Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for انجمن علمی رادیولوژی

Channel

انجمن علمی رادیولوژی

@Radiology_association

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,100subscribers

+185 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001789261648
TypeChannel
Username@Radiology_association
Description☤انجمن رادیولوژی شبکه نخبگان ایران® ● مَـرجـع آمـوزشی، پژوهـشی و فنّاورانه حـوزهٔ رادیولوژی و هوش ‌مصنوعی ℹ︎▸ www.stusciradio.com 👤 روابط عمومی: @Radiology_Association_Admin 📧 [email protected] ○ وابسـته به شبـکهٔ نخـبگان ایـران |@IranElitesNet|
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Radiology_association

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9158,1008,007.56 August 2026 — 7,915 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,915 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,916 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,921 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,943 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,960 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,966 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,972 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,969 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,965 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,972 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,975 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,978 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,990 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,007 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,015 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,037 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,049 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,064 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,070 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,071 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,070 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,072 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,097 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,100 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net +185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,887–8,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 20:008,100+3
4 Nov 2026, 22:478,097+25
1 Nov 2026, 15:058,072+2
29 Oct 2026, 08:318,070-1
26 Oct 2026, 13:468,071+1
23 Oct 2026, 10:418,070+6
20 Oct 2026, 13:058,064+15
17 Oct 2026, 02:568,049+12
14 Oct 2026, 04:588,037+22
10 Oct 2026, 13:208,015+8
4 Oct 2026, 19:588,007+17
25 Sept 2026, 10:587,990+12
15 Sept 2026, 08:207,978+3
12 Sept 2026, 02:397,975+3
8 Sept 2026, 00:417,972+7
3 Sept 2026, 06:467,965-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:287,969-3
24 Aug 2026, 08:137,972+6
20 Aug 2026, 05:127,966+6
17 Aug 2026, 11:547,960first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 8,100 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held61 (20 June 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total35,730
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 12:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
447
Videos
105
Links
578

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 43s
Average length
6m 22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 50 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16456.2%
🔥3913.4%
👍237.88%
❤‍🔥217.19%
👌175.82%
💯72.40%
😍72.40%
🤩62.05%
🥰41.37%
👏20.685%
🙏20.685%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (20.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC528 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🌍 روز جهانی رادیولوژی مبارک! امروز ۱۷ آبان ۱۴۰۵ (۸ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶)، پانزدهمین روز جهانی رادیولوژی است؛ روزی برای یادآوری نقش اساسی رادیولوژی در مسیر بیمار: تشخیص زودتر، جراحی کمتر و درمان بهتر. انجمن رادیولوژی شبکهٔ نخبگان ایران این روز را به همه رادیولوژیست‌ها، رزیدنت‌ها و همکاران تصویربرداری تبریک می‌گوید. #IDoR2026 #رادیولوژی ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎗 در انجمن رادیولوژی شبکهٔ نخبگان ایران با ما همراه باشید… ✅ @Radiology_Associ…

❤12❤‍🔥3😍2

7 Nov 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,060 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📰 اخبار هوش مصنوعی در پزشکی مهم‌ترین تحولات هفتهٔ گذشته در هوش مصنوعی پزشکی و رادیولوژی؛ از تشخیص بهتر آنوریسم مغزی تا مجوزهای تازهٔ FDA. --- 1️⃣ هوش مصنوعی ۳۹٪ آنوریسم مغزی بیشتری را در سی‌تی آنژیوگرافی یافت در مطالعه‌ای آینده‌نگر در نورث‌ول، الگوریتم هوش مصنوعی Aidoc روی ۳٬۸۵۶ سی‌تی آنژیوگرافی مغز در حالت «سایه» اجرا شد و ۵۵ آنوریسم واقعی را یافت که در گزارش رادیولوژیست‌ها از قلم افتاده بود. حساسیت هوش مصنوعی ۸۴٫۶٪…

❤3

7 Nov 2026, 22:04 UTC581 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📰 اخبار هوش مصنوعی در پزشکی متن کامل در پیام بعد 👇

7 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC762 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📊 AI in Radiology:AI in Radiology Reporting Quality: Automated Consistency Checks and Follow-Up Recommendations” 🤖🏥 هوش مصنوعی به‌سرعت در حال تبدیل‌شدن به یکی از ابزارهای مهم در رادیولوژی است؛ از تشخیص ضایعات در تصاویر پزشکی گرفته تا کمک به تصمیم‌گیری‌های بالینی. اما یک سؤال اساسی وجود دارد: چطور مطمئن شویم ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی واقعاً قابل اعتماد، معتبر و آماده استفاده در محیط بالینی هستند؟ 🧠🔍 یک مرور سیستماتیک جدید ب…

