Channel
@Quantitativesharing01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,497subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001561930185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Quantitativesharing01 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Quantitativesharing01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 2,497 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 2,500 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 2,501 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
17 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 58.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 21 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Why Join Space-AI? Exclusive market analysis, investment tips, and information on the most promising tokens help you stay ahead of the curve. Whether you're a seasoned investor or a newcomer, we bring you the pulse of the blockchain space and provide a wealth of knowledge to help you make informed decisions. This investor started with just $12, and gradually grew their capital—reaching $407, $2440, $29480, and fin…
👍3❤1🔥1
Alphabet surpasses Apple in global rankings Google's market capitalization jumped to second place, while Apple fell to third. Investor confidence remains strong thanks to Google's AI strategy and infrastructure investments. Therefore, investing in space-ai is the most reliable and stable way to generate returns. Don't hesitate, join now and start profiting immediately! New users can register for free: https://space-…
❤2
A Polymarket user has won over $400,000 by betting on the removal of the Venezuelan president. An anonymous Polymarket user placed a $32,000 bet on the removal of the Venezuelan president and ultimately won over $400,000.
Is cryptocurrency truly "on the verge of extinction"? Data offers a different answer. Despite mainstream media's constant portrayal of cryptocurrency as doomsday, cryptocurrency projects are developing at a faster pace than even the hottest artificial intelligence startups. Charts show the speed at which companies reach $100 million in revenue—the cryptocurrency sector is far ahead. Hyperliquid achieved this in jus…
space.8💵💵💵 pinned a photo
In the Aster trading competition, the AI team's losses were significantly lower than those of human traders. Human traders lost approximately $225,000, while the neural network lost only $13,000. Even during market downturns, the AI demonstrated more stable performance. This result provides strong evidence for algorithmic trading. Therefore, investing in space-ai will make your returns safer and more stable! …
Cryptocurrency optimists on the X platform believe the current market is following a classic "market psychology cycle." According to this view, January may see accelerated gains and market euphoria, while February could enter a full-blown frenzy, with expectations of a bullish season for cryptocurrency prices and high returns. This view is based on recurring sentiment patterns within the cycle.
According to CertiK data, while the number of cryptocurrency hacks decreased in 2025, losses remained high, reaching $3.3 billion. The average loss per attack increased, making the associated risks more concentrated and dangerous. All investments in space-ai offer higher security and more stable returns!
A whole day's income.
❤1
The actual daily income of a new member!
❤1
Elon Musk becomes the first person in history to surpass a net worth of $60 billion. Space-based artificial intelligence is about to usher in a new era of profitability!
space.8💵💵💵 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Quantitativesharing01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 117,409 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Quantitativesharing01 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“space.8💵💵💵” (@Quantitativesharing01), 2,497 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Quantitativesharing01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.