Channel
@REPUBLICPRESS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,855subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001457650346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @REPUBLICPRESS |
| Created | 21 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/REPUBLICPRESS |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 2,855 | -8 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 2,863 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 2,865 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 2,870 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 2,879 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 2,887 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 2,890 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 2,897 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 2,901 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 2,902 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 2,907 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 2,905 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 2,909 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 2,915 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 2,915 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
23 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 34.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Azerbaijan Violated Human Rights Convention Over Beheading and Mutilation of Armenian Soldier: ECHR Driving the news: The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled that Azerbaijan violated the right to life and the prohibition of torture in the case of an Armenian serviceman Hayk Toroyan, who was killed during the April 2016 Azerbaijani agression against Artsakh. The court found violations of Article 2 of th…
😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
Armenia's Court Revokes Artsakh’s Ownership of Its Yerevan Representation Building Driving the news: Armenia’s Administrative Court has invalidated the Republic of Artsakh’s ownership registration for its representative office building in Yerevan, granting a lawsuit filed by the Prosecutor General’s Office. The Prosecutor General’s Office sought to annul the state registration recognizing the property as belonging…
👍1
Held in Azerbaijani Prison, Former Artsakh Speaker Calls Trial a Sham Driving the news: Former Artsakh National Assembly Speaker Davit Ishkhanyan, who is being held in a prison in Baku, has issued an audio message addressing the appeal proceedings in his case. The recording was published on the National Assembly of Artsakh’s Facebook page. Ishkhanyan said the proceedings before Azerbaijan’s Court of Appeal are “fo…
Photo, posted without a caption
Israel Moves to Recognize Armenian Genocide Amid Gaza War Tensions; Knesset Approval Still Required Driving the news: Israel’s Cabinet unanimously approved a proposal to formally recognize the Armenian Genocide committed by the Ottoman Empire during World War I. The decision, introduced by Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, must still be approved by the Knesset, Israel’s parliament. Why it matters: The move comes ami…
❤4😁1😈1
Armenia’s Central Election Commission Completes Vote Count Driving the news: The Central Election Commission of Armenia has completed the counting of votes from the country’s parliamentary election. A total of 2,503,976 citizens were eligible to vote. According to the commission, 1.458.677 voters participated, resulting in a turnout of 58.97%. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s ruling Civil Contract party received …
🤬3👍2🎉1
Preliminary results from 1596 polling stations out of total 2005 show: • [Civil Contract/Pashinyan] — [49.56]% • [Strong Armenia/Karapetyan] — [23.50]% • [Prosperous Armenia/Tsarukyan] — [3.79]% • [Armenia Alliance/Kocharyan] — [10.08]% The figures remain preliminary. The results are based on 1.101.355 ballots counted out of 1,476,597 votes cast as of 8:00 p.m @REPUBLICPRESS
🔥1
Preliminary results from 1159 polling stations out of total 2005 show: • [Civil Contract/Pashinyan] — [50.88]% • [Strong Armenia/Karapetyan] — [23.23]% • [Prosperous Armenia/Tsarukyan] — [4.16]% • [Armenia Alliance/Kocharyan] — [9.60]% The figures remain preliminary. The results are based on 701.848 ballots counted out of 1,476,597 votes cast as of 8:00 p.m @REPUBLICPRESS
Preliminary results from 1029 polling stations out of total 2005 show: • [Civil Contract/Pashinyan] — [51.71]% • [Strong Armenia/Karapetyan] — [23.20]% • [Prosperous Armenia/Tsarukyan] — [4.29]% • [Armenia Alliance/Kocharyan] — [9.33]% • [Wings of Unity/Tatoyan] — [2.29]% The figures remain preliminary. The results are based on 587.194 ballots counted out of 1,476,597 votes cast as of 8:00 p.m @REPUBLICPRESS
Preliminary results from 787 polling stations out of total 2005 show: • [Civil Contract/Pashinyan] — [51.20]% • [Strong Armenia/Karapetyan] — [23.41]% • [Prosperous Armenia/Tsarukyan] — [3.86]% • [Armenia Alliance/Kocharyan] — [9.73]% • [Wings of Unity/Tatoyan] — [2.30]% The figures remain preliminary. The results are based on 404.818 ballots counted out of 1,476,597 votes cast as of 8:00 p.m @REPUBLICPRESS
Preliminary results from 612 polling stations out of total 2005 show: • [Civil Contract/Pashinyan] — [51.06]% • [Strong Armenia/Karapetyan] — [23.13]% • [Prosperous Armenia/Tsarukyan] — [4.10]% • [Armenia Alliance/Kocharyan] — [9.80]% • [Wings of Unity/Tatoyan] — [2.19]% The figures remain preliminary. The results are based on 306.421 ballots counted out of 1,476,597 votes cast as of 8:00 p.m @REPUBLICPRESS
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @REPUBLICPRESS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RE:PUBLIC PRESS” (@REPUBLICPRESS), 2,855 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/REPUBLICPRESS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.