Channel
@QuintesAnnouncements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002181918503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QuintesAnnouncements |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 16 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QuintesAnnouncements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 76 | -1 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 19:22 | 77 | no change |
| 7 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 77 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
143 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 47 | 32.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 43 | 30.1% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 22.4% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 8.39% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.20% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2024 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New thread is live on X about one of the biggest hidden problems in the market: too much collateral sitting idle. Read it, then come back here and tell us where you think the best product design opportunities are 🦉 Tweet 🦉
You do not understand a protocol by looking at it in calm markets. You understand it by asking what happens when volatility hits. That is why collateral design matters. A strong buffer is not decoration. It is what protects confidence when conditions stop being friendly. Resilience is part of the product. Tweet 🦉
Most “yield” conversations in Web3 are still anchored on emissions and headline APYs that fade as incentives unwind. That model is starting to show its limits. What’s more interesting now is what protocols do with real collateral. At Quintes, a portion of deployed assets is actively managed through institutional strategies like market making, arbitrage, and HFT, using regulated custody and off exchange settlement …
🔥4
Most people think QNFT is just another collectible. It’s not. It’s your access pass to: → Higher testnet rewards → Early protocol access → First-mover advantage Check your eligibility 👇 mint.quintes.org Tweet 🦉
❤3🔥1
DeFi in 2026 is not about who has the biggest APY number. It is about who can actually deliver it. The protocols that survived the last cycle had one thing in common: real economics, not token incentives dressed up as yield. Triple-digit APYs are gone. Institutional capital is now asking different questions. What is the mechanism. Does it survive scale. Is it audited. Quintes was built for exactly this inflection…
🔥7
QNT is not just another yield token. It tracks an index that rises 0.235% every 3 days. That is 33% annually, governance-controlled. Every QNT is backed 2:1 by wBTC, ETH, or USDC. Redeemable anytime. No dependency on trading volume. No emissions masking as yield. This is what engineered appreciation looks like when the mechanics are actually built right. Tweet 🦉
⚡7❤4🔥1
Big news 🚨 We’re partnering with OKX to level up our ecosystem — stronger execution rails + improved trading utility. More details soon 🦉
❤7👍1
Hey Quintillionaires 🦉 Happy to annouce the launch of the new Quintes website and official waitlist. Explore the refreshed experience, learn how the Quintes Protocol works, and choose your access path! Standard email signup or advanced TEE onboarding powered by iExec for secure, priority access. Early participants will be positioned for up to 33% sustainable yield at launch. Visit https://www.quintes.org/ and joi…
🔥7❤2👍1
Quintes Zealy Campaign is LIVE! - Not every campaign is worth your time. - And not every NFT is worth holding. - This one is different 💎 - Top 100 on the Quintes Zealy leaderboard - 1 exclusive QNFT each - Limited supply. Real value. Earned, not given. If you believe effort should be rewarded properly — you’re in the right place. https://x.com/Quintesorg/status/2009724285925941735
❤🔥8
The wait is almost over… Get ready to unlock something special in the Quintes ecosystem. Stay tuned for the drop! It’s closer🦉 https://x.com/Quintesorg/status/2008576559914140043
❤🔥6🔥1
Cheers to 2026 💥 This past year, we built more than a protocol! we built trust, transparency, and a foundation for ethical, Shariah-aligned DeFi. From strategic partnerships and institutional backing to rigorous audits and innovative dual-token design, every step was about creating something lasting and meaningful. In 2026, Quintes isn’t just aiming higher! it’s aiming for greatness. More resilience, more accessibi…
❤10
Clock’s ticking ⌛️, - Quintes testnet is near, built over 2 years of R&D. Early contributors get access + a limited Quintes Card. Be there from the start. Unlock what’s coming. https://x.com/Quintesorg/status/2001329116721914265?s=20
❤🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QuintesAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quintes Official Announcements” (@QuintesAnnouncements), 76 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuintesAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.