Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REAL MADRID PAGE

Channel

REAL MADRID PAGE

@RealMadridPage

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,718subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001291543
TypeChannel
Username@RealMadridPage
Description🥇اولین و قدیمی‌ترین کانال رئال مادرید در تلگرام 🎖تاسیس : ۶ مهر ۱۳۹۴ ‌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ‌ ‌⚽️بازی بعدی: 🏆هفته ۱۳ لالیگا 🔰رئال مادرید - سلتاویگو 🗓شنبه، ۳۰ آبان ⏰ساعت ۲۳:۳۰ 🏟ورزشگاه سانتیاگو برنابئو
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealMadridPage

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,71816,79216,7555 August 202614 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 101 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,707–16,803 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 13:1616,718-12
11 Nov 2026, 11:1616,730-6
9 Nov 2026, 19:0916,736+1
8 Nov 2026, 14:0616,735-1
7 Nov 2026, 10:4616,736-1
6 Nov 2026, 11:1516,737-4
5 Nov 2026, 11:0116,741-3
4 Nov 2026, 11:0816,744-1
3 Nov 2026, 12:3116,745+1
2 Nov 2026, 14:4416,744-6
1 Nov 2026, 11:5516,750-4
30 Oct 2026, 10:0616,754-3
29 Oct 2026, 07:3916,757-3
28 Oct 2026, 06:1616,760-1
27 Oct 2026, 08:4616,761+5
26 Oct 2026, 07:4016,756+32
25 Oct 2026, 04:1616,724+4
24 Oct 2026, 05:5916,720-3
23 Oct 2026, 03:1416,723-2
22 Oct 2026, 00:0016,725first reading

Engagement

738 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.09%
avg views ÷ 16,718 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
232 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
232
of 738 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 230 of 232 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held738 (6 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total313,680
Reactions total11,645
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 05:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈102,000
Videos
≈7,770
Links
≈2,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35m 50s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

29,353 reactions across 734 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12,30941.9%
❤‍🔥7,24624.7%
🔥3,86413.2%
👍2,8809.81%
💔1,0173.46%
🤣5081.73%
👎4591.56%
💩3061.04%
🫡2430.828%
🤬1610.548%
🤡1200.409%
🖕680.232%
😁680.232%
🤯610.208%
🤮420.143%
😐10.003%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 734 of the 738 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 738 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 737 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RealMadridPage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 738 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 232 posts held from the last 30 days (3.02%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC1 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🗣خشم روماریو از آنچلوتی: آنچلوتی، دیگر کافی است. وسایلت را جمع کن و بزن به چاک. ➕«آنچلوتی، دیگر بس است. وسایلت را جمع کن و بزن به چاک. هیچ‌کس کارنامه تو را زیر سوال نمی‌برد؛ تو یکی از بهترین مربیانی هستی که دنیای فوتبال به خود دیده، اما همه این‌ها در سطح باشگاهی بوده. در تیم ملی برزیل تا این لحظه هیچ نشانه‌ای از توانایی‌هایت نشان نداده‌ای و ما دیگر نمی‌توانیم این وضعیت را تحمل کنیم.» ➕«می‌خواهی به مربیگری ادامه بد…

Signed Mohamadhasan

15 Nov 2026, 05:16 UTC285 views21 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🗣زیزو: ❓حضور امباپه همه‌چیز را تغییر می‌دهد... ➕«همه‌چیز را عوض می‌کند؛ ترجیح می‌دهیم او را در اختیار داشته باشیم تا اینکه نباشد. هیچ مشکلی وجود ندارد و همراه ما خواهد بود. خودتان خواهید دید که چطور بازی می‌کنیم. این‌ها مسائل فنی و مربوط به کادرفنی است.» ❓شایعات اختلاف و رابطه بد با امباپه؟ ➕«بله انگار این پیامی است که خیلی‌ها می‌خواهند منتقل کنند... نمی‌فهمم، اما موضوع آنچنان مهمی هم نیست. به همین دلیل وارد این …

❤16❤‍🔥4👎1

Signed Mohamadhasan

14 Nov 2026, 21:46 UTC≈1,390 views123 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

پرتغال در اولین بازی بعد از خداحافظی کریستیانو، با نتیجه ۴-۱ در مقابل دانمارک شکست خورد؛ برناردو دقیقه ۷۹ وارد زمین شد و دقیقه ۹۳ تک گل پرتغال را زد. این برای اولین بار از سال ۲۰۱۰ بود که پرتغال در یک بازی خانگی، ۴ گل یا بیشتر دریافت می‌کند. 🏳 @RealMadridPage ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

