Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rachele Zinzocchi

Channel

Rachele Zinzocchi

@RacheleZinzocchi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

721subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001010973329
TypeChannel
Username@RacheleZinzocchi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RacheleZinzocchi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7187227205 August 2026 — 722 subscribers6 August 2026 — 722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 720 subscribers26 August 2026 — 718 subscribers10 September 2026 — 721 subscribers7215 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 36 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 717–723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 13:57721+3
26 Aug 2026, 11:24718-2
12 Aug 2026, 19:07720-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:15722no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:09722first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 May 2025, 05:43 UTC≈4,610 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🎙️ “Booking.com? Mafia.” Non lo dico io. Lo dice un operatore Booking. In una telefonata vera. La prima parte ti ha scioccato? Questa è peggio. Audio vero, voce distorta, parole che pesano come macigni. Non è una mia battaglia personale. È una battaglia per la verità, l’onestà, la trasparenza, la giustizia. 📍 Guarda tutto. 📩 E scrivimi se anche tu hai vissuto qualcosa di simile. #BookingMafia #InchiestaTikTok #Truth

26 May 2025, 05:41 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

“Booking.com? Mafia.” ⚠️ Non è un meme. È una registrazione vera. Mi è arrivata per caso. Ma io sono una giornalista. E racconto quello che altri vogliono nascondere. 🎧 Voce distorta per proteggere la fonte. 🎬 Guarda il primo video. Il resto… arriva tra poche ore. Segui il mio profilo. #BookingMafia #VeritàScomode #InchiestaDigitale #HostSottoAttacco #RacheleZinzocchi #JournalistOnTikTok

16 May 2025, 06:41 UTC≈3,430 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Dicono che i social siano liberi. Poi pubblichi un’inchiesta su Booking.com, e all’improvviso… qualcosa si blocca. Video nascosti. Pagina declassata. Monetizzazione rimossa. Ma la verità non si ferma. I numeri parlano chiaro. Le persone ascoltano. E io, semplicemente, non mi zittisco. 🔗 Leggi l’inchiesta → https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dopo-aver-denunciato-bookingcom-hanno-provato-ma-i-numeri-zinzocchi-cecjf 🎥 Gua

15 May 2025, 04:29 UTC≈2,980 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

📢 *Booking.com ha fatto firmare a milioni di host una clausola che… non esiste.* Ho contattato lo studio legale indicato nel contratto. L’indirizzo email non funziona. Le mediatrici confermano: la procedura è obsoleta. ❌ Nessuno può più far finta di niente. 🎥 Qui trovi il *video completo* con tutti i dettagli, le prove, le email, i nomi. 🧠 Nessuna censura. Solo la verità. 👇 Guarda e condividi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RacheleZinzocchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rachele Zinzocchi” (@RacheleZinzocchi), 721 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RacheleZinzocchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.