He is still in custody, he said please pray for him. And that he loves all of you.
π111β€23β‘7β€βπ₯4π3π’1

Channel
@RealCombatLVL
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
6,327subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001708275513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RealCombatLVL |
| Created | 4 November 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RealCombatLVL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 6,327 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 6,333 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 6,342 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 6,343 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 6,343 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 September 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
768 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 379 | 49.3% | |
| β€ | 89 | 11.6% | |
| π― | 67 | 8.72% | |
| π€¬ | 50 | 6.51% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 44 | 5.73% | |
| π | 31 | 4.04% | |
| π’ | 29 | 3.78% | |
| β‘ | 27 | 3.52% | |
| π | 16 | 2.08% | |
| π | 14 | 1.82% | |
| π | 14 | 1.82% | |
| π₯ | 6 | 0.781% | |
| π | 2 | 0.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 768reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
He is still in custody, he said please pray for him. And that he loves all of you.
π111β€23β‘7β€βπ₯4π3π’1
I'm being locked up. I love you guys please pray for me.
π174π€¬16β€4π3π2
πΊπΈπ©π€βπΊπΈπΊπΈ β During the Biden administration, a patriot, Kai Liam Nix, infiltrated Antifa cell discord servers and discovered vital and sometimes even compromising information. β‘οΈ Nix managed to shut down many of these servers and doxx many high-ranking individuals associated with these poisonous anti-American organizations. β‘οΈ Nix founded the 'Appalachian Archives', later, 'American Archives', to document his findiβ¦
π14β€6π₯6
Nothing new under the sun... We become what we hate only if we allow it. The spiritual war is intensifying by the day. Seek Christ in all your ways my friends. Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Isaiah 5:19 @Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes
π―20π11β€3
Photo, posted without a caption
β€βπ₯18π―14β€8
Thank you to all who have given so far. The situation is urgent. Please share if you can. https://t.me/RealCombatLVL/25223
β€βπ₯9π1
βπ¬πͺπππ±π©π³π©β’ pinned Β«This is what I was able to create for now. Thank you all for your love and support. https://www.givesendgo.com/CombatLVLMedicalNeeds Cashapp- https://cash.app/$combatlvl Venmo- https://account.venmo.com/u/combatlvlΒ»
Doctor just came in, and said my insurance basically ran out, I can barely sit up or walk and they are going to discharge me. Un fucking believable.
π€¬32π3π2π2
Photo, posted without a caption
π―31π€¬1
So when a crow recognizes patterns, it's "intelligent" and "really cool" but when I do it I'm delusional and, at odds with what is considered standard methodology in mainstream historical linguistics. It be like that sometimes. Nevertheless, all the glory goes to God; always.
β‘20π4π―2
In a lot of pain this evening, please keep praying for me. Having a hard time even figuring out what to post about. I'm still a bit in shock at how quick my life has been flipped upside down. But, wheelchair or not, my hands can still aim and fight. Love you guys. β€οΈππ»
β€40π10π3π1
Are we on the verge of civil war?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RealCombatLVL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Are we on the verge of civil war?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 3 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 268,917 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββπ¬πͺπππ±π©π³π©β’β (@RealCombatLVL), 6,327 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealCombatLVL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.