Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تحديثات تطبيق شام كاش

@RRXOR

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

70,359subscribers

-299 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725554685
TypeChannel
Username@RRXOR
Descriptionآخر تحديثات واخبار للتطبيق يتم تنزيلها بالقناة
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RRXOR

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RRXOR/768 · this entry2 May 2026, 21:31 UTC@wysytfg/1172 May 2026, 21:33 UTC1.002 minutes
@RRXOR/782 · this entry19 May 2026, 20:38 UTC@wysytfg/12819 May 2026, 20:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@RRXOR/805 · this entry8 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC@wysytfg/1468 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@wysytfg/1479 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC@RRXOR/806 · this entry9 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC1.0012 minutes
@wysytfg/14918 Jul 2026, 22:09 UTC@RRXOR/809 · this entry18 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC1.002 minutes
@wysytfg/1511 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC@RRXOR/817 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC1.0025 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@wysytfg7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@wysytfg (43)
@shamcashapp6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutes@shamcashapp (60)
@Shamcashpp15 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9827 hoursthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @shamcashapp. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

70,35970,65870,508.57 August 2026 — 70,658 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,643 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,581 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70,532 subscribers10 August 2026 — 70,485 subscribers11 August 2026 — 70,401 subscribers12 August 2026 — 70,359 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,314–70,703 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:3470,359-42
11 Aug 2026, 20:0270,401-84
10 Aug 2026, 17:1470,485-47
9 Aug 2026, 19:3270,532-49
8 Aug 2026, 20:1770,581-62
7 Aug 2026, 21:1070,643-15
7 Aug 2026, 17:4570,658first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 70,359 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,550
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.393%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total59,870
Reactions total235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,835 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,13161.6%
👍42823.3%
🥰925.01%
🔥814.41%
👏542.94%
251.36%
🤝140.763%
🫡100.545%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,835reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RRXOR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈2,230 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متوفر تفعيل تلجرام مميز بعلامة التوثيق 💎 3 شهور بـ 15 $ دولار امريكي 🟫 او 28 رصيد ❤️ 6 شهور بـ 20 $ دولار امريكي 🟫 او 37 رصيد ❤️ مدة سنة بـ 33 $ دولار امريكي🟫 او 60 رصيد ❤️ - للتفعيل تواصل ← @G_1_1 ✅

3

11 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈2,230 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متوفر ارقام تلجرام امريكية وهمية ✅ - سعر الرقم بــ 2 $ ✈️ - سعر رقمين بـ 3 $ ✈️ - 4 ارقام بــ←5 $ ✈️ طرق الدفع المتوفرة: { شام كاش سوريا ، رصيد آسيا للعراق ، فودافون كاش لمصر ، محفظة جيب لليمن ، محفظة باينس USDT لجميع الدول }‌‌ للشراء تواصل ← @G_1_1 ❤️ دليل التسليم ← @whatsapp_dlel ✅

11 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈2,190 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متوفر ارقام واتساب وهمية 💙 ⤵️ سعر الرقم لكل دولة ⤵️ سعر الرقم لسوريا 2 $ او 270 ليرة سوري شام كاش سعر الرقم للعراق 3000 رصيد آسيا كـرت او تحويـل سعر الرقم للـيمـن 1060 ريــال يـمنـي مـحفظـة جيب سعر الرقم لـمصـر 85 جـنـية محفظة فودافون كـاش أيضاً متوفر محفظة باينس 2USDT للرقم 🛒🤑 #تنويه؛ لاتوجد كفالة للرقم ابدا . - للشراء تواصل ← @G_1_1 💎 - دليل التسليم ← @whatsapp_dlel ✅

2

2 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC≈9,640 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#مؤقت السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، عملاء شام كاش الكرام، بفضل الله، تمت إعادة تفعيل جميع خدمات الدفع، وعادت للعمل بشكل طبيعي. نشكر لكم صبركم وتفهمكم، ونعتذر عن أي إزعاج تسبب به هذا التوقف المؤقت.

