Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Radar Politic

Channel

Radar Politic

@RadarPolitic

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,246subscribers

-149 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166008511
TypeChannel
Username@RadarPolitic
Descriptionradarpolitic.md - proiect media destinat oamenilor care gândesc critic. Sunt și pe YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/RadarPolitic
Created11 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RadarPolitic

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RadarPolitic/31582 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC@Moldova_20/239935 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC0.9841 minutes
@RadarPolitic/31584 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC@Moldova_20/240016 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC0.9822 hours
@RadarPolitic/30474 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC@Moldova_20/219497 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC0.9822 hours
@RadarPolitic/31581 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC@Moldova_20/239915 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC0.9869 minutes
@RadarPolitic/30473 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC@Moldova_20/219487 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC0.9822 hours
@RadarPolitic/31541 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 08:21 UTC@Moldova_20/239522 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC0.9784 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Moldova_2010 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.966.3 hoursthis entry (10–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 182 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,2467,3957,320.56 August 2026 — 7,395 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,395 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,394 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,392 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,383 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,380 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,373 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,364 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,358 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,355 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,346 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,345 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,324 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,323 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,321 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,306 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,303 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,288 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,281 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,276 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,277 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,280 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,275 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,270 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,262 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,263 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,256 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,246 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 97 days, net -149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,224–7,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:517,246-10
7 Nov 2026, 14:447,256-7
4 Nov 2026, 05:087,263+1
1 Nov 2026, 15:257,262-8
29 Oct 2026, 09:297,270-5
26 Oct 2026, 02:407,275-5
22 Oct 2026, 20:297,280+3
20 Oct 2026, 00:117,277+1
17 Oct 2026, 00:307,276-5
14 Oct 2026, 10:517,281-7
10 Oct 2026, 17:377,288-15
4 Oct 2026, 21:377,303-3
25 Sept 2026, 17:227,306-15
17 Sept 2026, 12:597,321-2
13 Sept 2026, 05:007,323-1
9 Sept 2026, 04:557,324-21
3 Sept 2026, 17:167,345-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:157,346-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:587,355-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:537,358first reading

Engagement

211 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 7,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
800
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 211 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held211 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total87,214
Reactions total1,262
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,870
Videos
≈6,690
Links
≈10,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 33m
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 92 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,255 reactions across 206 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤36616.2%
👍31714.1%
🔥23810.6%
👏2139.45%
🤡1737.67%
💯1335.90%
😁1185.23%
💩1114.92%
🤮1064.70%
🤣853.77%
👌552.44%
🤯552.44%
🖕401.77%
🫡331.46%
🙏271.20%
🤔271.20%
🆒261.15%
⚡241.06%
🤬170.754%
❤‍🔥130.576%
16 further kinds783.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 206 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 111 posts held from the last 30 days (4.50%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC267 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Contabilul soției lui Călin Georgescu, contractat de Moldovagaz să auditeze datoria față de Gazprom - investigație TVR Moldova. "Călin Georgescu, politician catalogat ca fiind pro rus și Moldovagaz, compania fiică a Gazprom. Interesul rusesc la mijloc sau simplă coincidență? (...) Cel mai interesant este că acel audit stabilea circa 753 de milioane de dolari — cu peste 40 de milioane mai mult decât suma de 709 milio…

🔥2😁1

11 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC457 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🇺🇦🇪🇺 Zelenski: „În această iarnă vom testa primul sistem european de apărare antirachetă balistică.”

❤6🔥2👏1🤣1🫡1

11 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC481 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Dragoș Galbur ⚔️ Bogdan Țîrdea

👏7❤3🔥1🆒1

11 Nov 2026, 13:55 UTC533 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🇲🇩🇷🇺 MAE condamnă încălcarea spațiului aerian al R. Moldova de către două rachete de croazieră de tip Banderol. Potrivit Ministerului Afacerilor Externe, incidentul din 11 noiembrie reprezintă o încălcare gravă a suveranității R. Moldova și o amenințare la adresa securității cetățenilor 🇲🇩🇺🇳 Vasile Tofan participă la Conferința ONU privind schimbările climatice din Turcia. Prim-ministrul R. Moldova a avut întreveder…

👌3🤣2🤡1🙉1

11 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC554 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🇲🇩🇪🇺🇷🇴 Unirea cu România, cale alternativă spre UE? Marta Kos: „Modul în care veți adera este decizia voastră”

👍11❤2😁1

11 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC712 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Datoria Transnistriei pentru gazul rusesc constituie astăzi peste 11,6 miliarde de dolari este datoria Moldovagaz. Vadim Ceban, directorul Moldovagaz, spune că această datorie nu-i vizează pe consumatorii de pe malul drept al Nistrului. "Este datoria Moldovagaz ca întreprindere comercială unde Gazprom deține peste 50% din acțiuni plus un vot, iar împreună cu Transnistria deține 63,5%. Aceste datorii sunt ale celor …

