4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,631–3,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:28
3,632
-1
9 Aug 2026, 18:42
3,633
+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:33
3,631
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:15
3,631
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 3,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
463
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
13 (3 June 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
925
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
120 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
29
24.2%
👍
24
20.0%
❤
18
15.0%
✍
11
9.17%
🏆
8
6.67%
👌
8
6.67%
💯
5
4.17%
🤔
4
3.33%
🤝
4
3.33%
👏
3
2.50%
😁
3
2.50%
🤯
3
2.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ROSINFRA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
22 июля 2024 года Президент России Владимир Путин подписал закон о ГЧП в сфере космической деятельности
Государственно-частное партнёрство (ГЧП) помогает разделить финансовую нагрузку, возникающую при создании объектов и инфраструктуры для отрасли, между частными инвесторами и государством, а также ускорить реализацию масштабных проектов.
Для реализации закона Роскосмос и ВЭБ.РФ запустили проектный офис по ГЧП и фо…
ВЭБ получил статус спецорганизации по сопровождению инвестпроектов 2️⃣
Сегодня Госдума приняла соответствующие поправки в законы об инвестдеятельности и о ВЭБ.РФ. Законопроект внес Минэк.
➡️ Что даёт новый статус:
• ВЭБ будет оказывать информационно-консультационную поддержку инвесторам;
• помогать регионам формировать инвестиционные предложения;
• участвовать в разработке инвестдеклараций в рамках регионального и…
❤️ Какие анонсы в сфере ГЧП стали ключевыми в мае-июне?
🎙️Специально для Росинфра эксперты практики ГЧП и проектного финансирования CLS подготовили обзор самых важных событий этой сферы - ключевых судебных споров и изменений законодательства.
Главное в этом выпуске дайджеста:
➡️несогласование ОУФ и рост ключевой ставки: пределы защиты концессионера при досрочном прекращении соглашения
➡️неосновательное обогащение к…
🔴🔴🔴 Банки готовятся существенно нарастить кредитование проектов государственно-частного партнерства (ГЧП). Для этого регулятор изменит правила расчета банковских резервов, сообщили «Эксперту» в ЦБ.
Суть изменений
Сейчас риски ГЧП-проектов оцениваются очень высоко, хотя концедент (государство или регион) обязуется компенсировать банку неисполнение обязательств инвестором.
ЦБ планирует снизить риск-веса (показатель,…
Новые правила на рынке данных дистанционного зондирования Земли
Госкорпорация «Роскосмос» и Правительство РФ утвердили порядок получения данных ДЗЗ и методику определения стоимости базовой расчетной единицы.
График космической съёмки формируется ежегодно не позднее 1 декабря
Теперь госорганизации обязаны направлять заявки на покупку снимков в Роскосмос. Госкорпорация проверяет наличие данных в федеральном фонде, ес…
⭐️ Стартовал прием заявок на реализацию проектов ГЧП в рамках федпроекта «Бизнес-спринт (Я выбираю спорт)»
🟢Минспорт России объявил отбор проектов для получения субсидий из федерального бюджета на создание и реконструкцию объектов спортивной инфраструктуры массового спорта.
📅 Сроки: с 6 по 10 июля 2026 года включительно.
🟢Реализация проектов должна осуществляться на основании соглашений о ГЧП (МЧП) и концессионных…
💡Утвержден ГОСТ по государственно-частному взаимодействию
Росстандарт утвердил первый нацстандарт «Государственно-частное взаимодействие. Общие положения». Он вступит в силу 1 сентября. Его разработкой по поручению президента России занимался ВЭБ.РФ.
➡️Принятие документа станет основой для дальнейшего формирования системы национальных стандартов в сфере ГЧВ и развития практики их применения в регионах.
💫Совет Федерации предлагает расширить механизмы поддержки проектов ГЧП в ракетно-космической отрасли
В постановлении Совета Федерации от 17 июня 2026 года №257-СФ ВЭБу и Роскосмосу рекомендовано представить в Правительство РФ предложения по расширению применения механизмов поддержки ГЧП в космической отрасли.
🔥Речь идет в том числе об использовании инструментов группы ВЭБ.РФ, а также механизмов коллективного и прое…
Глава Роскосмоса Дмитрий Баканов считает, что важной задачей госкорпорации на сегодняшний день стало максимальное вовлечение в ракетно-космическую отрасль частных компаний.
«Сейчас Роскосмос как институт – регулятор отрасли. При этом одна часть компаний входят в нашу корпорацию, а другая – находится за ее периметром, – отметил он в интервью «Эксперту». – Зачастую Роскосмос, поддерживая свои компании, боролся с теми …
Павел Селезнев: Smart money — новая философия частных инвестиций в космос 💼
Об этом старший управляющий партнер ВЭБа по ГЧП рассказал на сессии ПМЭФ'26 "Экономика космоса: как привлечь частный капитал в космическую отрасль"
➡️ Главное:
🔘 Задача не заработать на космосе, а обеспечить технологический суверенитет. На 1 бюджетный рубль — минимум 2 внебюджетных.
Когда инвестор сам готовит финансовую модель и бережливо…
‼️ Где лучше вести бизнес в России: результаты инвестрейтинга — 2026
Представляем топ-20 регионов:
1. Москва и Республика Татарстан
2. Нижегородская и Московская области
3. Сахалинская область, Санкт-Петербург, Республика Башкортостан
4. Калужская область и Краснодарский край
5. Республика Крым и Чеченская Республика
6. Новгородская область
7. Липецкая область, ХМАО — Югра, Тюменская и Магаданская области
8. Смолен…
❤️ Проектный офис Роскосмоса и ВЭБа запускает инвестплатформу «КосмоТехника» для поддержки проектов ГЧП в космосе
➡️Ее основными партнерами станут Фонд суверенных технологий НТИ, Фонд «Восход» и Фонд «Сколково» (Группа ВЭБ). Соглашение подписано на ПМЭФ в присутствии председателя ВЭБа Игоря Шувалова и генерального директора Роскосмос Дмитрия Баканова.
➡️«КосмоТехника» станет инвестиционным «фильтром» для отбора про…
🔥6❤5🏆5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ROSINFRA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 227,832 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Росинфра” (@ROSINFRA), 3,632 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ROSINFRA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
