Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НАЦДЕМ

@RNDem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,770subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603527886
TypeChannel
Username@RNDem
Created17 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RNDem

Growth

6,7706,7956,782.56 August 2026 — 6,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,795 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,783 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,766–6,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:346,770-13
9 Aug 2026, 22:116,783-12
6 Aug 2026, 10:216,795no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:576,795first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 17s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,973 reactions across 18 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮2,90026.4%
🤣1,73015.8%
🤡1,46613.4%
💊1,19010.8%
🤯6656.06%
😁3593.27%
😡3543.23%
🥰3443.13%
💯3112.83%
🤬2782.53%
🍌2252.05%
👍2101.91%
👏1891.72%
1451.32%
🫡910.829%
💩810.738%
😎730.665%
🖕670.611%
😭570.519%
🕊350.319%
23 further kinds2031.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,973reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2024 to 14 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2024, 12:03 UTC≈106,000 views1,668 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Бабки из "Отряды Путина" сожгли чучело Байдена в честь Масленицы. Чучело против Чучело

💊955🤣324🤡99🫡84👍65😭57🕊3517

14 Mar 2024, 11:47 UTC≈99,000 views1,676 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сотни тысяч таких "авторитетных таджиков" уже получили российские паспорта 😊

🤮1,260🤬191🤡87💩52👍24🤪19😁17🥰11

14 Mar 2024, 11:26 UTC≈79,600 views789 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ВЫ ЧУВСТВУЕТЕ СКРЕПЫ???

🤯445💊165🤡75🤣51🤬15💩12👍7🫡6

14 Mar 2024, 10:41 UTC≈71,500 views855 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Гвардия "Молодая Гойда". Ну или сборище гоев.

🤮610🤣124🤡47👍21💊1311💩10🖕7

14 Mar 2024, 10:20 UTC≈50,900 views767 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Госдуме призвали россиян не бояться возвращающихся с войны заключённых По словам председателя Комитета по обороне Андрея Картаполова, с фронта бывшие заключённые возвращаются «другими людьми», поскольку «одно дело десять лет баланду хлебать, а другое — каждый день в атаку ходить».

🤡632🤬40😁33💊19🤓16👍126🐳4

14 Mar 2024, 10:07 UTC≈47,000 views366 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новая незаконная агитация с вовлечением несовершеннолетних. На странице молодежного клуба «Метеор» из Питера размещена публикация, в которой предлагается «пообсуждать значение выборов». Спикер пришел на встречу о выборах в мерче «Команды Путина». Ну да.. классика.

🤮296🤡42👍12🤬9🤣2😡21❤‍🔥1

14 Mar 2024, 09:43 UTC≈39,400 views361 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ЦИК РФ в лице Эллы Памфиловой обвинил движение "Голос" в подготовке провокаций во время выборов президента России 😂

🤡325🤣26🏆6👍21🍾1

14 Mar 2024, 09:13 UTC≈39,200 views435 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Путин попросил россиян прийти на президентские выборы. Выборы 15 17 марта.

🥰263🤣88🖕44👍11👎11😡76🙏2

14 Mar 2024, 08:32 UTC≈37,100 views431 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Реальность "путинской эрэфии"

🤣314🤮52😡38🤡7👍5💔5🦄5😈2

14 Mar 2024, 07:13 UTC≈32,200 views509 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Путин - это лидер, которому африканцы доверяют! Настоящий канон руzzкого мира✊

😡277🤣119🤮69🤬19👍12🏆4🥰42

14 Mar 2024, 06:46 UTC≈30,200 views555 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Депутат Госдумы Олег Нилов обвинил мужчин в том, что, покупая цветы на 8 марта, они финансируют поставки снарядов ВСУ. «Шесть миллиардов долларов денег наших мужчин ушли в Голландию. Куда Голландия направляет эти деньги? На снаряды ВСУ», — сказал шизойд. В ДУРКЕ СТАБИЛЬНО! 😂

💯310🤣167🤡46💊17🔥43🍌3👍3

14 Mar 2024, 04:40 UTC≈30,100 views596 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Это "международный эксперт по выборам" из Камеруна Натали Така. Она в восторге от организации "выборов" в России. В самом Камеруне с выборами всё хорошо, что там уже 42 года "выбирают" одного и того же "президента".

🤣429🥰63🤮53🍌17👍10🤡8🙊65

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RNDem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 486,696 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАЦДЕМ” (@RNDem), 6,770 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RNDem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.