Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quiz Question

Channel

Quiz Question

@QuizQuestionEnglish

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,585subscribers

-193 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002240500038
TypeChannel
Usernames@QuizQuestionEnglish @r_quiz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/QuizQuestionEnglish

Growth

11,58511,77811,681.57 August 2026 — 11,778 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,778 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,778 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,773 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,772 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,764 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,756 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,746 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,737 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,725 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,719 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,690 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,676 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,668 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,666 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,659 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,642 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,588 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,589 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,585 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 11 days, net -193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,556–11,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 12:3311,585-4
17 Aug 2026, 19:5711,589+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:3811,588-54
16 Aug 2026, 17:3511,642-17
15 Aug 2026, 14:2311,659-7
15 Aug 2026, 00:2611,666-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:4411,668-8
13 Aug 2026, 12:4811,676-14
12 Aug 2026, 19:3311,690-15
12 Aug 2026, 11:5811,705-14
11 Aug 2026, 21:3511,719-6
11 Aug 2026, 13:4411,725-12
10 Aug 2026, 21:1111,737-9
10 Aug 2026, 12:1211,746-10
9 Aug 2026, 19:0211,756-8
9 Aug 2026, 11:0811,764-8
8 Aug 2026, 19:0511,772-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:3611,773-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:4511,778no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:0011,778first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 11,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.667%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held31 (18 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total30,591
Reactions total192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

212 reactions across 28 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12759.9%
😭6932.5%
😢94.25%
🤔20.943%
🥰20.943%
👍10.472%
👏10.472%
😴10.472%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC310 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

Leo told us that he ___ the movie already, so he didn't want to watch it again.

  1. has seen30%
  2. had seen46%
  3. sees13%
  4. would see12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC453 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

My grandfather ___ own a small bakery in the center of town, but he retired years ago.

  1. used to38%
  2. would15%
  3. was used to29%
  4. use to17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC523 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

On his way home, Mark stopped ___ some milk, so he arrived a bit late.

  1. buying28%
  2. to buy40%
  3. buy19%
  4. for buying13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8

14 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC585 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

To enter the hidden garden, we had to squeeze ___ a small gap in the old stone wall.

  1. to17%
  2. into34%
  3. through30%
  4. across19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8

13 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC656 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

When he was only four years old, my brother ___ already read simple books.

  1. can21%
  2. could41%
  3. should18%
  4. must20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8

12 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC728 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

I ___ speak French fluently when I lived in Paris, but I have forgotten most of it now.

  1. should25%
  2. could42%
  3. must19%
  4. might14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

11 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC752 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

We have very ___ space left in the garage, so we can't fit another bicycle.

  1. few29%
  2. little49%
  3. many22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

10 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC882 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

The historic library is famous for ___ beautiful stained-glass windows.

  1. its37%
  2. it's49%
  3. its'14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

9 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC988 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

We would have gone to the beach if it ___ so heavily yesterday.

  1. didn't rain29%
  2. hadn't rained30%
  3. wouldn't rain24%
  4. doesn't rain17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😭113

8 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

If we had rented a smaller car, we ___ so much money on petrol during our road trip.

  1. wouldn't have spent41%
  2. wouldn't spend27%
  3. won't spend17%
  4. didn't spend15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😢64

7 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC984 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

I ___ believe in ghosts when I was a child, but I don't anymore.

  1. would24%
  2. used to42%
  3. use to18%
  4. am used to16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

6 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

I'm afraid I have very ___ information about the schedule change, so you should ask at the front desk.

  1. few24%
  2. many20%
  3. little37%
  4. a few20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @QuizQuestionEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 31 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz120 voters

Leo told us that he ___ the movie already, so he didn't want to watch it again.

  1. has seen30%
  2. had seen46%
  3. sees13%
  4. would see12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz156 voters

My grandfather ___ own a small bakery in the center of town, but he retired years ago.

  1. used to38%
  2. would15%
  3. was used to29%
  4. use to17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz166 voters

On his way home, Mark stopped ___ some milk, so he arrived a bit late.

  1. buying28%
  2. to buy40%
  3. buy19%
  4. for buying13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz178 voters

To enter the hidden garden, we had to squeeze ___ a small gap in the old stone wall.

  1. to17%
  2. into34%
  3. through30%
  4. across19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz198 voters

When he was only four years old, my brother ___ already read simple books.

  1. can21%
  2. could41%
  3. should18%
  4. must20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz224 voters

I ___ speak French fluently when I lived in Paris, but I have forgotten most of it now.

  1. should25%
  2. could42%
  3. must19%
  4. might14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,149,866 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quiz Question” (@QuizQuestionEnglish), 11,585 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuizQuestionEnglish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.