Crazy that people actually followed what was told and it worked Also its very good to know that things done 2 years ago are still helping people :)
❤25🔥6
Channel
@Random_postinng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
835subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001905717068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Random_postinng |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Random_postinng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 835 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 838 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:23 | 839 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
924 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 298 | 32.3% | |
| 💯 | 273 | 29.5% | |
| 🔥 | 250 | 27.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 4.98% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 1.41% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 1.08% | |
| 🥱 | 8 | 0.866% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.649% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.325% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 0.325% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.325% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.216% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.216% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.108% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.108% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.108% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.108% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.108% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.108% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.108% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 924 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Crazy that people actually followed what was told and it worked Also its very good to know that things done 2 years ago are still helping people :)
❤25🔥6
...
🔥25🥱7💯4🥰1
Interesting point but a fact Quality of your Thoughts dictate the Quality of your Reality Now read that again
💯30💔1🥱1😱1
Mains 1 marks aayenge jaldd hi Many people/relatives/friends will comment on things that they shouldnt But dont take them to your heart... 🫵🏻 very well know how capable you are so trust yourself and keep working hard TRUST Me... It will PAY OFF and be worth
💯50❤9
WHY? Cuz you owe it to yourself to see how good it can be ✨ Now read it again
❤48🔥5👍1👎1
The sad/happy part about life is majority of it goes in Binary. Simple shabdo mei either haa ya na mei chalti hai majority cheeze. you did your work : yes/no you woke up on time : yes/no you got where you wanted too : yes/no again it is similar to the example of river that i give..... you either cross the river or just drown in it.... theres is nothing like i crossed 80% or crossed half. Coming onto the conclusion…
❤51👍2👌1💯1🥰1
You struggle to believe in yourself because the brain tracks action, not intention. If your actions contradict your goals, the brain stops trusting you. Self-belief is earned, not imagined.
🔥47💯9❤5
And reason of sending this? its all about manifesting, keeping your word and proving yourself out there :)
❤26🌚3💯2😈2❤🔥1
When Virat Kohli was just 26 years old he said it in an interview "Mai ek ordinary career nahi chahta, mai ye nahi chata ki log kal ko bole ki theek hai yarr ek VIRAT naam ka player khela tha ek time pe" 10 years down the line, he proved it what he said 🥹🤌. Just have a look what he has achieved till date. Bro is literally in the heart of every indian and we all have been at a place where we have turned off our TV ju…
❤36💯4🔥2😈1
Doom scrolling is making you dumber. Think about the last time out of 50,000 posts you actually read something you used in your actual life. Maybe 4 times. The rest of the content just overwhelms your mind into inaction. Scroll less . Be more productive.
❤36💯9❤🔥5🙏1
I just read the most goated line ever "People are more afraid of missing a text message than missing their life purpose"
💯50❤7🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥34💯9❤4💅3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Random_postinng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Random posts” (@Random_postinng), 835 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Random_postinng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.