❤3

6 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC861 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🔍 کیس جمعه — تشخیص چیه؟ خانم ۲۷ ساله با ضعف پیش‌روندهٔ پای راست و پارستزی از ۲ سال قبل که در چند ماه اخیر تشدید شده است. در MRI ساژیتال T1 بدون کنتراست، توده‌ای هتروژن داخل‌مدولاری در کونوس مدولاریس دیده می‌شود که حاوی چربی (سیگنال بالای T1) و کلسیفیکاسیون‌های کوچک است؛ چربی، کانال مرکزی را بالای توده نیز پر کرده است. --- ✅ پاسخ: تومور درموئید پاره‌شدهٔ نخاع — تودهٔ هتروژن داخل‌مدولاری کونوس با اجزای چربی و کلسیفیکاس…

❤6

6 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC785 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🔍 کیس جمعه — تشخیص چیه؟ متن کامل و پاسخ در پیام بعد 👇

❤5

5 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC935 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🎯 یک تصویر، یک نکته IR بیمار سالمند با هماتوم ساب‌دورال مزمن علامت‌دار که پس از تخلیه جراحی عود کرده یا در معرض خطر بالای عود است — به‌ویژه با مصرف ضد انعقاد یا هماتوم دوطرفه. منشأ عود، خون‌رسانی غشای نئوممبران دورال از شریان مننژیال میانی است. ✅ نکته اجرایی: آمبولیزاسیون شریان مننژیال میانی (MMAE) با ماده آمبولیک مایع، به‌عنوان مکمل تخلیه جراحی، در کارآزمایی EMBOLISE نیاز به جراحی مجدد در ۹۰ روز را از ۱۱٫۳٪ به ۴٫۱٪ …

🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC788 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🎯 یک تصویر، یک نکته IR آمبولیزاسیون شریان مننژیال میانی (MMAE) در هماتوم ساب‌دورال مزمن متن کامل در پیام بعد 👇

👍2

4 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC962 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Congenital Inborn Errors of Metabolism: Clinical and Imaging Pearls 📝 خطاهای مادرزادی متابولیسم؛ مرواریدهای بالینی و تصویربرداری تصویربرداری نورومتابولیک کودکان یکی از پیچیده‌ترین حوزه‌های نورورادیولوژی کودکان است، اما با یک چارچوب درست، فهرست افتراقی‌ها به‌سرعت باریک می‌شود. این مرور RadioGraphics نخست طبقه‌بندی کنونی اختلالات متابولیک را با تمرکز بر ویژگی‌های بالینی و تصویربرداری مرور می‌کند و سپس ۹ اختلال نورومت…

🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC678 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📝 خطاهای مادرزادی متابولیسم؛ مرواریدهای بالینی و تصویربرداری (RadioGraphics 2025)

4 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC813 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection of Pulmonary Embolism on CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) ۱. مقدمه آمبولی ریه (PE) یکی از اورژانس‌های مهم پزشکی است و سی‌تی آنژیوگرافی شریان‌های ریوی (CTPA) روش اصلی تصویربرداری برای تشخیص آن محسوب می‌شود. هوش مصنوعی مبتنی بر یادگیری عمیق می‌تواند نواحی مشکوک به ترومبوز را شناسایی کرده و به رادیولوژیست در تشخیص و اولویت‌بندی بررسی‌های اورژانسی کمک کند. ۲. سناریوی بالینی ب…

🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC776 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026

✅ پاسخ صحیح: ج — سکوستراسیون ریوی توده ریوی غیرفعال بدون ارتباط با درخت تراکئوبرونش که خون‌رسانی سیستمیک غیرطبیعی دارد (در این بیمار از آئورت نزولی)، سکوستراسیون داخل‌لوبی است؛ آنژیوگرافی سی‌تی استاندارد طلایی تشخیص و تعیین آناتومی عروقی است. (Wani و همکاران، ۲۰۱۵) ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎗️ در انجمن رادیولوژی شبکهٔ نخبگان ایران با ما همراه باشید… ✅ @Radiology_Association ☢️ 🌐 www.stusciradio.com 🤖 📱 Stu.sci.radio ⚙️️ Insta Cha…

❤2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @Radiology_association. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Radiology_association as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
11 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTCAnonymous Poll179 voters

در پسر ۲ساله با پنومونی مکرر موضعی و توده چندحفره‌ای لوب تحتانی چپ در سی‌تی، محتمل‌ترین تشخیص کدام است؟

  1. الف) ناهنجاری مادرزادی راه هوایی ریوی (CPAM)35%
  2. ب) کیست برونکوژنیک22%
  3. ج) سکوستراسیون ریوی36%
  4. د) مالفورماسیون شریانی‌وریدی ریوی7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مرکز المپیادهای علمی علوم پزشکی
@Olympiad_Med · 20,643
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
شبکه نخبگان ایران
@IranElitesNet · 28,377
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 10 September 2026
پزشکان سهمیه‌ای
@pezeshkan_sahmiei · 19,853
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
نکات دستیاری | MedicalPoint
@medicalpoint100 · 19,053
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 October 2026
BOOK | کتاب
@BooksCom · 60,617
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“انجمن علمی رادیولوژی” (@Radiology_association), 8,100 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Radiology_association.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.