Channel
@RabbimovJasur
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001742761890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RabbimovJasur |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RabbimovJasur |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 121 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 123 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 46.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 46.7% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
O‘zbekiston mustaqilligini birinchi bo‘lib tan olgan davlat bu ...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Telegram hisobida parolni tiklash uchun elektron pochta manzili bog‘langan bo‘lsa, xavfsizlik faqat messenjerning o‘ziga emas, balki e-mail himoyasiga ham bog‘liq bo‘lib qoladi. Agar hujumchi foydalanuvchining elektron pochtasiga kirish imkonini qo‘lga kiritsa, u parolni tiklash funksiyasidan foydalanib, Telegram hisobini nazoratiga olishi mumkin. Shu sababli ko‘plab foydalanuvchilar Telegram’dagi ikki bosqichli himo…
❤2
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Ikki yil ichida Telegram hisobim ikki marta o‘g‘irlandi. Eng hayratlanarlisi, hisobimda ikki bosqichli himoya paroli ham yoqilgan edi. Shunga qaramay, kimdir akkauntimga kirib olgan. Birinchi marta buni oddiy tasodif deb o‘ylagandim, lekin oradan vaqt o‘tib, shu holat yana takrorlangach, bu muammo qanchalik jiddiy ekanini his qildim. Yaxshiyamki, ikkinchi holat yuz berganida yangi olgan telefon raqamimga hali ko‘p t…
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Inson Vatanga faqat tuproq yoki chegaralar sabab bog‘lanmaydi. Uni bog‘laydigan narsa — xotira, til, bolalikdagi tovushlar, ota-onasining duosi va o‘zini kim ekanini his qildira oladigan ma’naviy ildizlardir. Shuning uchun ham Vatanga foyda keltirish oddiy xizmat emas, balki insonning o‘z ildizlariga bo‘lgan qarzini ado etishidir. Daraxt ildizidan uzilsa qurigani kabi, odam ham o‘z yurti bilan ma’naviy aloqasini yo‘q…
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Ba’zan odamlarga mehr bilan egilsang, ular buni odob emas, egarlashga tayyorlik deb tushunar ekan. Yumshoqlikni fazilat emas, minib olish mumkin bo‘lgan yelka deb bilishadi. Muloyimlik qilichsiz qalqon bo‘lsa-da, ayrimlar uni ojizlik deb o‘qiydi. Shunda anglaysan: har ko‘ngilga yo‘l berish — ba’zilar uchun seni yo‘l qilish bilan barobar. 👉 @Jasur_Usmon
😢1
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Bugungi ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda bir g‘alati holat tobora ko‘proq ko‘zga tashlanmoqda: dunyoning qayeridadir urush, qatag‘on yoki zulm haqida xabar chiqsa, izohlarda darhol boshqa bir fojia nomi takrorlana boshlaydi. Ayniqsa, ko‘plab mavzularda bir xil yo‘nalishdagi izohlar boshqa jabrlanayotgan xalqlarning dardini soyada qoldirayotgandek taassurot uyg‘otadi. Bu esa haqli savolni tug‘diradi: axir zulm ko‘rayotgan faqat b…
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Onlayn qimor — bu shunchaki vaqt o‘tkazish yoki “omad sinash” emas. U ko‘pincha insonning nafaqat pulini, balki ongini, oilaviy tinchligini, kelajagini va yaqinlari bilan bo‘lgan ishonchini ham sekin-asta yemiradigan xavfli illatdir. Dastlab oddiy qiziqish yoki kichik tikish bo‘lib ko‘ringan narsa vaqt o‘tib qarz, yolg‘on, ruhiy bosim va oilaviy inqirozga aylanishi mumkin. Eng achinarlisi, bu balo ko‘pincha insonni o…
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
“Olmaning yaxshisini eshak g‘ajiydi”, deyishlari bejiz emas ekan... Ba’zan inson eng qadrli narsasiga yetolmaydi, unga loyiq bo‘lmaganlar esa uning qadriga yetmay, qo‘ldan boy beradi. Eng achinarlisi esa — keyin hammasi kech bo‘ladi...
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
27 yoshga kiryapman... Shu vaqtgacha hayotimda faqat ikki qizga yuragimdagi eng samimiy tuyg‘ularimni ayta oldim. Ikkisiga ham niyatim jiddiy edi — “Agar rozilik bersang, sovchi qo‘yaman”, dedim. Bu o‘tkinchi hissiyot emas, chin dildan aytilgan gap edi. Ammo taqdir boshqacha ekan... Ikkovi ham ko‘proq oilasining qaroriga quloq tutib, boshqa inson bilan turmush qurdi. Men esa jim qarab qoldim... Kurashmaganimga esa h…
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
#Iqtibos Odamlarga "Dining nima?", "Roʻza tutasanmi"? kabi savollarni bermang. Bunday savol bilan bandani yolgʻiz Alloh soʻroq etishga haqlidir. Ularga "Ochmisan?", "Yeyishga taoming bormi?", "Senga qanday yordam bera olaman?", "Hammasi joyidami, muhtojliging yoʻqmi?" qabilidagi, bandalar orasida soʻralishi lozim boʻlgan savollarni bering. ©Fotih Sulton Mehmet 👉 @Jasur_Usmon
❤3
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
#Kitobdan_parchalar Paxta obrazi sanʼat, adabiyot orqali o‘zbek xalqining shuuriga shu qadar kuchli singdirildiki, haliga qadar bu obrazni «tarixiy» deb hisoblab yuribmiz. Misol uchun, sovet O‘zbekistoni davrida o‘zbeklarning naqshlariga, idishlariga, tasviriy sanʼatiga ustalik bilan paxta obrazi singdirildi. Bugun Toshkentdagi anʼanaviy milliy taomlar restoranlariga kirsangiz, yoki anʼanaviy o‘zbek xonadoniga mehmo…
❤2
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Sun’iy intellekt davrida kompyuter qismlari narxining keskin oshish sabablari So‘nggi yillarda sun’iy intellekt texnologiyalarining jadal rivojlanishi global texnologiya bozoriga sezilarli ta’sir ko‘rsatdi. Ayniqsa, kompyuter va uning ehtiyot qismlari — xususan, xotira qurilmalari narxining keskin oshishi ko‘pchilikni qiziqtirayotgan masalaga aylandi. Bu holat tasodifiy emas, balki bir nechta chuqur iqtisodiy va tex…
Signed ιɴvιɴcιʙʟᴇ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RabbimovJasur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
O‘zbekiston mustaqilligini birinchi bo‘lib tan olgan davlat bu ...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 28 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 130,439 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rabbimov Jasur (𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜)” (@RabbimovJasur), 121 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RabbimovJasur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.