Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Rapfarsi 🎧

@Rapfarsi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

68,896subscribers

-123 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003119869
TypeChannel
Username@Rapfarsi
Created28 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rapfarsi

Growth

68,89669,01968,957.55 August 2026 — 69,019 subscribers6 August 2026 — 68,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 68,985 subscribers8 August 2026 — 68,967 subscribers9 August 2026 — 68,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68,938 subscribers11 August 2026 — 68,938 subscribers11 August 2026 — 68,915 subscribers12 August 2026 — 68,896 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68,878–69,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:1868,896-19
11 Aug 2026, 18:2768,915-23
11 Aug 2026, 15:3968,938no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:2568,938-13
9 Aug 2026, 13:2168,951-16
8 Aug 2026, 10:1168,967-18
7 Aug 2026, 12:4568,985-13
6 Aug 2026, 16:0068,998-21
5 Aug 2026, 19:3369,019first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 11 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,841 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rapfarsi 🎧” (@Rapfarsi), 68,896 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rapfarsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.