Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RTM chartist

Channel

RTM chartist

@RTMchartist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,250subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545986041
TypeChannel
Username@RTMchartist
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/RTMchartist

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2441,2501,24712 September 2026 — 1,247 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,246 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,245 subscribers26 September 2026 — 1,244 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,250 subscribers12 September 20265 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,243–1,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 05:411,250+6
26 Sept 2026, 19:201,244-1
17 Sept 2026, 23:581,245-1
13 Sept 2026, 10:371,246-1
12 Sept 2026, 06:221,247first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 1,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
243
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held18 (15 July 2025 – 10 September 2026)
Views total243
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🔄GU-UPDATE 📌داره میره برای حمله به ناحیه بعدی که احتمالا طبق سناریوی اصلی که توی ذهنم هست انگلف میشه و بعد از انگلف میتونه: A - ریتریس عمیق برای ناحیه جامونده پایین بسازه . B- لست تریک کنه و بعد مختصر ریتریسی ادامه بده 🛑البته اینا همش احتمالاتیه که طبق سناریوی اصلی ذهن من شکل گرفته.

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

16 Jun 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

❇️AUDUSD-H4 📎چارت خوبی داره در حال حاضر .... میتونه قبل از FO بره و PA بده و بیاد برای LSKINK دست نخورده ای که پایین جامونده . ✨Fear less . Risk more...

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

12 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

📌در مورد اون موضوع تفاوت پیوتی که سمت انگلف یا FO شکل میگیره و تفاوتشون این مثال لایو یورو رو ببینین که چون اون پیوت انگلف بوده بعدش که قیمت از PA اومده " از QM عبور کرده و پشت QM رو زده که به اصطلاح سکرت داده . و در این حالت میتونی انگلف بودن سقف رو تایید کنی.

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

12 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🔄😁مثل اینکه یکم عجله کردم برای تغییر نظرم در مورد انگلف نبودن اون سقف - هرچند تو لایو مارکت با توجه به این که بعدش اومده بود و QM کار کرده بود( دایره آبی رنک) تشخیصش سخت میشد و به همین دلیل شک کردم به کل ماجرا . ( خودم موفق شدم دستی وارد شم که یخورده ریسک به ریوارد رو بهم ریخت )

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

11 Jun 2026, 16:18 UTC822 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🔄درمورد سقف اون بالا که یخورده انگلف بودن یا نبودنش مورد تردید بود (که اگر یادتون باشه تو پست قبلی گفتم دوس دارم یه بار دیگه پشتش بخوره که با خیال راحت بشه انگلف دید)، در حال حاضر با توجه به شواهد و این که اومده بعدش Qm گرفته; میشه اینجوری برداشت کرد که یحتمل Fo بوده ناحیه اول تو تحلیل قبلی یه واکنش ۴۰ پیپی داشت ولی ناحیه پایینی دیگه خیلی های ریسک میشه ...

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

10 Jun 2026, 14:35 UTC727 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

📎اگر یخورده تو لایو مارکت بیشتر زوم کنیم و در تایم پایین تر حرکت رو برای یه ستاپ احتمالی بررسی کنیم چیزی که مشخصه اینه که قیمت قبل از رسیدن به جای درست قرمز رنگ یه نقدینگی $$$$ قشنگ تشکیل داده. و اگر باکس قرمز Dp سواپ درستی برای ناحیه باشه ( هرچند دوس دارم یه بار دیگه پشتش بخوره تا با خیال راحت تر بشه انگلف دید) میتونه نواحی پایین نواحی خوبی برای بای احتمالی مجدد باشه . همچنان صبر می کنم ...

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

10 Jun 2026, 14:22 UTC632 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

📎خب اگر برگردیم سراغ سناریو احتمالی اول که تشکیل یه ساختار تامن نقدینگی در اسکیل بزرگتر(کن کن) هستش و قیمت بخواد مسیر B<A رو طی کنه( با فرض درست بودن سناریو ) تا ساختار رو تکمیل کنه ؛ ۲تا مانع سر راهش هست . ۱. همین FL که با قرمز مشخص کردم و جای درستش که تو چارت مشخص شده . ۲. ادامه اردرفلو که رو چارت مشخصه (خاکستری ) که حالا اگر از ناحیه اول عبور کرد و بهش رسیدیم درموردش صحبت میکنیم‌‌‌ ...

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

10 Jun 2026, 12:06 UTC690 viewsread 12 September 2026

📎 در مورد GBP/USD، چون بیشتر روی پوند تمرکز دارم، این احتمال را می‌دهم که نواحی فروش بالاتر که منتظرشان هستم دیگر دیده نشوند و بازار با خبر CPI امروز وارد یک موج فروش قوی بشه. با این حال، همچنان اون محدوده‌ها رو در واچ‌لیست دارم. اگر قیمت به نواحی بالاتر برسه، اونجا برای موقعیت فروش دوباره تصمیم‌گیری می‌کنم. 🛑فعلاً صبر و رصد واکنش بازار بهترین گزینه است. ⏳

Signed Mohammad Vatankhah

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RTMchartist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دوره های آموزش زبان
@LearnLangs · 24,274
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
TSESTOCKS
@tsestocks · 26,174
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RTM chartist” (@RTMchartist), 1,250 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RTMchartist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.