Channel
@RG898
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,235subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003011822366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RG898 |
| Description | 吃瓜频道 有会员的亲朋好友们帮助推一下，万分感谢！免费投稿爆料： 广告合作 @WG868 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RG898 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 5,235 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 5,238 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 5,241 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 5,241 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,506 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#小姐姐投稿想提醒各位网友们网上的那些社交平台上发的美女帅哥都不一定是本人 大多是盗图去发，因为本人就是个例，照片被盗图在tiktok上去发，骗钱骗感情，然后有人就来找到了我，所以只能奉劝各位自己要小心一点，别到时候被骗了又去找上本人，给别人添麻烦，一般主动来私信你的美女或者帅哥私下都可能是猪头肉，不要觉得自己魅力大，人家是奔着目的去的。 千万别轻信网络上突如其来的好感，多留一份心眼，守住钱财，保护好自己。
#网友反馈 金三角特区山水酒店这边已经开始检查了，应该是有人打野被举报后引来的。 就在大约一个小时前，金水湾二期也有办公的人被举报，随后治安局直接上门，把打野的人带走了。最近特区里面和外面查得都比较严。
#网友投稿 接军区司令部通知 我单位于今日8月11日向三佛塔全面进攻 希望在三佛塔附近的园区里面的兄弟们早点撤离吧
❤1
Posted without readable text
#网友投稿 家人们，注意了注意了，这个人办假身份证，此人是景颇族，年龄36左右，帮人家办假身份证 一直说可以保真 去用身份证如果是假的 也不可以退钱后面我办得了好久没有时间去用，亲戚朋友就想办就推荐他们办，身份证还不到呢就不回复信息了，钱被骗了1000多万好多亲戚朋友跟她办，钱给完了，结果就这样拉黑了我就说了一句身份证是假的，退回来我们的钱她就不乐意了，我有你姑娘呢照片，你儿子呢微信，如果你们一家人不来处理 那我们会拿你姑娘呢照片给木姐警察你姑娘也在木姐呢 他们也在找你，你办假身份证，你家地址在哪里我们也晓得呢，这件事情你们自己处理，今天不处理我们直接去找你
#网友投稿 #在佤邦勐波的姐妹们注意了谈恋爱一定要擦亮眼睛，真心奉劝所有女生擦亮眼睛，看清这种毫无担当的下头男。 当初满心欢喜和你在一起，意外怀孕后我慌到不行，满心指望两个人一起面对。 可你倒好，各种谎话搪塞，找无数借口逃避责任，在我孕期直接提分手，狠心抽身。 怀孕三个月独自进医院做手术、住院休养，全程我一个人扛，医药费、住院费你一分不肯出。 发消息永远已读不回，装消失、冷暴力，半点心疼和愧疚都没有。 做错事的是你，受罪买单的却是我。没有责任心、只会逃避欺骗的人，永远不值得交付真心。 只愿所有女孩子都别再遇见这种不负责任的人，好好爱自己。
#网友爆料：缅东妙瓦底“UK999园区”里面都是贩卖人口，骗招的受害者！刚开始我在国内叫人的时候，说的是去泰国，等人到了之后就强行押到缅甸妙瓦底，园区地点就在这里，名字叫UK999。 这个园区不管中国男女，18岁到30岁的人都要，主要就是买卖 收人口，人到了之后就直接被绑架，再叫家里人打钱，家里没钱的打的半死！ 里面现在有上千个人回不去，现在妙瓦底最黑的就是这个园区，有些出来旅游后突然找不到的人，都在这里。
#网友曝光 特大诈骗集团 #红色通缉犯 #妙瓦底普鲁园区 新兴国际 #新禄丰 #金闪闪 #李一 来自安徽宿州的逃犯【张伟（代号张君）】伙同其亲哥【张明】开设新兴国际、新禄丰、金闪闪等特大诈骗园区，主营美国群洗、精聊、国内军包，并投资建设多处诈骗园区。 早几年投资建设昔日的妙瓦底KK园区二期东风园区，并开设新兴国际诈骗集团，累计几百个美金小目标业绩。 指派李一、李明、跛豪等一众马仔代理前往普鲁地区开设人事部从事网络骗招、买卖人口。 KK遭遇打击解体后又前往普鲁地区投资建设普鲁园区，新兴国际搬家至普鲁后改名新禄丰，大量骗招、买入员工，经营期间把员工逼到上吊死在宿舍。 多名管理层殴打员工致死。 园区稳定后派其头号小弟李一【真名 #于跃 曾在国内红极一时的 #致雅集团董事长 涉案资金上亿的通缉犯 红通】任命为园区负责人，人称“一哥”。 同时开设金闪闪诈骗公司，从事国内军包盘，时常打死员工，闹出人命，想逃离魔窟需支付50-…
#群友投稿：给昨天特区万国大检查，不是为了抓推推。 主要原因是楼里有一个老挝妹抽烟抽死在床上了，现在人已经由治安局带到殡仪馆，奉劝各位推推，在东南亚赚赚钱就行了，du这个东西还是不要碰，年纪轻轻划不来，可惜了这么位妙龄女子！！！ PS：脚踏东南亚，黄赌DU一沾，前途尽毁，悔恨终生
#网友爆料 自己来找我道歉狗东西，劳资发劳资的作品和你有什么关系我草你全家，不来道歉你们老大哪里我自己过去说小逼娃娃
#网友曝光 #熙运团队 在幸福公寓 旁边，大主管名字叫 #林飞，养了个小三名字叫 #玫瑰 做行政，两公婆坑死人。 7月31号离职被扣保护费5000加12000，做了一个月离职发到手的工资就一万多泰铢，太坑人了。 草你妈的傻逼林飞，我干你妈，兄弟们这个公司千万千万不要去，去了就后悔来不及了，不要去。 现在在工作的兄弟姐妹都想跑了，就因为要扣这个扣那个、什么逼粉，自己心里没有点逼数吗？草你妈，就会坑人，我草你妈。 来到缅甸你他妈还装逼，不要给我在外面看见你，老子看见就把你抗掉，我草你妈坑逼屎公司。 还有一个组长拍马屁 #小寒，人跟个几把毛一样丑，他妈逼的还那么自信，什么几把也不会，什么几把都来管。 请问大哥你那么牛逼，为什么你在的9线会倒闭，就因为有你们这种傻逼玩意儿存在了知道吗？ 来到幸福公寓就开始拍马屁、装疯卖傻，你们熙运团队也不长久了，很快就倒闭了，就因为有你们这种拍马屁的傻逼。 小寒四眼仔，我草你妈，有种你…
#网友投稿 亚太四号地，启盛公司开发的安全感，请你自重，不要来骚扰我乱叫我了。 你知道我有男朋友了还一直来骚扰我叫我做你女朋友？我之前也跟你说过几次了，我把你当朋友你既然想破坏我的感情？ 请你不要再给我发信息了，我男朋友能看到聊天记录，因为你给我发信息乱叫我导致我男朋友跟我吵了几次架了。
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @RG898. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 142,358 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 90 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“特区吃瓜| 吃瓜曝光|全网吃瓜|缅甸曝光|全网曝光|勐拉吃瓜|缅甸曝光” (@RG898), 5,235 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RG898.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.