東京大阪禁止安排的旅館❌‼️ https://t.me/RTGH66

Channel
東京大阪禁止安排的旅館❌‼️
@RTGH66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003827500485 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RTGH66 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RTGH66 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 97 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 88 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 84 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 84 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 83 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
🔔通知🔔通知🔔通知🔔 關於東京大阪的東橫NN酒店情況‼️ 永久封鎖不派送~ 永久封鎖不派送~ 永久封鎖不派送~ 原因是:這一間酒店出的狀況太多了 所以已被例入黑名單 凡是開在東橫NN酒店的大大,一定要出來開情侶旅館才可以享受到女生的服務喲 因為禁止派送的酒店都會把拉黑在名單裡面
東京大阪禁止安排的旅館❌‼️ pinned a photo
關於大阪不安排住家和民宿公寓還有假日房間以及什麼樣的飯店才提供安排~ 🚫不安排住家/住宿类型 比如: ❌日本民宿/Airbnb ❌假日租房/套房 ❌不提供上門住家 大概詳細旅館參考❌不安排的: 大阪南海輝盛庭國際公寓 ❌不安排 ✅可安排酒店/情侶旅館 比如:商務酒店/普通酒店/情侶旅館 大概詳細旅館參考✅可安排的: ホテルバリアンリゾートなんば心斎橋 ✅ 為什麼目前大阪的住家/公寓/假日房暫時先不提供安排服務? ①大阪本地妹妹很多情況下會碰到熟人(街坊、朋友)因此對於上門服務是拒絕🙅♀️ ②來自不一樣城市的日本女生也會在大阪報班兼職 她們對大阪更加不熟悉~ ③大阪區域內不同地理位置分散,交通路線複雜 ④大阪的隱私與安全風險需要控制 🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@txiaony 📱:jp1154 🌸:點擊加入總頻道 🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 #東京 #大阪 #外送茶 #現金日圓 #照片本人
#大阪 アクロカプセルホテルなんば道頓堀 住所: 〒542-0071 大阪府大阪市中央区道頓堀2丁目2-20 リッツビル 電話番号: +81 6-6210-5348 禁止派送原因: 沒前台
#大阪 ユニットホテルレジデンスなんば元町 所在地: エスペラル浪速 住所: 〒556-0016 大阪市浪速区元町2丁目13-8 電話番号: +81 70-1439-2361 禁止派送原因: 住家類酒店
#大阪 エスプレッソ ナンバパークストリート 住所: 〒556-0012 大阪市浪速区敷津東3丁目5番10号 電話番号: +81 6-6643-8801 禁止派送原因: 没有前台 自助式公寓酒店
#大阪 エスリードホテル難波道頓堀東 〒542-0066 大阪市中央区瓦屋町 2 丁目 18-10 • +81 80-3259-3409 禁止安排原因:公寓式酒店
#東京 Dキューブ 住所: 〒170-0002 東京都豊島市巣鴨1丁目38-5 電話番号: +81 3-3946-0015 禁止安排原因: 櫃檯不讓女生上去 禁止安排
#大阪 ‼️不安排的旅館‼️ 🏨 酒店名稱:エスリードホテル難波東 〒556-0005 大阪市浪速区日本橋 4 丁目 1-11 • +81 6-6626-9380 禁派原因:民宿不安排
#東京 品川東武ホテル 住所: 〒108-0074 東京都港区高輪4丁目7-6 電話番号: +81 3-3447-0111 禁止派送:櫃檯不上女生上去
#大阪 ‼️不安排的旅館‼️ 🏨 酒店名稱:遠東悅樂大阪難波南酒店 〒556-0012 大阪市浪速区敷津東1丁目6番21号 電話番号: +81 6-6633-1522 禁派原因:公寓不安排
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RTGH66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 215,492 of 1,599,580entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RTGH66 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“東京大阪禁止安排的旅館❌‼️” (@RTGH66), 97 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RTGH66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.