Engagement
5 posts held, back to 2 April 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
18 Nov 2022, 22:50 UTC112 viewsread 11 August 2026 Und Bot sprach: "Liebe Leut' in RaidsMainaschaff, ihr habt bedauerlicherweise in den letzten Tagen recht wenig miteinander geraidet. Offenbar wird der Kanal nicht benötigt und wird erstmal abgeschaltet - kann aber von euren Admins hier jederzeit wieder gestartet werden!" 🧐😎
Signed MyPGoBot
18 Nov 2022, 08:03 UTC115 viewsread 11 August 2026 Raids sind jetzt angeschaltet!
Signed MyPGoBot
15 Dec 2021, 10:49 UTC364 viewsread 11 August 2026 Bitte den Kanal auch für Raidverabredungen nutzen, ansonsten wird er irgendwann nicht mehr mit Raidmeldungen via @MyPGoBot versorgt.
Signed Keksi Krümel
21 Jul 2019, 01:01 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 11 August 2026 📌 Herzlich Willkommen bei Raids Mainaschaff und Kleinostheim
💬 Es gibt divers andere Kanäle zur Terminvereinbarung für Raids, welche alle synchronisiert sind. Dort könnt ihr nicht schreiben (nur die jeweiligen Admins 😜).
Raid-Kanäle
✳️ https://t.me/PoGoRaidsAschaffenburg (Aschaffenburg HBF, 10 km Radius)
✳️ https://t.me/RaidsAB (Schloss Johannsiburg, 3 km Radius, Raids Level 4 und 5)
✳️ https://t.me/RaidsABKleine…
Signed Kerstin
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @RaidsMainaschaff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 966,483 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RaidsMainaschaff named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mypgoalzenau
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@mypgokahlammain
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@pokemongomainaschaff
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Raids Mainaschaff” (@RaidsMainaschaff), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RaidsMainaschaff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.