Channel
@QudratAbdurahimov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,999subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001458438855 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QudratAbdurahimov |
| Created | 24 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QudratAbdurahimov |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 1,999 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 2,003 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 2,007 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 2,012 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 2,015 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 2,021 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 2,024 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 2,025 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 2,027 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 2,033 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 2,037 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 2,041 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 2,045 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 2,043 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,044 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 2,044 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
167 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 84 | 50.3% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 32.3% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 8.98% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 6.59% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Institutsional boshqaruv Institutsional boshqaruvda hatto biznes egasi (asoschisi) ham o‘zi o‘rnatgan tizim va qoidalarga bo‘ysunadi. U endi "men xo‘jayinman, nima xohlasam shuni qilaman" deb individual qarorlar chiqarolmaydi. Bu nima uchun kerak va amalda qanday ishlaydi? 1. Biznes egasi va Biznesning o‘zi ajratiladi Egasining shaxsiy hamyoni bilan kompaniya g‘aznasi, egasining shaxsiy xohishi bilan kompaniyaning …
🔥2👍1
"Biz faqat mashinalar ishlab chiqarmaymiz, biz avvalo odamlarni yetishtiramiz." Bu so‘zlar dunyo avtosanoati giganti – Toyota kompaniyasining boshqaruv falsafasini belgilab beruvchi eng bosh mezon hisoblanadi. Ko‘pchilik bizneslar bor e'tiborini faqat mahsulot sifatiga yoki texnologiyaga qaratadi. Toyota esa muvaffaqiyat kalitini butunlay boshqa joydan topgan. Ular buni ikkita egizak tushuncha bilan tushuntirishadi:…
👍5
Hali SI bilan ishlashni boshlamagan bo‘lsangiz. UzTech UK jamoasi bilan AI Darslari ishlab chiqishni boshlagan edik. Bugun shu darslar to‘plamini YouTubega alohida ro‘yxat qilib joylashibdi. Agar hali ham Sun’iy Intellekt (SI=AI) bilan do‘stlasha olmagan bo‘lsangiz. Faoliyatingizda qo‘llashni boshlamagan bo`lsangiz, birrov ko‘rib chiqishni tavsiya etaman. Qo‘rquv o‘zimizda - aslida hammasi oson. Bu darslar boshl…
👍4
Bu sizning qaroringiz! Psixologiyada juda ajoyib bir qoida bor: "Hech kim sizning roziligingizsiz sizni xafa qila olmaydi." Ya’ni, tashqi ta’sirlardan ranjish yoki ranjimaslik — bu mutlaqo sizning tanlovingiz. Buni bugungi kunda hissiyot ilmi, ya’ni hissiy intellekt (EQ) ham to‘liq tasdiqlaydi. #Baxt ham xuddi shunday... Inson o‘zini baxtli deb his qilsa — baxtli, baxtsiz deb bilsa — baxtsizdir. Negaki, moddiy ola…
🔥12❤1