🔥104👍14❤5

Signed Mohamadhasan

14 Nov 2026, 21:41 UTC≈1,390 views36 reactionsread 15 November 2026

برناردو برای پرتغال گل میزنه

❤31👎5

Signed Mohamadhasan

14 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,810 views41 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🔸و حالا اظهارات پسر نگریرا در برابر قاضی پرونده، حدوداً یکسال پیش[با ترجمه فارسی، حتما ببینید] ➕«با اینکه ۵ درصد از سهام نیلسات دستم بود، اصلاً و ابداً روحم هم خبر نداشت که پدرم از طریق نیلسات، داسنیل یا حتی شرکت سوسرکم بین سال‌های ۲۰۰۳ تا ۲۰۰۵ حتی یک یورو هم برای باشگاه بارسلونا فاکتور صادر کرده باشد. اصلاً چنین چیزی تو کتم نمی‌رفت و غیرممکن بود، چون پدرم به خاطر اصول اخلاقی خودش و چیزی که همیشه به همه و به خودم می…

🤯20🤬11❤5🖕5

Signed Mohamadhasan

14 Nov 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,840 views48 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

درباره نگریرا پرسیده بودید که بعضیا میگن دیگه پرونده تمومه و ... داستان از چه قراره واقعا؟ اونایی که باید شهادت میدادن تو دادگاه تقریبا تموم شده... حکم اصلی هنوز نیومده... اینی که تو عکس می‌بینید یعنی جرارد لوپز در برابر قاضی مدعی شد زمانی که هدایت تیم دوم بارسلونا را بر عهده داشته، از گزارش‌های داوری خاویر انریکز استفاده می‌کرده است. سرمربی سابق بارسا اتلتیک (تیم B)، روز جمعه در چارچوب پرونده نگریرا در دادگاه حاضر…

🖕36🤬10❤2

Signed Mohamadhasan

14 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,870 views58 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

📊وینی به ۱۰۰ گل زده و ۶۴ پاس گل (در ۲۲۲ بازی) زیرنظر آنچلوتی رسید و به پنجمین بازیکنی تبدیل شد که برای کارلتو بیشترین گل را زده(۹۰ گل در رئال مادرید و ۱۰ گل در برزیل): فیلیپو اینزاگی — ۱۶۱ گل کریم بنزما — ۱۲۱ گل کریستیانو رونالدو — ۱۱۲ گل آندری شوچنکو — ۱۰۳ گل وینی — ۱۰۰ گل 🏳 @RealMadridPage ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

🔥42❤11❤‍🔥3👍2

Signed Mohamadhasan

14 Nov 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,880 views65 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

کار جدید حمید سحری 🏳 @RealMadridPage ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

❤65

14 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,070 views44 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔻باخت ۳-۲ تیم آنچلوتی مقابل ژاپن 🔸وینی کامل بازی کرد و دو گل زد --- گل‌ها در کانال ویدیو قرار گرفت. 🔸اندریک ۲۰ دقیقه بازی کرد. 🏳 @RealMadridPage ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

👍30❤8🔥3💔2❤‍🔥1

Signed Milad

14 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC≈2,010 views30 reactionsread 15 November 2026

چه بازی خوبی دارن وینی و اندریک

❤‍🔥24❤3👍3

Signed Milad

14 Nov 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,050 views18 reactionsread 15 November 2026

کانال ویدیو رو دنبال کنید حتماً @MadridistaTV1 @MadridistaTV1

👍13❤5

Signed Milad

14 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC≈2,000 views42 reactionsread 15 November 2026

دو تا سوپرگل زده وینی فعلا به ژاپن

🔥36👍5❤‍🔥1

Signed Milad

Showing the 12 most recent of 738 posts we hold for @RealMadridPage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RealMadridPage edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @RealMadridPage as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
29 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTCAnonymous Poll772 voters

انتخاب شما؟

  1. تیبو6%
  2. فده8%
  3. جود42%
  4. هاوسن3%
  5. دیومانده59%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 19:55 UTCAnonymous Poll783 voters

با توجه به وضعیت ورودی‌ها و خروجی‌های تیم در پنجره نقل‌وانتقالات تابستانی ۲۰۲۶، به عملکرد رئال مادرید در این پنجره از ۱۰ چه نمره‌ای می‌دهید؟

  1. 🔟 ۱۰ — ایده‌آل12%
  2. 9️⃣ ۹ — بسیار عالی12%
  3. 8️⃣ ۸ — عالی18%
  4. 7️⃣ ۷ — خوب31%
  5. 6️⃣ ۶ — متوسط18%
  6. 5️⃣ ۵ — متوسط رو به ضعیف5%
  7. 4️⃣ ۴ — ضعیف2%
  8. بین ۱ تا ۴ — بسیار ضعیف1%
  9. 0️⃣ ۰ — فاجعه1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz947 voters

کوئیز: بهترین گلزن رئال مادرید در فصل ۲۰۰۸/۰۹؟

  1. کریستیانو35%
  2. هیگواین20%
  3. رائول21%
  4. نیستلروی25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 738 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RealMadridCFNews | رئال مادرید سی اف نیوز
@RealMadridCfNews · 30,928
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
Madrid TV Show
@madridtvshow · 85,009
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
1xBet
@ir_1xhelp · 25,324
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Real Madrid | رئال مادرید
@Real_M_Newsir · 210,834
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REAL MADRID PAGE” (@RealMadridPage), 16,718 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealMadridPage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.