🔥2😁1

11 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC692 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🇷🇺🇲🇩 Rusia a decis să expulzeze un angajat al Ambasadei Republicii Moldova la Moscova, ca reacție la măsura similară adoptată anterior de autoritățile de la Chișinău în privința unui diplomat rus. (...) Diplomatul rus a fost expulzat după ce o dronă de tip „Gheran”, identificată de autoritățile de la Chișinău drept un aparat de proveniență rusească, s-a prăbușit în apropierea satului Chiștelnița, raionul Telenești. …

👌2🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC629 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇦⚔️🇷🇺 În această noapte a fost atacată infrastructura portuară din Ust-Luga, regiunea Leningrad. Incendiul izbucnit în urma atacurilor a fost vizibil chiar și din Estonia. Guvernatorul regiunii Leningrad din Federația Rusă, Aleksandr Drozdenko, susține că deasupra regiunii ar fi fost doborâte 150 de drone. Totodată, el a recunoscut că „mai multe” drone au atacat zona portuară Ust-Luga. Acest port a fost inaugurat…

👏10❤‍🔥1🔥1🫡1

11 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC682 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🇬🇧🇨🇳🇺🇸🇷🇺🇹🇼 Fostul șef al MI6, Richard Moore, despre planurile militare ale Chinei: „Xi Jinping urmărește cu foarte mare atenție ceea ce se întâmplă în Ucraina. De asemenea, urmărește evoluțiile din jurul Iranului. Pericolul este că, dacă liderii chinezi ajung să creadă că Occidentul și, în special, Statele Unite nu au voința necesară pentru a-i înfrunta și învinge pe lideri precum Putin sau chiar regimul iranian, X…

🔥4❤1👌1

11 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC639 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

‼În contextul atacurilor masive ale Federației Ruse asupra Ucrainei, sistemul național integrat de monitorizare informează despre pătrunderea în spațiul aerian national a doua rachete de croazieră de tip Banderol (S8000). Prima racheta a traversat frontiera de stat la ora 06.04 din direcția localității Iaski, regiunea Odesa, Ucraina spre localitatea Tudora, raionul Ștefan Vodă cu părăsirea spațiului aerian național…

🤔4🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC859 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🇵🇪 În Peru, primarul a fost ales prin aruncarea unei monede în aer. La alegerile dintr-o mică localitate din Peru, doi candidați au obținut același număr de voturi: câte 671 fiecare. Potrivit legislației locale, în astfel de situații, câștigătorul este desemnat prin tragere la sorți. De această dată, autoritățile au decis să arunce pur și simplu o monedă în aer. Norocul a fost de partea lui Rubén Quispe, candidatu…

😁8⚡7👏5🤣1

10 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC857 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Dodon poate aduce gaz mai ieftin din Rusia? Vadim Ceban: Se poate, dar sunt mulți pași de parcurs. Energocom sau VestMoldTransgaz nu pot interveni. La întrebarea dacă Energocom ar putea să interzică agentului economic pe care Igor Dodon spune că l-a identificat, ca să aducă gaz mai ieftin din Rusia, directorul Moldovagaz, Vadim Ceban, explică că nimeni nu poate interveni și interzice acest lucru, piața gazelor fiind…

🔥3👍1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @RadarPolitic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RadarPolitic edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 November 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTCAnonymous Poll193 voters

Ce notă acordați Guvernului Tofan după primele 100 de zile?

  1. 1 - 434%
  2. 5 - 728%
  3. 820%
  4. 910%
  5. 109%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTCAnonymous Poll191 voters

În scandalul legat de cereale și Portul Giurgiulești, cui îi dați dreptate?

  1. Vasile Costiuc28%
  2. Vasile Tofan52%
  3. Nu știu20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

INDEX🇲🇩 CREDIBIL
@indexMLD · 20,662
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
Moldova NEWS
@moldovanewsmd · 50,355
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
luchianiuc.com
@luchianiuc_com · 24,478
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
spovedanialuirizeaofficial
@spovedanialuirizeaofficial · 27,453
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
Poliția Republicii Moldova
@Politia_Republicii_Moldova · 33,415
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
OBSERVATORUL
@observatorul · 20,692
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
ȘTIRI.MD
@stirimd · 37,714
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
GALBEN (Dorin Galben)
@galbendorin · 25,226
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Redactia.md
@Redactia_MD · 35,174
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Ungureanu 112
@Ungureanu112 · 46,722
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Moldova Liberă
@moldovalibera · 43,195
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Point.md
@PointNews · 61,287
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Кишинёв в теме
@vtememd · 77,002
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Новости Приднестровья | ПМР
@novostipmrcom · 22,395
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Radar Politic” (@RadarPolitic), 7,246 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadarPolitic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.