Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rawen Signals

Channel

Rawen Signals

@RawenSignals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,902subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541519039
TypeChannel
Username@RawenSignals
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RawenSignals

Growth

2,9022,9192,910.57 August 2026 — 2,919 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,919 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,917 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,911 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,902 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,899–2,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:172,902-9
11 Aug 2026, 00:532,911-6
8 Aug 2026, 09:362,917-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:022,919no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:592,919first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4157.7%
👏2129.6%
👍34.23%
🐳22.82%
😱22.82%
🥰22.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,230 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Mükemmel bir haber bu tarz haberleri takip etmek lazım çok yakında aktifliğe geri döneceğim, şu haber işleri üzerinde odaklanmıştım

4👏1

9 Jun 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,030 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RawenewsPhoto

Cüzdandan $h satışı 0x9e995952ef7665b243eeef0693acd7fed7150504 Cüzdanda 16 milyon dolar değerinde token var. Pro EN: $h sale from wallet 0x9e995952ef7665b243eeef0693acd7fed7150504 The wallet contains tokens worth $16 million. Pro Rawenews | Join Pro

4👍3👏2

3 Jun 2026, 20:52 UTC≈2,010 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

sanırım MM coinleri ayrışsın diye bu şekilde yapmış otomatik I think they did this automatically so that MM coins would diverge.

4👏2

3 Jun 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,780 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

LAB ile SOL gibi coinlerin arasında ters korelasyon var There is an inverse correlation between coins like LAB and SOL.

👏51

1 Jun 2026, 22:47 UTC≈1,750 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Acil bir açıklama gelmezse bu coin magmaya kadar iner 2 buy back haberi çıkartıp pumplatırlar, sonra yine düşer Unless an urgent announcement is made, this coin will sink to the magma level. They'll release two buy-back announcements to pump it up, and then it will fall again.

3

1 Jun 2026, 22:45 UTC≈1,540 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$EDGE o kadar fena çakıldıki takım bile sebebini bilmiyor çöp coin $EDGE crashed so badly even the team doesn't know why; it's a garbage coin.

1😱1

1 Jun 2026, 22:44 UTC≈1,200 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rawenews

#edge Sevgili EdgeX topluluğu, Sizinle şeffaf olmak istiyoruz: Edge tokeninde ani ve olağandışı bir fiyat hareketi gözlemledik ve bunun nedenini aktif olarak araştırıyoruz. Ekibimiz neler olduğunu anlamak için acilen çalışıyor. Raporlayacak bilgileri doğruladığımız anda güncellemeleri paylaşacağız. Bu arada, lütfen güncellemeler için yalnızca resmi EdgeX kanallarına güvenin ve doğrulanmamış spekülasyonlara karşı d

🐳21👏1

1 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC918 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

%6 düşmüş, değerlendirenler vardır umarım It dropped by %6 I miss the trade but hope it made you some money

👏21

31 May 2026, 20:57 UTC972 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Normalde, $STG ve $ZRO aynı şey değil miydi? Neden STG yükselirken ZRO yükselmiyor. Belki yükseliş başlar $ZRO için eğer arkasında bir olay yoksa stg nin Normally, weren't $STG and $ZRO the same thing? Why isn't ZRO rising while STG is? Maybe a rise will start for $ZRO if there's no underlying event behind it for STG.

2👏2

31 May 2026, 00:12 UTC979 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BNB nin yükselmesi ile birlikte cake de yükselmiş, lista, twt ve xvs sıradaki coinler olabilir, ancak bnb duyurudan sonra kötü bir haber duyurup sell the news olursa işler kötü With BNB's rise, the cake has also risen; Lista, TWT, and XVS could be the next coins, but things will go bad if BNB announces bad news and people sell the news.

2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RawenSignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rawen Signals” (@RawenSignals), 2,902 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RawenSignals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.