread 27 August 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC811 viewsread 27 August 2026 Photo
🔥 YESTERDAY’S TESTIMONY DESERVES ANOTHER LOOK! 🏆🇬🇧
Two brothers joined the action and both came out with massive results! 💷⚽
💷 £20 ➜ £74,620
💷 £25 ➜ £93,275
They’ve now chosen to continue with the monthly VIP after seeing the results for themselves. 🔥
Proof + real conversation below. Congratulations once again! 🏆❤️
📩 VIP: @Johnrobart ✅
Signed JOHN ROBART
27 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC808 viewsread 27 August 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
Signed JOHN ROBART
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @Realfixedmatchservice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,138,737 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REAL FIXED MATCHES” (@Realfixedmatchservice), 10,803 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Realfixedmatchservice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.