Channel
@RachelVaughan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,342subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001294163472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RachelVaughan |
| Description | SRA survivor and whistleblower |
| Created | 16 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RachelVaughan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 5,342 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 5,345 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 5,345 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (4 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,980 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Lions Gate Portal - August energies with Alexandra Merrick & Rachel Vaughan - 8th August 2026 This is the first in a new series of talks with my beautiful friend Alexandra Merrick. Alex & I will be discussing frequencies, prophesies, psychic abilities, & Earth energies. Which we will be uploading to our channels whenever we feel inspired to do so. Those who have taken my psychic development courses will know Alex …
Loving Mark Attwood’s new Youtube channel – The Healing House. I did a little dig around Frybrook House using some of the footage of the property which Mark shared (in Part 2), as well as an internet search, & I found the ley lines in the location are pretty spectacular. I’m hoping to get over there for a proper scout around in 2027: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bke9VFSw9KI Channel address: https://www.youtube.…
Tartaria Australia event Vic🚨 EARLY BIRD TICKETS END THIS FRIDAY 7 AUGUST 🚨 (sharing this for Kel & Campbell - I will be there with Dale, Nikki & Paula too!) The world has become a lot more expensive. Venues, travel, accommodation and running live events have all gone up. Unfortunately, that means our ticket prices have had to increase too. But here's the thing... The value of a Tartaria Australia Live weekend has…
My latest interview, this time with beautiful Chanti Meyburgh of Aquarius Rising Africa. This time we discuss reincarnation of our animal companions, and the fact they are our spirit guides in physical, often furry form 😇 https://www.youtube.com/live/uz5cxpAI9Ac?si=8s2LlmtR5RarSq23
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER SERIES #18 - BRAD SPALI & BRONWYN HOLM Brad Spali - Greenclean founder, is an active weather worker & harmoniser from Down under set up to normalise the environment back to its original blue print. Working with Orgone, structured water and ancient soil microbes from Your Earth Food he plays his part in helping the earth with a humanitarian mission to create harmony within and without. www.natureha…
There is a poll to complain about the proposed Glenelg Norfolk Island Pine tree cull, but you might have to sign up & pay for the Advertiser to do so - which no-one in their right mind should do! Instead post about your disgust all over social media. Call the council & tell them how you feel. My previous uploads on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVBwmSTzGns&t=3s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVIlYkZZ…
In April I posted an update on my channels about the systematic attack on trees in South Australia, & all over the world at the moment, & how this is part of the SMART city agenda. In my April upload I complained that the train company SteamRanger is destroying trees all along the train line between Mount Barker & Victor Harbor. Not because they are damaging the tracks, because they POSE a risk! In that upload I al…
https://youtu.be/4bMdN7kCBtU?si=LJIRmCgaP3MqfYiC
My latest free Substack - part 4 on the Edwardstown tunnels I was trafficked through as a child. Apologies to those Australians who dont want to go on Substack because of the biometrics BS. You can access a download of my original, February 2021, 28 page article from a different site on the download below the Substack link. https://open.substack.com/pub/rachelvaughan177142/p/adelaides-child-trafficking-tunnel?r=txu…
Here is my latest interview, this time with my dear friend Dani Henderson. We discuss the mother of darkness (MOD) programming & how this effects people in the SRA & Mk Ultra community. Sadly some of the survivors who profess to having endured MOD programming have a tendency to attack other survivors whom they disagree with, whilst also ‘collecting’ the more vulnerable members of the community & mind controlling th…
My latest Substack - apologies if you cant access that platform because of the ridiculous ID 'requirements' in countries like Australia. This article is a follow up to my Zorro Ranch research shared in my interview with Alex Saunders on his Nuggets News channel in March this year. The next tranche of Epstein files looks close to releasing - it's going to get freaky! https://open.substack.com/pub/rachelvaughan17714…
https://gofund.me/5b647c52f
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @RachelVaughan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 16,624 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rachel Vaughan” (@RachelVaughan), 5,342 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RachelVaughan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.