2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 02:16
13
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:08
13
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
34
Videos
10
Links
32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
14
38.9%
👌
5
13.9%
🔥
5
13.9%
😁
4
11.1%
🥰
3
8.33%
❤
2
5.56%
🤯
2
5.56%
🤔
1
2.78%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2023 to 6 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این نقاشی، مراسم اعدام *آنتوان لاووازیه*(کاشف اکسیژن)، شیمیدان و دانشمند فرانسوی را با گیوتین را نشان میدهد. بعد از پیروزی انقلاب فرانسه، *لاووازیه* به جرم خیانت به ملت، به مرگ محکوم شد. قاضی دادگاهی که حکم لاووازیه را صادر کرد، گفته بود: جمهوری نه دانشمند میخواهد نه شیمیدان! اما ماجرای مرگ لاووازیه هم جالب است. وقتی حکمِ اعدام برايش صادر شد، شاگردهايش را جمع کرد و به آنها گفت:" احتمالا جایگاه حواس و شعور انسان…
این بزرگوار هستند:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xFmQpf4AAAAJ&hl=en
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._D._C._Willard
اچ اندیکسش هم بالاست 😂😂 کلی سایتیشن هم خورده 😂😂😂
همین امسال یه رفرنس هم داشته 😂😂😂
سال ۱۹۷۵ نویسنده اول این مقاله رو نوشته و فرستاده، ژورنال گفته حتما باید بگی I و نگی We برای اینکه یک نفر خودت نویسنده مقاله هستی.
اونم برداشته اسم گربه اش رو به عنوان نویسنده دوم زده و چاپ کرده چون مخالف با نظرشون بوده.
نویسنده دوم، اسم گربه اش هست. اینم عکس گربه اش هست.
پیشرفت بس است، متوقفش کنید!
خبر جدید این که جمعی از دانشمندان، صاحبان فناوری و علاقهمندان به هوش مصنوعی (از بنجیو گرفته تا ایلان ماسک و گری مارکوس و حتی بنیانگذار stable-diffusion) با انتشار نامهای سرگشاده با ابراز نگرانی از بابت پیشرفت سریع هوش مصنوعی، از آزمایشگاههای هوش مصنوعی دنیا خواستهاند که آموزش دادن مدلهای هوش مصنوعی قویتر از GPT-4 را به مدت حداقل ۶ ماه متوقف کنند. این دوستان در این نامه گفتهاند که ب…
Have you heard about RePost.Me telegram Channel ?
اگه توام می خوای از این ویدئو ها بسازی این پست رو به سه نفر بفرست. 🤪🤯😂
این ویدئو توسط نسخه بتا، moviebot.io ساخته شده.
یه سناریو 80 کلمه ای می تونید بگید و با شخصیت های کارتونی یه ویدئو چند ثانیه ای از مکلامشون رو براتون generate میکنه.
یادتون نره share کنین🙈.
@RePost_Me
خب امروز دسترسی به Bard گوگل به منم رسید.
اینو فهمیدم که برخلاف chatGPT کد generate نمیکنه.
اینجام داشتم می پرسیدم که ینی chatGPT بهتر از توئه؟ که بزرگوار قبول نداشت این مورد رو.
بهش گفتم یه جدول بکشه که خودش و chatGPT رو مقایسه کنه که خب خودش رو برتر میدونه.
ولی من همچنان chatGPT رو هم به bard و هم به bingAI ترجیح میدم.
هر چند سرعت bard فعلا که انتشار عمومی هم نداشته بهتر به نظر میرسه.
عکس آخرم دیس ترک من هست😁.
…
⌨ گوگل دسترسی به Bard ( مدل زبانی هوش مصنوعی) رو معرفی کرد!
برای استفاده باید برید تو wait list و صبر کنین تا براتون فعال شه.
Bard.google.com
{ یا vpn روشن کنین یا dns رو عوض کنین }
📱📷 یکی از مواردی که سامسونگ روی دوربین سری جدید s23 ultra مانوور تبلیغاتی میداد زوم روی ماه و گرفتن تصاویر کاملا با کیفیت هست.
حالا یه یوزر Reddit اومده یه عکس خیلی کم کیفیت رو گذاشته روی یک گراند و با گوشی از اون عکس گرفته. به طرز عجیبی عکس جدید با کیفیت شده😂🤯 ( عکس سمت راست ).
این ینی سامسونگ خیلی تو خود دوربین تغییری ایجاد نکرده و دوربین تا حد زیادی مشابه سری های قبلی هست ( این قابیلت زوم 100× از سری s20 ultra و…
👌3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RePost_Me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@RePost_Me named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nlpstuff named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RePost.Me” (@RePost_Me), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RePost_Me.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
