Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أكاديمية رفيق العمر

Channel

أكاديمية رفيق العمر

@Rafekolomrquraany

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,779subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001694452621
TypeChannel
Username@Rafekolomrquraany
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rafekolomrquraany

Growth

2,7522,7792,765.55 September 2026 — 2,752 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,752 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,767 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,779 subscribers5 September 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 11 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,748–2,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:002,779+12
12 Sept 2026, 03:172,767+15
5 Sept 2026, 04:222,752no change
5 Sept 2026, 03:472,752first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.77%
avg views ÷ 2,779 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.965%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held19 (2 September 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total2,521
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 41s
Average length
3m 20s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 05:33 UTC102 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @itsTheQuraanVideo

موعدنا اليوم مع الجزء الثامن من القرآن ، ومع : 💭 سورة الأعراف ...سورة الميثاق والميقات 💭 🎙 مقطع من الدرس الثالث ضمن سلسلة : من هدايات القرآن في سوره وأجزائه #الجزء_الثامن #إنه_القرآن #بنيان_مرصوص

4 Sept 2026, 03:53 UTC103 viewsread 5 September 2026
File

تلاوة جميلة خاشعة لسورة الأعراف

4 Sept 2026, 03:09 UTC153 viewsread 5 September 2026
Video

🌿 📗 [ حاجتك إلى القرآن بالظبط ]: 👈 كحاجتك إلى الماء.. 👈 كحاجة الجسد إلى الروح.. 👈 كحاجة الأرض إلى الغيث. 💥📗 اجعل علاقتك بالقرآن علاقة حياة حُب بينك وبين الورد القرآني وتفرح به. #افتح_مصحفك 📖

3 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC138 viewsread 5 September 2026

🌿 ما المشاعر التي نستصحبها معنا ونحن نقرأ القرآن حتى نخرج من القرآن بأكبر استفادة ⁉️ 1️⃣ شعور الاحتياج. 2️⃣ إحساس أن تكتفي بالقرآن عن غيره. 3️⃣ التعامل مع القرآن على إنه حقائق. 4️⃣ العمل بالقرآن. #مشاعرنا_اتجاه_القرآن #د_أحمد_عبد_المنعم #تطبيق_عملي

3 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC139 viewsread 5 September 2026

🌿 (واصبر فإن الله لا يضيع أجر المحسنين) [هود 115] 👈 أبشِر أيها المحسنُ بالخيرِ العظيم، مهما كان إحسانُك قليلًا أو كثيرًا، لازمًا أو متعدِّيًا؛ فإن اللهَ لن يُضيعَ أجرَك، ولن يُذهبَ إحسانَك. #مصحف_التدبر

3 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC137 viewsread 5 September 2026

🌿 النبي ﷺ كان إذا قرأ القرآن نَشِطَ وتفاعل وبكى .. كان يَمرُ مرةً في طريق من طُرُقات المدينة فسَمِعَ تاليًا يتلو في قيام الليل: (( هل أتاكَ حديثُ الغاشية ؟! )) فأَخذَ النبي ﷺ يبكي ويقول: ( أتاني.. أتاني 😭😭 ) والقاريءُ كلما يُكرِرُها يقول النبي ﷺ وهو يبكي : (أتاني.. أتاني). 💥 هذا كان حاله ﷺ بكاء وتفاعُل وخشوع وانكسارٌ مع القرآن وانتفاعٌ بالقرآن بعده في زيادة أعمال الخير والبر والقُرُبات إلى الله سبحانه وتعالى وعلى هذ…

3 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026

🌿📗 كان عثمان بن عفان رضي الله عنه يقول: 👈 (( واللّٰهِ لو طَهُرَت قلوبُكُم ما شَبِعَت من كلام رَبِكُم )) #القرآن #الشيخ_أحمد_العربي #تطبيق_عملي

❤1

3 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

"من سار على الدربِ وصل" 🕊🎈 ‏وأيُ دَربٍ ألذّ من دربِ حفظ القرآن وتعلّمه ؟ ‏ثق أنّك لن تبلغ مجدًا ولن تصل للمعالي ‏إلا بالصبـر على عثرات الطريق ، إلا بتجاوزها ، إلا بالمجاهدة ، إلا بالاستعانة بالله واليقين به ، والدعاء بأن يمدك الله بالعون والقوة فلولاه ما شققت طريقًا ولا بلغت مجدًا ..♥️♥️

❤1

3 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

لا تزاحِم مع القرآن غيره آثِره بوقتك يؤثرك بفضله.♥️

❤1

3 Sept 2026, 05:35 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Video

سماع القرآن له أثر عظيم في النفوس ومن ذلك إصلاحها وانشراحها والمساهمة في شفائها تليّن القلب تفتح على القلب آفاق البصيرة وتُهذّب الجوارح ولو بعد حين .. #قلبك_محتاج_قران ❣️ #القرآن_أولاً

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Rafekolomrquraany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ذكر الله حياة القلب
@zekrrallah · 28,705
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
أحكام التجويد للمبتدئين والمعلمين
@etgweed · 32,822
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
📚بدون رسوم مجانية قناه القرآن والسنة حياتي للداعية ميساء احمد قطان 🕌📚
@qttanmaisaa · 26,132
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أكاديمية رفيق العمر” (@Rafekolomrquraany), 2,779 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rafekolomrquraany.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.