Channel
@RadPhysEng
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
85subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001977166594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RadPhysEng |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 8 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RadPhysEng |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 85 | -2 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 87 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 86 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 88 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 88 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
82 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 72.0% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 19.5% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 8.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2023 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔸 The latest issue (Summer 2026) has been published. 🔹 Issue 3 of Volume 7, Radiation Physics and Engineering. ✅ Download for FREE 📎 See current issue 1. Proton therapy enhancement with gold, platinum, and iridium nanoparticle: A cellular-scale Geant4-DNA study https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2026.575951.1345 2.Monte Carlo-based numerical assessment of metal and metal oxide nanoparticle parameters on cellular do…
❤3
🔸 The latest issue (Spring 2026) has been published. 🔹 Issue 2 of Volume 7, Radiation Physics and Engineering. ✅ Download for FREE 📎 See current issue 1. Characterization of waste materials and its application towards sustainable radiation protection https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2026.552271.1307 2. A computational approach for assessing calibration factors of narrow beam X-ray dosimeters at the SSDL: A feasibilit…
❤2
🔸 The latest issue (Winter 2026) has been published. 🔹 Issue 1 of Volume 7, Radiation Physics and Engineering. ✅ Download for FREE 📎 See current issue 1. Comparative GEANT4-based Monte Carlo dosimetry of I-125 and Pd-103 in soft tissue, blood, and adipose tissue https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2025.550493.1303 2. Dosimetric evaluation of TLD calcium phosphate pellets produced by SPS and PLS sintering methods https:/…
❤4
🔸 The latest issue (Autumn 2025) has been published. 🔹 Issue 4 of Volume 6, Radiation Physics and Engineering. ✅ Download for FREE 📎 See current issue 1- Impact of polymer shielding layer on absorbed dose distribution in an 18 MeV LINAC treatment room: A FLUKA simulation study https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2025.499830.1262 2- Uncertainty investigation of Cs-134/Cs-137 activity ratio method in determination of the …
❤3
🔸 Radiation Physics and Engineering (RPE) is now an official member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 🔹 COPE is a globally recognized organization that promotes integrity in scholarly research and publishing. As a member, our journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of ethical publishing practices, including transparency, accountability, and the responsible conduct of research. ✅ We than…
❤4
🔸 The latest issue (Summer 2025) has been published. 🔹 Issue 3 of Volume 6, Radiation Physics and Engineering. ✅ Download for FREE 📎 See current issue 1- Dosimetry and analysis of the delayed gamma rays emitted from the irradiated holder device used in Mo-99 production facilities https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2024.475273.1238 2- Nuclear symmetry energy and its role in the thermodynamic instabilities of nuclear mat…
❤4
🔸 The latest issue (Spring 2025) has been published. 🔹 Issue 2 of Volume 6, Radiation Physics and Engineering. ✅ Download for FREE 📎 See current issue 1- The empirical correlation for forced convection heat transfer of homogeneous hybrid nanofluid TiO2/Al2O3 in a non-uniform heat flux test section https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2024.467155.1203 2- Characterization of coal gangue for recovery of lithium as a fusion…
❤2👎1
🔸 The latest issue (Winter 2025) has been published. 🔹 Issue 1 of Volume 6, Radiation Physics and Engineering. 📎 See current issue 1- RELAP5 code investigation on operational characteristics of passive siphon breaker line in research reactors under LOCA conditions. https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2024.471407.1231 2- Lithium borohydride (LiBH4): An innovative material for neutron radiation shielding. https://doi.org/1…
❤3👎1
Radiation Physics and Engineering pinned a photo
The editorial team of Radiation Physics and Engineering (RPE) Journal is very thrilled to announce that RPE has been accepted for indexing in Scopus. RPE is an open access publishing collection that strives to provide a high-quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific papers on the development and the enhancement of nuclear physics and nuclear engineering researches at the national as w…
❤4👎1
✅ Radiation Physics and Engineering (RPE) @RadPhysEng
❤4👎1
🔸 The latest issue (Autumn 2024) has been published. 🔹 Issue 4 of Volume 5, Radiation Physics and Engineering. 📎 See current issue 1- Experimental investigation of the effect of oxygen on the positron annihilation mechanisms in liquids. https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2024.467750.1212 2- Investigation of the energy response of thermoluminescence dosimeter used for measurement of individual dose-equivalent. https://do…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RadPhysEng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Radiation Physics and Engineering” (@RadPhysEng), 85 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadPhysEng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.