Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QuantHiveAI Free Daily Trading Signals

Channel

QuantHiveAI Free Daily Trading Signals

@QuantHiveAI_Announcements

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

4,502subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002363768177
TypeChannel
Username@QuantHiveAI_Announcements
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/QuantHiveAI_Announcements

Growth

4,5024,5264,5147 August 2026 — 4,526 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,522 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,519 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,516 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,515 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,512 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,509 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,507 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,502 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 28 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,498–4,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:164,502-5
1 Sept 2026, 09:044,507-2
29 Aug 2026, 19:064,509-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:564,512-3
20 Aug 2026, 23:144,515-1
17 Aug 2026, 14:234,516-3
14 Aug 2026, 04:084,519-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:574,522-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:154,526no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:094,526first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1155.0%
🙏420.0%
🔥315.0%
👍15.00%
😁15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 19 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2025, 15:16 UTC169 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

High TPI Token Spotlight: $SKY $SKY just lit up the charts with a TPI score of 85.5 — triggering a WAGMI buy signal fueled by smart money inflows. 📊 3 alpha wallets bought $15.5K, while only 3 sold $2.6K — signaling clear buy-side dominance from consistently profitable traders. 🗯 Are alpha wallets getting hyped about $SKY? What do they know that we don’t? 📈 TPI (Traders' Profitability Index) measures buy vs sell

🙏1

18 Aug 2025, 14:29 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$NAVX just flashed a WAGMI buy signal with a solid TPI score of 63.3 — momentum is down -10.84%, suggesting smart money might be positioning early. Could a pump be on the way in the next few days? 📊 715 alpha wallets scooped up $228K, while 756 sold $132K — signaling clear buy-side pressure from top-performing traders. 🗯 Are alpha traders getting hyped about $NAVX? 📈 Alpha Trader Flow Signals are based on TPI + Mo

🙏1

17 Aug 2025, 14:48 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$SEND just flashed a WAGMI buy signal with a solid TPI score of 66.5 — momentum is down -33.92%, suggesting smart money might be positioning early. Could a pump be on the way in the next few days? 📊 247 alpha wallets scooped up $64K, while 354 sold $32.2K — signaling clear buy-side pressure from top-performing traders. 🗯 Are alpha traders getting hyped about $SEND? 📈 Alpha Trader Flow Signals are based on TPI + Mo

1

16 Aug 2025, 16:00 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

High TPI Token Spotlight: $TIBBIR $TIBBIR just lit up the charts with a TPI score of 71.1 — triggering a WAGMI buy signal fueled by smart money inflows. 📊 45 alpha wallets bought $42.6K, while only 20 sold $17.3K — showing clear buy-side dominance from consistently profitable traders. 🗯 Are alpha wallets getting hyped about $TIBBIR? What do they know that we don’t? 📈 TPI (Traders' Profitability Index) measures bu

1

15 Aug 2025, 15:05 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$ENA just flashed a WAGMI buy signal with a solid TPI score of 61.3 — momentum is up 63.68%, suggesting smart money might be positioning early. Could a pump be on the way in the next few days? 📊 9 alpha wallets scooped up $348K, while 12 sold $219K — signaling clear buy-side pressure from top-performing traders. 🗯 Are alpha traders getting hyped about $ENA? 📈 Alpha Trader Flow Signals are based on TPI + Momentum f

🙏1

14 Aug 2025, 13:32 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$PLAYFUN just flashed a WAGMI buy signal with a solid TPI score of 68.5 — momentum is currently down -78.92%, hinting that smart money might be positioning early. Could a pump be on the way in the next few days? 📊 95 alpha wallets scooped up $44.1K, while 42 sold $20.2K — showing clear buy-side pressure from top-performing traders. 🗯 Are alpha traders getting hyped about $PLAYFUN? 📈 Alpha Trader Flow Signals are b

👍1

13 Aug 2025, 14:21 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$MICRO just lit up the alpha trader radar — exploding +2,123.81% with a solid TPI score of 67.4. Today alone, 23 tracked alpha wallets aped in with $16.5K in buy volume. 🗯 What do these alpha traders know about $MICRO that we don’t? 📈 Momentum = short-term vs long-term volume from top traders — a key signal that hype may be building early. 🪙 Trade $MICRO on QuantHiveAI and farm points while you’re at it 👉 https://

1

12 Aug 2025, 13:54 UTC28 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

High TPI Token Spotlight: $XIAOBAI $XIAOBAI just lit up the charts with a TPI score of 62.9, triggering a WAGMI buy signal fueled by smart money inflows. 📊 89 alpha wallets bought $53.7K, while only 43 sold $31.7K — a clear sign of buy-side dominance from consistently profitable traders. 🗯 Are alpha wallets getting hyped about $XIAOBAI? What do they know that we don’t? 📈 TPI (Traders' Profitability Index) measure

🔥1

11 Aug 2025, 14:30 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$WAL just flashed a WAGMI buy signal with a solid TPI score of 59.5 — backed by strong momentum at +84.29%, hinting that smart money might be positioning early. Could a pump be on the way in the next few days? 📊 1,604 alpha wallets scooped up $15.1M, while 1,938 sold $10.3M — showing clear buy-side pressure from top-performing traders. 🗯 Are alpha traders getting hyped about $WAL on the Sui Network? What do they kn

1

10 Aug 2025, 15:40 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$FUD just flashed a WAGMI buy signal with a strong TPI score of 80.1 — showing impressive momentum at +1180.28% and signs that smart money may be positioning early. Could a pump be coming in the next few days? 📊 158 alpha wallets scooped up $36.9K, while only 145 sold $9.1K — a clear sign of buy-side pressure from top-performing traders. 🗯 Are alpha traders getting hyped about $FUD on the Sui Network? What do they

1

9 Aug 2025, 15:03 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$SKI just lit up the alpha trader radar — with strong momentum at +81.69% and a solid TPI score of 79.8. Today alone, 40 tracked alpha wallets aped in with $26.7K in buy volume. 🗯 What do alpha traders know about $SKI that we don’t? 📈 Momentum = short-term vs long-term volume from top traders — a key signal that hype may be building early. 🪙 Trade $SKI on QuantHiveAI and farm points while you’re at it 👉 https://ap

1

8 Aug 2025, 15:44 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

High TPI Token Spotlight: $ONDO $ONDO just lit up the charts with a TPI score of 57.6, triggering a WAGMI buy signal driven by smart money inflows. 📊 17 alpha wallets bought $100K, while only 8 sold $74.2K — showing clear buy-side dominance from consistently profitable traders. 🗯 Are alpha wallets getting hyped about $ONDO? What do they know that we don’t? 📈 TPI (Traders' Profitability Index) measures buy vs sell

🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QuantHiveAI_Announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QuantHiveAI Free Daily Trading Signals” (@QuantHiveAI_Announcements), 4,502 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuantHiveAI_Announcements.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.