📈 Муаммоларни кабинетда эмас, «воқеа жойида» ҳал қиламиз #Gemba Management: Кайдзен фалсафасида Gemba (Гемба) — бу қиймат яратиладиган, яъни бевосита иш кетаётган жой (ишлаб чиқариш, қурилиш майдони, офис ёки хизмат кўрсатиш нуқтаси). Муваффақиятли раҳбар жараёнларни фақат ҳисоботлардан эмас, Гембага бориб ўрганади. 📌 Гемба бошқарувининг 5 та олтин қоидаси: 1️⃣ Go to Gemba — Воқеа жойига боринг ва вазиятни ўз кўзинг…
❤4👍1🔥1
Oliy maqsad! Mening oliy maqsadim McKinsey elagidan oʻtdi (10/10 ball!) 🎯 Yaqinda oʻz oldimga qoʻygan oliy maqsadimni McKinsey & Company’ning mashhur "Centered Leadership" (Markazlashgan yetakchilik) modeli asosida tahlil qildim. Natija men kutgandan ham aʼlo — 10 dan 10 ball! Sunʼiy intellekt bu maqsad shunchaki orzu emas, balki shaxsiy iqtidor, biznes-mantiq va jamiyat ehtiyojini birlashtirgan mukammal strategik …
👍12
Zamonaviy tadbirkor! Qarang odamlar AI orqali nimalar qilyapti. Bu boladan zo'r tadbirkor chiqadi. Faqat sal AI ni imkoniyatlarini o'rganishi kerak. Tadbirkor do'stlarga jo'natib qo'yamiz :) @QudratAbdurahimov - Тизимли бошқарув ва рақамли трансформация эксперти P.S. Ko'rib maza qildim. Avaz Oxun xazillaridan kam emas :)
😁11
Bodo Sheferdan shaxsiy moliya arxitekturasi: 3 ta oltin bosqich Ko‘pchilik birdaniga milliarder bo‘lishni xohlaydi — bu sport zaliga birinchi kuni kelib 200 kg tosh ko‘tarishga urinishdek gap. Bodo Shefer boylikni bosqichma-bosqich, poydevordan qurishni maslahat beradi. 🛡 1-bosqich: Moliyaviy Himoya (Финансовая защита) Maqsad: Kutilmagan inqirozlarda (kasallik, ishdan ayrilish) sizni asraydigan "xavfsizlik yostiqch…
👍11🔥2❤1
Tavsiya qilaman! Video 2 soat ekan. 1 soatdan oshganda to'xtatmoqchi edim, lekin oxirigacha ko'rdim. Maslahatim to'liq ko'ring, afsuslanmaysiz. Toni Robbins (Tony Robbins) — dunyodagi eng taniqli motivator, shaxsiy rivojlanish bo'yicha murabbiy (life coach), biznes-strateg va bestseller kitoblar muallifidir. U o'zining jo'shqin nutqlari, multimillion dollarlik biznes imperiyasi va inson psixologiyasini o'zgartiris…
🔥4
Claude Opus 4.8 + Narxi o‘zgarmapti. + Fast mode 3x marta arzonlashgan. + Vazifaga qanchalik chuqur kirishi nazorati qo‘shilibdi (Effort control) + Xatosini tan olish 4x marta kamaygan. - Katta o‘zgarish yo‘q. Bor narsani sifati oshgan. - Token soni ko‘paydi: Effort control rejimida "extra" yoki "max" yoqilsa. Hozircha shu farqlarni sezdim. Siz qanday faralarni ko‘rdingiz? http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-…
👍8👎1
Менежментнинг отаси! Питер Друкер — замонавий менежментнинг «отаси» ва асосчиси. Қуйида унинг сара фикрлари берилган: 1️⃣ Ҳаётимизнинг мақсади — одамларга ижобий таъсир қилиш, ўзимизни ақлли эканимизни исботлаш эмас. (Цель нашей жизни — оказывать положительное влияние на людей, а не что-то доказывать). 2️⃣ Бошқарув (менежмент) — ишларни тўғри бажариш; Лидерлик эса — тўғри ишларни бажариш. (Management is doing thi…
👍10
Dasturchidan Raqamli boshqaruvga o‘tish Faqat sun’iy intellektning o‘zini o‘rganish xato yoki yana kodingga qaytish ham xato. Chunki koding narxi arzonlashyapti, lekin Sizning narxingiz oshishi kerak! Ertaga tajribali dasturchilar keyingi qadamda nima qilishi kerak? (Next Level: Senior to Digital Management) Qanday qilib har qanday vaziyatda talabgir kadr bo‘lish haqida gaplashamiz. ✍️ Qudrat Abdurahimov “Mega Bui…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @QudratAbdurahimov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qudrat Abdurahimov” (@QudratAbdurahimov), 1,999 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QudratAbdurahimov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.