Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VIP

Channel

VIP

@RajaScalperAlang77

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

7subscribers

-5,035 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002373729179
TypeChannel
Username@RajaScalperAlang77
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RajaScalperAlang77

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

75,0422,524.57 August 2026 — 5,042 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,042 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5,035. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:367-5,035
7 Aug 2026, 08:155,042no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:085,042first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.7%
avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
Avg views / post
3.1
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total52
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC3 viewsread 9 August 2026

DAILY PERFORMANCE FRIDAY 07/08/2026 Gold Buy➡️ 850 Pips Vip|Public Gold Buy➡️ 300 Pips Vip|Public Gold Buy➡️ 178 Pips Vip Gold Sell➡️ 115 Pips Vip Gold Sell➡️ 200 Pips Vip|Public Gold Sell➡️ 250 Pips Vip|Public Gold Sell➡️ Hit Risk Vip Gold Buy➡️ 100 Pips Vip TOTAL WINNING : 1993 PIPS ✅ TOTAL LOSS : 30 PIPS ❌ TOTAL SETUP : 7/8

7 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC3 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

I want to testify to my winnings this morning. Thank you

7 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC3 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

BOOM BOOM, More Profits Secured! GOLD RUNNING 130+ PIPS Let's collect partial PROFITS and set the rest at BREAKEVEN for a zero-risk trade

7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC3 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Round 2, Another Strong Buy Setup! GOLD RUNNING 80+ PIPS Let's collect partial PROFITS and set the rest at BREAKEVEN for a zero-risk trade

7 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC4 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Thank God it's Friday! GOLD RUNNING 30+ PIPS✅ Let's collect partial PROFITS and set the rest at BREAKEVEN for a zero-risk trade‼️

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RajaScalperAlang77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIP” (@RajaScalperAlang77), 7 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RajaScalperAlang77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.