https://x.com/Ru7Longcrypto/status/2089013766969315660?s=20
❤1

Channel
@RU7LONGCRYPTO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,537subscribers
-161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002468754009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RU7LONGCRYPTO |
| Description | 纯公益传播无付费,提高警惕,以防被骗 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RU7LONGCRYPTO |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 8,537 | -66 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 8,603 | -35 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 8,638 | -58 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 8,696 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 8,698 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (28 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,142 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
56 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 53.6% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 8.93% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 7.14% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/Ru7Longcrypto/status/2089013766969315660?s=20
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰2❤1
cz 向giggle捐赠总价值96万美元的币安人生和BNB代币
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
$CASHCAT live on Robinhood spot
Kioxia利润率逼近80%,摩根大通上调其目标价至15.5万日元 - 链接
❤2
【【金融危机系列2】《商海通牒——Margin Call》40分钟 Leon万字解读 带你一口气看完 金融危机系列电影-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/vWQJ4QA
❤2
其实很像之前的巨鲸 ETH当时被机构逼平,其实不就是大鱼吃小鱼吗 前OpenAI研究员Leopold Aschenbrenner,24岁,创立Situational Awareness,$2.25亿起步,押注AI基础设施,两年做到$450亿,累计涨幅超1000%。 4倍杠杆,但AI股这个月跌了35%-47%,数学上,4倍杠杆遇上25%回撤就已经清零,最后Citadel捡便宜收入囊中。 想到了经典的电影《商海通牒》(Margin Call),讲的是一家投行深夜发现杠杆头寸超过公司承受极限,高层连夜开会,决定开盘第一时间把所有有毒资产全部清仓,不管价格,不管对手方,先活下去。 猎手只需要等高杠杆的人在波动市场里撑不住,等margin call发出来,然后做唯一的接盘方,用自己满意的价格把资产组合打包买走。 真正的猎手从不追猎物。它只需要设计好地形,流动性收紧、波动放大、margin call机制本身就是陷阱,然后等猎物自己…
👍5❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
https://x.com/ru7longcrypto/status/2082714610734698541?s=46
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @RU7LONGCRYPTO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 543,891 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ru7's OF” (@RU7LONGCRYPTO), 8,537 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RU7LONGCRYPTO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.