Channel
@RealCryptoLogger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,989subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001971790010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RealCryptoLogger |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RealCryptoLogger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 3,989 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 3,993 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 3,994 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
886 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 409 | 46.2% | |
| ❤ | 174 | 19.6% | |
| 👍 | 150 | 16.9% | |
| 😢 | 55 | 6.21% | |
| 👎 | 30 | 3.39% | |
| 😭 | 15 | 1.69% | |
| 🌭 | 14 | 1.58% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 1.13% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 0.677% | |
| 🥱 | 6 | 0.677% | |
| 🤨 | 5 | 0.564% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.564% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 0.451% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.339% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 886reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Может хватит бухтеть и дестабилизировать ситуацию в блокчейне? Есть инфа от знающего человека, что у нас в блокчейне Flow скоро ожидаются реальные изменения. После того как стабилизируют ситуацию со взломом, заблокируют средства хакера. Тогда везде и запустят блокчейн. Все пулы ликвидности, дексы, поднимут и будут держать, хакер ничего не сможет сделать. Сейчас главное не бухтеть. От нас требуется сидеть тихо. По…
😁52🌭14❤5🍓4👍1👎1
Столько хейта. Просто ужас. Я включил бота обратно, кто хочет, может использовать. Просто знайте, что я не сливаю ваши приватки, не дрейню ваши кошельки. Выше всё описано. Честно говоря, все эти боты были в паблике, бесплатно, что бы нагнать аудитории. У меня намечается крупный проект, который я долго готовлю, и планирую монетизировать. 3 раза уже обжёгся на этих паблик тулзах. Это был последний.
❤54😁23👍14😭1
Вижу кучу постов, личных сообщений, по поводу моего бота — @PushoverAlerterBot. Уже шизо-теории строят, что я дрейню кого-то, деньги краду, фотки сливаю, и так далее. Вы — идиоты. Естественно, ничем подобным я не занимаюсь. Просто зайдите в документацию Telegram, и почитайте, как работает приватность ботов в групповых Telegram чатах. Если она включена — бот не может видеть никакие сообщения (текст, голосовые, ка…
👍49😁29❤16😢7🥱5🔥2
А со словами в интернете, надо быть поосторожней! Особенно когда ты особо не скрываешься, и палишь свою личность. Я ведь могу и D trade натравить!
😁32👍14❤1🔥1
Voice message, posted without a caption
😁33❤1
Какой-то попуск вбросил фейковую информацию о Пушовере. Мол, существует какой-то пересыл. Мол из их приватки бот пересылает картинки. Конечно, никакого пересыла нет, так как у бота включена приватность, и бот видит только команды. Это легко можно проверить, создав своего бота с такой же настройкой. Как таких в криптовалюту заносит вообще?
👍10😁1
Кстати, сам я ничего не заработал на MOODENG((
😢27😁24❤7🍌3🥱1
Мне придётся отключить этого бота... Очень много людей набежало. Но вы можете подписаться на мой основной канал — https://t.me/RealCryptoLogger. Думаю, с публичными ботами покончено, но в планах запустить другие интересные сервисы, так что подпишитесь, что бы не пропустить. Кто не знает — я разработчик, в основном зарабатываю со своих торговых/арбитражных ботов, автоматизации стратегий, и всего в таком роде. Не Ин…
😁34👎18❤9😢9👍6
Как зарегестрироваться на Coinbase? После ввода номера телефона, при попытке отправить проверочное смс — получаю вот такую ошибку, хотя спама нет. Ни разу не удалось отправить код. Кто сталкивался? Как решить проблему? Поддержка не помогает. Сил уже нет.
😁8👎7👍4❤1
Написал простенького бота для детекта расспреда между справедливой ценой и ценой в стакане на фьючерсах Mexc. Закреп с актуальными спредами обновляется каждые X секунд, а алерты приходит на спреды >= 10%. Использовать не рекомендую, потеряете деньги. Фильтров нет. https://t.me/FairPriceSpreads
👍14❤9😁1
1. AIA 14.72% 2. XNAP 1.60% 3. BLUE 1.31% 4. CULT 1.18% 5. AVGOSTOCK 1.17% 6. INTCSTOCK 1.12% 2025-11-06 17:12:33 UTC
👍10😁2
Ребят, я не мусорный инфл, как все вышеперечисленные. Я запостил только потому что никто из тех на кого я подписан не запостил... В этом канале только качественный контент. Можете отписываться.
❤57👍25😁13🔥4👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RealCryptoLogger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 559,920 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Logger” (@RealCryptoLogger), 3,989 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealCryptoLogger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.