The commits were all adjusted or rewritten for ReVanced's purpose by hand and are not even copies. - Osumatrix said Incidentally, this is how Osum defines code rewritten for Revanced's purposes π€‘ Check commit ad3605e
π25π14β€4π³2π€―1

Channel
@ReXgroups
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
3,113subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001842355062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ReXgroups |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ReXgroups |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 3,113 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 3,116 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 3,118 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 3,124 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 3,123 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 April 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,851 reactions across 20 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 355 | 19.2% | |
| π | 319 | 17.2% | |
| π | 212 | 11.5% | |
| π | 138 | 7.46% | |
| π | 113 | 6.10% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 87 | 4.70% | |
| π₯ | 72 | 3.89% | |
| πΎ | 70 | 3.78% | |
| π | 58 | 3.13% | |
| π’ | 58 | 3.13% | |
| π₯΄ | 44 | 2.38% | |
| β‘ | 40 | 2.16% | |
| π«‘ | 40 | 2.16% | |
| π€ | 32 | 1.73% | |
| π€― | 32 | 1.73% | |
| π | 26 | 1.40% | |
| π | 21 | 1.13% | |
| π | 21 | 1.13% | |
| β | 15 | 0.81% | |
| β | 14 | 0.756% | |
| 18 further kinds | 84 | 4.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,851reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2024 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The commits were all adjusted or rewritten for ReVanced's purpose by hand and are not even copies. - Osumatrix said Incidentally, this is how Osum defines code rewritten for Revanced's purposes π€‘ Check commit ad3605e
π25π14β€4π³2π€―1
Wow, look how ReVanced are violating the GPLv3 terms guys. To be specific, theyβve been stripping out copyright headers across all files and commits (U can check out #6740 and #6751). Their excuse? They claim that since Morphe forked ReVanced (which is GPLv3), the files remain under GPLv3, making Morphe's headers invalid. ReVanced is GPLv3 licensed, the headers were added to files forked from ReVanced, the files reβ¦
π€―28π’21π₯΄8π5π4β€2π±1
Let's say hello to Morphe - next generation patching tool
β€72π₯26π9π4β€βπ₯3π2π€©2π2
Happy new year π₯³
β€38π7π6π4β3πΎ1π₯1
https://github.com/inotia00/revanced-patches/pull/174 The journey is nearing its end
π64π’12β€7π«‘6π€3π1π1
Bruh, time to root your phone
π45β‘7π4β€3β1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯΄18β€6π6π4
Hi, does anyone know where inotia00 is π
π97π’9π7π±4π2π€2β€1π1
Happy new year guys πππ
π89β€11β€βπ₯7π6πΎ4π2π₯2β1
If any of u need an YouTube API key for Return YouTube Comment Username feature on RVX, check out here π€―
π35β6π3β2β€1π₯΄1
RVX Discord channel is available right now π€―π€―π€― https://discord.gg/yMnc3EywRZ
β‘29π’16π6π€6π5π₯΄4π4β€3
RVX Discord channel, should or shouldn't ? π
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
π18π³4π3π2π2β‘1π₯΄1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ReXgroups. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
RVX Discord channel, should or shouldn't ? π
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2024 to 12 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 403,557 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βReπβ (@ReXgroups), 3,113 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReXgroups.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.