43👍4

1 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC≈9,980 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#مؤقت السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، عملاء شام كاش الكرام، نعتذر عن توقف بعض خدمات الدفع عن طريق شام كاش بسبب وجود مشكلة في الربط الشبكي مع مزودي هذه الخدمات. يعمل فريقنا على معالجة المشكلة وإعادة خدمات الدفع المتوقفة إلى العمل في أسرع وقت ممكن بإذن الله. سوف نقوم بإعلامكم فور إعادة تفعيل الخدمات وعودتها للعمل. نشكر لكم تفهمكم وتعاونكم، ونعتذر عن أي إزعاج قد يترتب على ذلك.

24👍13

19 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC≈16,700 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#مؤقت السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، عملاء شام كاش الكرام، تم وصل الكابلات الضوئية، وعادت خدمات شام كاش للعمل بشكل طبيعي. شكرًا لتفهمكم، ونعتذر عن أي إزعاج.

41👍32

18 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC≈16,900 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#مؤقت السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، عملاء شام كاش الكرام، نعتذر عن توقف بعض خدمات شام كاش بشكل مؤقت، وذلك نتيجة مشكلة في الشبكة. يعمل فريقنا حالياً على معالجة المشكلة واستعادة جميع الخدمات في أسرع وقت ممكن. نشكر لكم تفهمكم وتعاونكم، ونعتذر عن أي إزعاج قد يترتب على ذلك.

👍3719👏6🫡65

9 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC≈23,400 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عملاء شام كاش الأعزاء يرجى منكم تعديل واستكمال بيانات حسابكم في شام كاش، بحيث تكون مطابقة تماماً للبيانات الواردة في البطاقة الشخصية أو إخراج القيد، ويمكنكم تنفيذ هذه الخطوة بسهولة من داخل التطبيق. ونذكّركم بأن استكمال بيانات الحساب ومطابقتها للبيانات الرسمية يُعد خطوة لازمة لضمان استمرار استخدام حسابكم بصورة طبيعية ومنتظمة. ولأي مساعدة أو إرشاد، يمكنكم التواصل مع فريق خدمة الزبائن عبر القنوات الرسمية لشام كاش.

👍2014👏5🤝2🥰2

8 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC≈21,600 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عملاء شام كاش الأعزاء نود تذكيركم بالتعامل بحذر مع أي عروض أو رسائل غير رسمية تطلب تحويل مبالغ مالية أو مشاركة بيانات الحساب، سواء كانت تحت عنوان قرض أو فرصة استثمار أو أرباح عبر الإنترنت أو مجموعات تسويق أو ادعاء تمثيل شام كاش لتوثيق الحساب أو تفعليه أو ترقيته. وتعتمد شام كاش في تواصلها معكم على قنواتها الرسمية فقط، ولا تطلب منكم مشاركة رمز التحقق OTP أو بيانات الحساب مع أي شخص. في حال تعرضتم لأي محاولة نصب أو احت

21👍15👏2

7 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC≈19,400 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متوفر ارقام تلجرام امريكية وهمية ✅ - سعر الرقم بــ 2 $ ✈️ - سعر رقمين بـ 3 $ ✈️ - 4 ارقام بــ←5 $ ✈️ طرق الدفع المتوفرة: { شام كاش سوريا ، رصيد آسيا للعراق ، فودافون كاش لمصر ، محفظة جيب لليمن ، محفظة باينس USDT لجميع الدول }‌‌ للشراء تواصل ← @G_1_1 ❤️ دليل التسليم ← @whatsapp_dlel ✅

12

7 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC≈20,000 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متوفر ارقام واتساب وهمية 💙 ⤵️ سعر الرقم لكل دولة ⤵️ سعر الرقم لسوريا 2 $ او 270 ليرة سوري شام كاش سعر الرقم للعراق 3000 رصيد آسيا كـرت او تحويـل سعر الرقم للـيمـن 1060 ريــال يـمنـي مـحفظـة جيب سعر الرقم لـمصـر 85 جـنـية محفظة فودافون كـاش أيضاً متوفر محفظة باينس 2USDT للرقم 🛒🤑 #تنويه؛ لاتوجد كفالة للرقم ابدا . - للشراء تواصل ← @G_1_1 💎 - دليل التسليم ← @whatsapp_dlel ✅

17

2 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC≈26,500 views109 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

53👍32👏119🔥2🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RRXOR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 152,451 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تحديثات تطبيق شام كاش” (@RRXOR), 70,359 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RRXOR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.