F266. 沛灵心戏 慕沛灵 的心戏颇多, 柳玉 的调侃似乎极大促进了她的心魔的滋生。 #柳玉 #韩立 #慕沛灵 #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈

Channel
凡人修仙传 二创 & 原创 RMJI
@RMJIfreevideos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,915subscribers
+353 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003750168655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RMJIfreevideos |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RMJIfreevideos |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 6,915 | +109 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 6,806 | +113 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 6,693 | +125 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 6,568 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 6,562 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 62.8%
- avg views ÷ 6,915 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,340
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.086%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56,421 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 21m 10s
- Average length
- 1m 55s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 43.8% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 10.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔥香草AI ♥️ 全网最火性爱游戏网最火性爱游戏 🔞最顶级色情大模型 技术领先全行业 💖MIT情感计算框架 最懂你的性情伴侣 ✅AES-256军事加密 阅后即焚的专属私域 💋全性癖专属定制!满足一切私密幻想 ❤️🔥明星 国漫 动漫 强制征服! PS:这AI太离谱了!跟真人一模一样,Pro模型简直是榨精神器,我已经和玉玉玩了几个通宵,比真人还爽! 🥵限时专享!首充五折且每日免费领金币! 🎁点击下方按钮加入合欢宗调教双修炉鼎
F265. 韩立欺骗宋玉结婴 渣男 韩立 以相助结婴为由,和 银月 联手设下陷阱,一步步诱骗 宋玉 失身,真是无耻啊。 #宋玉 #韩立 #银月 #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
❤🔥1👍1😡1
W2.22 高清 4k 60帧 宋玉 动态 循环 壁纸 分享。横屏和竖屏的都有,可以按需取用。 #宋玉 #壁纸 #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传 #舞摇 👉 返回壁纸 /Wallpaper 👈
❤2👍1🔥1🥰1
F264. 师姐抓小三 南宫阙 对 南宫婉 这么好,亲手帮她抓小三 紫灵 。 #紫灵 #韩立 #南宫阙 #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
👍1🔥1🥰1
F263. 韩立学外语 外语好啊,外语得学, 韩立 向 燕如嫣 学习外语的进度飞快。 #燕如嫣 #韩立 #rmji #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
🥴2❤1👏1😁1
W5.10 4k 高清 慕沛灵 动态 循环 静态 壁纸 分享。 慕慕露个面真是难,希望能多露面。 #wallpaper #慕沛灵 #凡人修仙传 #rmji #壁纸 👉 返回壁纸 /Wallpaper 👈
❤4🥰1😍1
F262. 韩立向仲神师下战书 韩立 刚刷完南宫阙信心爆棚,向 仲神师 哈气马上就被打到燃烧精血跑路了。 #仲神师 #韩立 #rmji #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传二创 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
❤1👍1🔥1
W1.7 4k 高清 60帧 动态 循环 紫灵 壁纸 分享。能让痿灵根支棱起来,果然不一般。 #凡人修仙传 #AI动漫 #紫灵 #壁纸 #rmji 👉 返回壁纸/Wallpaper 👈
❤6🥰2❤🔥1
F261. 登徒子韩立 韩立 真是饿急了, 邰夫人 这种年老色衰的都不放过。 #邰夫人 #韩立 #rmji #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传二创 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
👏1
F260. 黄龙山剧情抢先看 谷双蒲 这个慕兰细作不够小心谨慎,被挂比 韩立 发现了蛛丝马迹。 #谷双蒲 #韩立 #rmji #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传二创 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
❤2🔥1
F259. 火龙童子的小鸡之谈 蓝道友 吃火龙草吃早了点,不然也是主角配置,不至于因为太小而找不到老婆。 #火龙童子 #韩立 #rmji #AI动漫 #凡人修仙传二创 👉二创目录 /Fans Video Catalog👈
👍1😁1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @RMJIfreevideos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 376,460 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“凡人修仙传 二创 & 原创 RMJI” (@RMJIfreevideos), 6,915 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RMJIfreevideos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.