https://youtu.be/GUXUMbO0nGc?si=AUFDUOwqZgktyIWe
❤1

Channel
@RareEarthInvest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
607subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001637753062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RareEarthInvest |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RareEarthInvest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 607 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 595 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 588 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 588 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (9 December 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 935 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
118 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 36.4% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 22.0% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 19.5% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 12.7% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RareEarthInvest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 December 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://youtu.be/GUXUMbO0nGc?si=AUFDUOwqZgktyIWe
❤1
Давненько не общались с Сержем за рынок редкоземов и не обсуждали новости. Исправляемся) Приятного просмотра.
🎉1👍1
Meteoric Resources (ASX:MEI) опубликовали DFS Кратко о производстве 🔻 Среднегодовое производство NdPr = 3 862 тонны (в PFS было 4 228), всех РЗЭ суммарно 12,5 тыс тонн. 🔻 Среднегодовое производство DyTb = 127 тонн (в PFS было 130) 🔻Всего за всё время жизни месторождения производство 88 829т и 2 926т NdPr иDyTb соответственно (в PFS было 84 572т и 2 600т) 🔻Извлечение магнитных редкоземов 71% (в PFS также) 🔻Запасы 15…
🔥8❤2⚡1
Viridis обогнала по капитализации Meteoric. VMM= 516 млнА$ MEI= 450 млнА$ Ваши мысли? Что дальше?
❤2
Цены на редкоземельные элементы С начала года на самые "ходовые" магнитные редкоземы (неодим, празеодим, диспрозий, тербий) цены выросли на 5-30% #Цены #ЦеныНаРедкоземы
👍2
🖐Привет! Если тут ещё остались те самые опытные частные инвесторы, кто до сих пор имеет доступ к бирже ASX и инвестирует в блудняк в погоне за иксами, несу вам идею на изучение (не рекомендация) в секторе РЗЭ. Power Minerals Limited (ASX: PNN). У ребят капа на момент написания этого поста 44 млн австралийских. Компания в апреле этого года купила малоизученный РЗЭ проект, аккуратно рядом с ребятами VMM и MEI В подр…
❤15🔥9👍2🆒1
Всем привет! Давненько не выходил на связь — исправляюсь. Прочёл новость в канале у Сержа, о том что американская компания USA Rare Earth приобрела бразильскую Serra Verde за 2,8 млрд. Давайте разберёмся, что за актив был куплен за 2,8 ярда. Много это или мало, и что это значит для рынка, других компаний, и инвесторов? Serra Verde — не публичная бразильская компания с месторождением ионной глины в Бразилии, в штате…
👍12❤4🔥2
Viridis Mining and Minerals (ASX:VMM) Обновление презентации. Что ждать дальше? Компания обновила корпоративную презентацию для отраслевой онлайн конференции «Неизведанные природные ресурсы». Если всё получится, то от первых скважин после приобретения редкоземельного проекта в Бразилии до старта добычи пройдет всего 5 лет. Небывалая скорость. Запуск производства планируется во втором квартале 2028 года. Полное фина…
👍6🔥3
West Cobar Metals (ASX:WC1) — галлий, редкоземы, диверсификация. WC1 — одна из первых нано-кап компаний, на которую обращал внимание, когда начинал изучать редкоземельный рынок в 2022 году. На канале уже писал о компании тут. За эти несколько лет компания продвигала и разведывала свой редкоземельный проект в Австралии Salazar (недалеко от OD6), покупала литиевый проект в Неваде, покупала и бурила медный проект, зол…
🔥8⚡4😁2❤1🤨1
Цены на редкоземельные элементы снова пошли вверх Текущая цена 87$ за кг оксида неодима-празеодима всё ещё сильно ниже долгосрочного прогноза агентства Adamas Intelligence в 100-130$ #Цены #ЦеныНаРедкоземы
🔥6❤1
Строительство главного рудника компании Pensana идет полным ходом. Компания Pensana, по которой 3 года назад с Сержем и коллегами проводили инвесткомитет, говорит, что все подготовительные работы завершены, и строительство идет полным ходом. Ввод в эксплуатацию запланирован на 2027 год, с целевым объемом производства 20 000 тонн MREC в год. Все подробности в этой публикации компании. Долгие 3 года, когда цена на Р…
⚡4
🇯🇵Япония начала первое в мире испытание по глубоководной добыче редкоземельных элементов. В понедельник японское горнодобывающее судно «Чикю», финансируемое правительством Японии, отправилось в воды вблизи острова Минамитори, чтобы изучить ил морского дна, богатый редкоземельными элементами, на глубине около 6 километров. В случае успеха этот проект станет первой в мире долгосрочной попыткой поднять содержащий редк…
👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @RareEarthInvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 82,488 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rare Earths Invest” (@RareEarthInvest), 607 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RareEarthInvest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.