Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for серия токенов 👑 ЦАРЬ

Channel

серия токенов 👑 ЦАРЬ

@RA_BAAL

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

20,364subscribers

+20,087 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036331489
TypeChannel
Username@RA_BAAL
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/RA_BAAL

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

27722,71511,4967 August 2026 — 277 subscribers8 August 2026 — 277 subscribers8 August 2026 — 280 subscribers15 August 2026 — 289 subscribers22 August 2026 — 309 subscribers28 August 2026 — 327 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,025 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,777 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,352 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,694 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,017 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,987 subscribers2 October 2026 — 22,715 subscribers7 October 2026 — 22,287 subscribers11 October 2026 — 21,551 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,460 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,422 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,368 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,296 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,220 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,075 subscribers20 October 2026 — 20,648 subscribers21 October 2026 — 20,589 subscribers22 October 2026 — 20,528 subscribers23 October 2026 — 20,484 subscribers24 October 2026 — 20,443 subscribers26 October 2026 — 20,426 subscribers26 October 2026 — 20,388 subscribers27 October 2026 — 20,364 subscribers20,3647 August 202627 October 2026
29 measurements spanning 81 days, net +20,087. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 20:1920,364-24
26 Oct 2026, 21:5620,388-38
26 Oct 2026, 00:1720,426-17
24 Oct 2026, 20:4620,443-41
23 Oct 2026, 21:4520,484-44
22 Oct 2026, 23:0620,528-61
21 Oct 2026, 18:5120,589-59
20 Oct 2026, 11:1820,648-427
19 Oct 2026, 12:3821,075-145
18 Oct 2026, 15:3521,220-76
17 Oct 2026, 12:2021,296-72
16 Oct 2026, 08:4721,368-54
15 Oct 2026, 05:5921,422-38
14 Oct 2026, 04:1121,460-91
11 Oct 2026, 22:2121,551-736
7 Oct 2026, 10:1522,287-428
2 Oct 2026, 13:3822,715+2,728
18 Sept 2026, 13:2119,987-30
16 Sept 2026, 02:4220,017+323
14 Sept 2026, 08:1819,694first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.14%
avg views ÷ 20,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
231
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held60 (3 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total6,244
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 11:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 37 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6432.0%
🔥4723.5%
❤4020.0%
🖕126.00%
🎉105.00%
👏63.00%
👎52.50%
🏆42.00%
👌42.00%
😁31.50%
⚡21.00%
🤩10.5%
🥰10.5%
🥴10.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 53 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RA_BAAL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 07:54 UTC125 views6 reactionsread 12 October 2026

🔥iCrypto-чек на 625000000 👑 ЦАРЬ Внутри чека: 5000 активация(й) по 100000 👑 ЦАРЬ с реферальной наградой 25000 👑 ЦАРЬ .

👎5❤1

11 Oct 2026, 16:07 UTC153 viewsread 12 October 2026
Photo

💬 Эй, криптоэнтузиаст! Какие события в мире криптовалют тебя удивили в последнее время? 🌍💹 Мне кажется, что происходят настоящие изменения - кто-то взлетает, кто-то падает, а кто-то просто исчезает с радаров! Например, ты заметил, как некоторые проекты перестают быть актуальными? Это заставляет нас задуматься: стоит ли инвестировать в них или лучше искать что-то новое? 🤔 Давай обсудим последние новости! Какие тенден…

10 Oct 2026, 20:54 UTC149 viewsread 12 October 2026

https://tsar-rub-lt87ahb9.agent.mira.tg Как это было - тогда... В будущем - помнишь?

10 Oct 2026, 16:08 UTC138 viewsread 12 October 2026
Photo

💬 Задумывался ли ты, как криптовалюты меняют глобальные экономические тренды? 🌍💸 В последние годы мы стали свидетелями того, как биткойн и другие альткойны не только привлекли внимание инвесторов, но и заставили целые страны пересмотреть свои финансовые системы. Криптоинвестирование становится более доступным, и люди ищут новые решения для своих сбережений. Это вызывает изменения в политике центробанков, а некоторые…

9 Oct 2026, 21:12 UTC117 views7 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥5⚡1👌1

9 Oct 2026, 21:08 UTC107 views11 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

👑 ЦАРЬ на белом коне — 10 сек, эпик-трейлер

🔥7👏3⚡1

9 Oct 2026, 16:08 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

💬 Эй, криптосообщество! Давайте поговорим о том, что сейчас на слуху в мире криптовалют. 📈💸 Недавние колебания на рынке вызваны не только новыми инвестициями, но и изменениями в регуляциях. 🏛️ Что думаешь об этом? Также не забудем о прогнозах от лидеров индустрии - о том, что может произойти в ближайшие месяцы. 🤔 Изменения правил игры и новые технологии - это наш новый реальный мир. Кто уже успел разобраться с похожи…

👍3

8 Oct 2026, 16:07 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 12 October 2026

💬 Привет, криптосообщество! Давайте обсудим, что происходит в мире криптовалют в данный момент? 🌍✨ Я чувствую, что многие темы сейчас как никогда важны: новые законы, перепады цен и запуск новых проектов. Как на все это смотришь? Есть ли у тебя свои наблюдения или мнения? 🤔 Давайте делиться мнениями и обсуждать, что нас ждет впереди. 💭👇 📢 Сделано в Inside

❤3👌1🔥1

7 Oct 2026, 16:08 UTC200 viewsread 12 October 2026
Photo

💬 Привет, криптоэнтузиаст! Давай обсудим, как криптовалюты изменяют глобальные экономические тренды. 🌍🤔 Ты когда-нибудь задумывался о том, как эта "цифровая революция" может повлиять на традиционные финансовые системы? Многие экономисты утверждают, что криптовалюты не просто мимолетный тренд, они способны пересмотреть основы экономики. Я вижу, как страны активно начинают внедрять свои цифровые валюты, создавая при э…

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @RA_BAAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RA_BAAL edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 October 2026
Most recent edit
7 October 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“серия токенов 👑 ЦАРЬ” (@RA_BAAL), 20,364 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RA_BAAL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.