Channel
@Railway_SSC_Maths_Reasoning_Quiz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
225,543subscribers
-459 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001277308994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Railway_SSC_Maths_Reasoning_Quiz |
| Description | ® 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 ᴍᴀᴛʜs & ʀᴇᴀsᴏɴɪɴɢ ssᴄ, ʀᴀɪʟᴡᴀʏ, ᴜᴘsᴄ, ʙᴀɴᴋɪɴɢ, ᴘᴀᴛᴡᴀʀ, ᴘᴏʟɪᴄᴇ, ᴛᴇᴛ & ᴀʟʟ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴇxᴀᴍs ✆ ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ & ᴘʀᴏᴍᴏ. ➛ @Pratap_Chouhan 🙏 𝐏𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐞 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Railway_SSC_Maths_Reasoning_Quiz |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 225,543 | -208 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 225,751 | -182 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 225,933 | -69 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 226,002 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 46,520 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
151 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 118 | 78.1% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 7.28% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.64% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
विलुप्त संख्या ज्ञात कीजिए। 64:512:144: [Revenue Inspector 2014]
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7👌1👍1
नीचे दिए गए चार समूहों में उस समूह को ज्ञात कीजिए जो दिए गए समूह के समान है। (13:20:27) [SSC (10+2) 2013]
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2👌1🙏1
नीचे दी गयी श्रेणी में लुप्त पद ज्ञात करो। BZA, DYC, FXE, ?, JVI
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5👌1
नीचे दी गयी श्रेणी में लुप्त पद ज्ञात कीजिये BZA, DYC, FXE, ?, JVI
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4👌1
एक कूट भाषा में 'KAVERI' को 'VAKIRE' लिखा जाता है। उसी कूट भाषा में 'MYSORE' को क्या लिखा जायेगा?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤10
यदि GOLD को IQNF लिखा जाता है तो WIND को क्या लिखा जायेगा?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
यदि A = 1, PAT = 37, तो TAP = ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6🔥1
एक महिला की ओर संकेत करते हुए साइमन ने कहा, वह मेरे पिता की एकमात्र बहन की पुत्री है। वह महिला साइमन से किस प्रकार संबंधित है?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
C माता है A और B की, यदि D पति है B का, तो C कौन है D की?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4😍1
A की माँ B की बहन है और C की बेटी है, D बेटी है B की और बहन है E की, तो C का E से क्या सम्बन्ध है?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5👌2
रमेश और सुरेश भाई-भाई हैं, राखी और गीता आपस में बहनें हैं, रमेश का लड़का गीता का भाई है, बताइए सुरेश और राखी का आपस में क्या संबंध हुआ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7👌4
K, B से ज्यादा सुंदर है, B, Y के समान सुंदर नहीं है, J, B या Y के समान सुंदर नहीं है तदनुसार, सुंदरता कि कोटि में सबसे निचले स्तर पर कौन है?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Railway_SSC_Maths_Reasoning_Quiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
विलुप्त संख्या ज्ञात कीजिए। 64:512:144: [Revenue Inspector 2014]
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
नीचे दिए गए चार समूहों में उस समूह को ज्ञात कीजिए जो दिए गए समूह के समान है। (13:20:27) [SSC (10+2) 2013]
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
नीचे दी गयी श्रेणी में लुप्त पद ज्ञात करो। BZA, DYC, FXE, ?, JVI
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
नीचे दी गयी श्रेणी में लुप्त पद ज्ञात कीजिये BZA, DYC, FXE, ?, JVI
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
एक कूट भाषा में 'KAVERI' को 'VAKIRE' लिखा जाता है। उसी कूट भाषा में 'MYSORE' को क्या लिखा जायेगा?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
यदि GOLD को IQNF लिखा जाता है तो WIND को क्या लिखा जायेगा?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Railway SSC Maths Reasoning GK Quiz ™” (@Railway_SSC_Maths_Reasoning_Quiz), 225,543 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Railway_SSC_Maths_Reasoning_Quiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.