Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SUREBET FREE🇧🇷

Channel

SUREBET FREE🇧🇷

@RdkingSurebet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,246subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001287514024
TypeChannel
Username@RdkingSurebet
DescriptionO fim do RED!❌ 🔥Como funciona? A estratégia se chama Surebet! E você lucra independente do resultado final! Tenha acesso ao Software👇 https://software.rdkingbr.com.br/step/store-checkout-01-2-2/ Teste o Software👇 https://software.rdkingbr.com.br/free-
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RdkingSurebet

Growth

14,22814,27214,2507 August 2026 — 14,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,239 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,228 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,233 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,245 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,240 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,248 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,249 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,251 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,250 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,260 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,272 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,268 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,256 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,252 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,266 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,272 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,266 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,260 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,256 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,246 subscribers14,2467 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,221–14,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 02:2914,246-10
28 Aug 2026, 01:4414,256-4
27 Aug 2026, 03:3214,260-6
26 Aug 2026, 05:3714,266-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:4514,272+6
23 Aug 2026, 21:1614,266+14
22 Aug 2026, 02:0714,252-4
20 Aug 2026, 18:3914,256-12
19 Aug 2026, 16:5314,268-4
18 Aug 2026, 15:3414,272+12
17 Aug 2026, 16:3614,260+10
16 Aug 2026, 08:3414,250-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:2514,251+2
13 Aug 2026, 14:0714,249+1
12 Aug 2026, 13:4514,248+8
11 Aug 2026, 10:1414,240-5
10 Aug 2026, 09:4214,245+12
9 Aug 2026, 09:5114,233+5
8 Aug 2026, 09:1614,228-11
7 Aug 2026, 07:5314,239first reading

Engagement

740 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.553%
avg views ÷ 14,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.7
740 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.672%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
740
of 740 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 740 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held740 (6 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total58,266
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24,400
Videos
49
Links
20,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 740 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 740 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC34 viewsread 29 August 2026

Quer operar no nosso software de maneira 100% Gratuita?🤖 Teste o nosso software com operações de até 1%🚀 Tem dúvidas? Chame ➡️@rdkingconsultor

29 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC35 viewsread 29 August 2026

👆Nessa operação Lucramos Independente do Resultado! Obs: Gostaria de lembrar a todos sobre a dinâmica das odds. Normalmente, as odds duram entre 2 a 10 minutos. Se por acaso uma odd durar menos de 2 minutos, nossa equipe de trade desconsidera essa oportunidade e será enviada outra entrada para compensar. Caso a odd tenha sido alterada coloque na calculadora, se houver lucro pode seguir com a operação✅ Está com difi

29 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC34 viewsread 29 August 2026

✅Se cadastre nas casas e pegue essa oportunidade de Surebet👇

29 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC34 viewsread 29 August 2026

⚠️Oportunidade de Surebet Detectada⚠️ ✅Lucro: 6,57% 🏟Evento: Sebastian Gorzny – Raphael Collignon 🗓Data: Domingo, 30 de agosto de 2026 16:00 🏠 Betano Odd: 2.35 / Stake: R$453.00 🏠 SuperBet Odd: 1.95 / Stake: R$547.00 💸Ganhos: R$64 🔞 Aposte com Responsabilidade

29 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Obs: Depósito mínimo recomendado R$90 reais Segue o link para cadastro das casas: BetNacional: CLIQUE AQUI E SE CADASTRE Betsson: CLIQUE AQUI E SE CADASTRE Betfair: CLIQUE AQUI E SE CADASTRE Betano: CLIQUE AQUI E SE CADASTRE Superbet: CLIQUE AQUI E SE CADASTRE Quer ganhar mais de R$5.000?💰 Veja o passo a passo para alavancar com os bônus de boas vindas das casas!👇 CLIQUE AQUI PARA ASSISTIR

1

29 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC68 viewsread 29 August 2026

🕵️‍♂️Nosso time já está de olho em possíveis entradas novamente.✅ Vamos soltar entre 1 a 3 entradas nessa noite, fiquem ligados.🔥 🏠Possíveis entradas nas seguintes casas👇

Showing the 12 most recent of 740 posts we hold for @RdkingSurebet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,258,256 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SUREBET FREE🇧🇷” (@RdkingSurebet), 14,246 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RdkingSurebet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.