Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 201.6%
- avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 64.5
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 20
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
133 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
18 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC38 views12 reactionsread 22 October 2026 خوشآمد میگم به عزیزانی که تازه به ما اضافه شدند.
در روآندار من دارنده اطلاعاتی از روانشناسیم و مشتاقانه اونها رو به اشتراک میذارم. بهمانند جنگلبانی که خودش رو مامور به حفظ، سلامت، شادابی، رونق و ازدیاد درختان جنگل میدونه.
برای من همراهی شما بینهایت و بینهایت ارزشمنده و امیدوارم کنار هم یاد بگیریم که یاد بگیریم❤.
❤12
18 Oct 2026, 15:04 UTC38 views7 reactionsread 22 October 2026 برای بزرگ بودن، خدمت کنید.
_بهبه
📚برد از رختکن شروع میشود
@Ravandaar
❤7
16 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC46 views6 reactionsread 22 October 2026 مقالاتی درباره علل روانکاوانه علاقه مردان به فوتبال خوندم که بیا راجعبهشون حرف نزنیم😶.
🤔4❤2
15 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC71 views9 reactionsread 22 October 2026 مشخصه یک مرد نابالغ این است که میل دارد به دلیلی، با شرافت بمیرد، و مشخصهی یک مرد بالغ این است که میل دارد به دلیلی، با تواضع زندگی کند.
📚ناتوردشت
@Ravandaar
❤9
12 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC66 views8 reactionsread 22 October 2026 بر همگان پوشیده نیست که من مشتاق و مدیون ادبیاتم و حافظ جز سه شاعریه که آموزنده و عاشق نگاه اونها به زندگی هستم.
این تک بیتی رو اخیرا زیاد زمزمه میکنم. بیتی که انگار طبیبگونه مرهم میذاره بر زخمهای بیرحمانه و ناعادلانه این روزها...
به مناسبت ۲۰ مهر، روز بزرگداشت حافظِ عزیز:
چشم آسایش که دارد از سپهر تیزرو؟
ساقیا جامی به من ده تا بیاسایم دمی
@Ravandaar
❤8
7 Oct 2026, 06:04 UTC77 views5 reactionsread 22 October 2026 شاید علائم، پیامآوران معنیاند و تنها زمانی ناپدید میشوند که پیامشان دریافت شده است.
📚وقتی نیچه گریست
@Ravandaar
❤5
26 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 22 October 2026 Photo
از جامجهانی تا نازی
فروید در مقاله "روانشناسی گروه و تحلیل خود"ش اظهار میکنه که ما انسانها زمانی گروه تشکیل میدیم که قابلیت تنظیم رفتارهامون رو (یا کارکردهای فراخود که شما بخون وجدان و اخلاقیات) به یک رهبر واگذار میکنیم.
حالا چرا این کارو میکنیم؟ چون تحمل تعارض درونیِ ناشی از امیال ضداجتماعیمون در برابر نیازمون به روابط اجتماعی خیلی سخته!
اونقدر سخت که حاضریم رهبر گروه رو (که میتونه فرد، ایده و هرچیزی باشه) ا…
❤5🔥1
23 Sept 2026, 05:50 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 22 October 2026 رنج، بهای بصیرت است.
📚وقتی نیچه گریست
@Ravandaar
❤4
20 Sept 2026, 03:44 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 22 October 2026 بچهها :)))) اینو من تو اسکجوال مسیج گذاشته بودم که بعدا طولانیتر راجع بهش بنویسم :)))).
یادم رفته بود که نوشتمش تا خودش سر تاریخش ارسال شد:)))))).
سطح تولیدمحتوا رو دارم جابجا میکنم:))))).
😁6
19 Sept 2026, 17:52 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 22 October 2026 فروید رویا رو شاهراهی عنوان میکنه که مقصدش ضمیر ناخوداگاه ماست.
❤5👍2
18 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 22 October 2026 به باور من، دونمایهترین نوع روانشناس افرادی هستند که با تکیه بر دانش خودشون، اطرافیانشون رو دستکاری روانی میکنند.
@Ravandaar
❤6
16 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC98 views6 reactionsread 22 October 2026 _تقدیم به جانهای خسته....
تا حالا شده چند روز قبل از یک تاریخ خاص، ناگهان حالت عوض بشه… بدون اینکه اولش بدونی چرا؟
بیقرار بشی، اضطراب بگیری، خاطراتی که فکر میکردی تموم شدن دوباره برگردن، یا حتی احساس کنی چیزی درونت دوباره به همان روزهای گذشته برگشته؟
شاید دلیلش فقط «حال بد» نباشه.
ممکنه به چیزی مربوط باشه که در روانشناسی بهش میگن «واکنش سالگرد تروما» (Trauma Anniversary Reaction).
جالب اینجاست که واکنش معمو…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RavanDaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روآندار” (@RavanDaar), 32 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavanDaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.