вот так щас отдыхаю братва
custom 526707677200386775426

Channel
@RUSSIANGANGv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,268subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001824477092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RUSSIANGANGv |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RUSSIANGANGv |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 1,268 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 1,266 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 1,272 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 1,274 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 1,279 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,285 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 1,291 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 1,294 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 1,299 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,300 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 1,301 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 1,300 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 1,302 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 1,303 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 1,303 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
231 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5764764156196556790 | 55 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5339561869906559936 | 51 | 22.1% | |
| custom 5267076772003867754 | 49 | 21.2% | |
| custom 5201728239004827919 | 23 | 9.96% | |
| custom 5310237400872582160 | 22 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5310245651504720654 | 16 | 6.93% | |
| custom 5310270987516797848 | 10 | 4.33% | |
| custom 5332736840455697835 | 5 | 2.16% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RUSSIANGANGv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 May 2026 to 22 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
вот так щас отдыхаю братва
custom 526707677200386775426
⚡Ну что, можно подытожить неделю. Видео с бабулькой (ака ЭКО Лэнд) набрало 31 репост. Ну и действительно, если отойти от моральной стороны, то такие видео и правда очень редкие и впечатляющие. Всё-таки большую роль на восприятие здесь играет ещё и то, что это как бы «наше», что-то близкое и знакомое всем, произошедшее в обычном панельном районе нашей страны. Моя борьба с интернетом продолжается, так что роликов, во…
custom 526707677200386775413custom 53395618699065599362
𝘽𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣 𝙜𝙖𝙣𝙜
custom 57647641561965567909custom 52017282390048279192custom 53395618699065599362
𝙉𝙚𝙘𝙠
custom 520172823900482791910custom 53395618699065599363
𝘾𝙅𝙉𝙂
custom 57647641561965567908custom 53327368404556978353custom 53102456515047206542
Мексиканские картели осваивают новые технологии 🧑🌾
custom 57647641561965567909
𝙁𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙤𝙣
custom 53102709875167978486custom 53327368404556978352
Мать года 🐵
custom 531024565150472065412
𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧
custom 57647641561965567905custom 53102374008725821603
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53395618699065599369
𝙎𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙩-𝙋𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙗𝙪𝙧𝙜
custom 53395618699065599369
𝐕𝐢𝐛𝐞 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟎'𝐬
custom 533956186990655993618
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RUSSIANGANGv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐀𝐍 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐆” (@RUSSIANGANGv), 1,268 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RUSSIANGANGv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.