Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for محمد رفيق طاہر

Channel

محمد رفيق طاہر

@RafiqTahir1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

127subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001040275865
TypeChannel
Username@RafiqTahir1
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RafiqTahir1

Growth

127128127.57 August 2026 — 128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 127 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:13127-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:47128no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:10128first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1266.7%
👍633.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2024 to 30 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2025, 15:02 UTC103 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

رَبِّ ٱشۡرَحۡ لِی صَدۡرِی، وَیَسِّرۡ لِیۤ أَمۡرِی، وَٱحۡلُلۡ عُقۡدَةࣰ مِّن لِّسَانِی، یَفۡقَهُوا۟ قَوۡلِی

28 Jun 2025, 02:08 UTC108 viewsread 9 August 2026

رَبِّ اغْفِرْ لِي وَتُبْ عَلَيَّ، إِنَّكَ أَنْتَ التَّوَّابُ الْغَفُورُ

28 Jun 2025, 00:59 UTC109 viewsread 9 August 2026

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ عِيشَةً تَقِيَّةً، وَمِيتَةً سَوِيَّةً، وَمَرَدًّا غَيْرَ مُخْزٍ

28 Jun 2025, 00:56 UTC110 viewsread 9 August 2026

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنَ الْعَجْزِ وَالْكَسَلِ، وَالْجُبْنِ وَالْبُخْلِ وَالْهَرَمِ، وَعَذَابِ الْقَبْرِ، اللَّهُمَّ آتِ نَفْسِي تَقْوَاهَا، وَزَكِّهَا أَنْتَ خَيْرُ مَنْ زَكَّاهَا، أَنْتَ وَلِيُّهَا وَمَوْلَاهَا، اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ عِلْمٍ لَا يَنْفَعُ، وَمِنْ قَلْبٍ لَا يَخْشَعُ، وَمِنْ نَفْسٍ لَا تَشْبَعُ، وَمِنْ دَعْوَةٍ لَا يُسْتَجَابُ لَهَا

28 Jun 2025, 00:53 UTC106 viewsread 9 August 2026

رب ٱجۡعَل لِّی لِسَانَ صِدۡقࣲ فِی ٱلۡـَٔاخِرِینَ، وَٱجۡعَلۡنِی مِن وَرَثَةِ جَنَّةِ ٱلنَّعِیمِ

28 Jun 2025, 00:51 UTC104 viewsread 9 August 2026

#ادعیہ رب زدني علما وعملا ورزقا وعزا اللهم فقهني في الدين وعلمني التأويل اللَّهُم أكثر مالي وولدي وبارك لي فيما أعطيتني اللهم زدني بسطة في العلم والجسم

20 Oct 2024, 05:57 UTC254 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#اصول_فقہ #اجماع تعجب ہے کہ فقہائے کرام اجماع کے ثبوت میں آیات وأحاديث کے عموم سے استدلال کرتے ہیں، اور اس بات پہ سبھی متفق ہیں کہ عمومات سے کیے جانے والے استدلال کا متأول منکر نہ کافر ہوتا ہے اور نہ ہی اسے فاسق قرار دیا جاسکتا ہے. لیکن دوسری طرف کہتے ہیں کہ جس حکم پہ اجماع ہے، وہ قطعی ہے، اور اس کا مخالف کافر و فاسق ہے! گویا کہ انھوں نے فرع کو اصل سے بھی قوی بنا ڈالا، اور یہ عظیم غفلت ہے!

5

19 Oct 2024, 13:53 UTC243 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#اصول_فقہ #اجتہاد #اجماع زمانہء نبوت کے بعد، کتاب وسنت سے مستنبط کسی مسئلہ پہ، کسی زمانے کے تمام تر مجتہدین امت کا اتفاق اجماع کہلاتا ہے. یعنی تمام تر مجتہدین امت اس بات پہ متفق ہوتے ہیں کہ یہ مسئلہ صواب و درست ہے، اور اس بات پہ بھی متفق ہوتے ہیں کہ یہ مسئلہ درست ہونے کے باوجود محتمل للخطأ بھی ہے! اور ان تمام مجتہدین امت کا اس بات پہ بھی اتفاق ہوتا ہے کہ یہ اجتہاد میرے لیے تو حجت ہے، کسی اور کے لیے حجت نہیں!

1

19 Oct 2024, 11:50 UTC204 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#اصول_فقہ #اجتہاد مجتہدین امت کی اکثریت اگر کسی اجتہادی مسئلے پہ متفق ہو، تب بھی وہ رائے محتمل للخطأ رہتی ہے. کیونکہ وہ سبھی اگر اس رائے کے صواب ہونے پہ متفق ہیں، تو اس کے محتمل للخطأ ہونے پہ بھی متفق ہیں.

1

19 Oct 2024, 11:50 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#اصول_فقہ #اجماع اجماع کی تعریف پہ ہی اجماع نہیں ہو سکا...!

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RafiqTahir1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محمد رفيق طاہر” (@RafiqTahir1), 127 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RafiqTahir1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.