Channel
@QuPedia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,041subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001994228894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QuPedia |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QuPedia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 3,041 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 3,042 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,044 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @QuPedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 September 2025 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
و در ادامه جزییات فرمان اجرایی ترامپ روی فناوری های کوانتومی: (iii) prevent countries of concern from acquiring critical quantum-enabling technologies, through, for example, harmonizing research security and export control policies with international allies and partners; منبع سایت وایت هاوس @QuPedia
Trump on Quantum :))))))))))))) @Qupedia
مقاله ارکایو جدید که بنظر دنیای کامپیوتر کوانتومی رو یه تکون حسابی میده، دیدگاه اینه که الگوریتم شور رو میشه با ۱۰ هزار کیوبیت پیاده سازی کرد. قبلا پیش بینی میشد که برای پیاده سازی بهینه این الگوریتم در مقیاس صنعتی به چندین ملیون کیوبیت نیاز هست. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627
🟢معیار TRL برای انواع زیرساخت های فناوری های کوانتومی از دیدگاه ChatGPTو Gemini 💥معیار Technology Readiness Level یا همون TRL نشون میده که یک فناوری چقدر به تجاری سازی و توسعه در مقیاس صنعتی آماده تر هست و هرچه عدد به ۱۰ نزدیک تر باشه ینی بهتره توسعه داده شده… 🌐Join: @QuPedia #اینفوگرافیک ➡️🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🅰️⬅️
⭕️ نقشه راه های IBM و گوگل چه امیدهای واهی به جامعه کوانتوم تحویل میدن تا همچنان بودجه بگیرن و در صدر جدول Main Stream بمونن؟؟؟ 🪩از طرفی ادعا های زیادی از سمت ibm شد که تا سال ۲۰۳۰ ما یک میلیون کیوبیت داریم. اما الان توی نقشه راه جدید فقط قصد دارند پردازنده های ۱۲۰ کیوبیتی رو توسط Quantum interconnect ها بهم متصل کنن و یه پلتفرم ماجولار درست کنن. چند روز پیش هم خبر همکاری ibm و cisco برای توسعه distributed quantum …
🟢Review Paper: Quantum Machine Learning (2025) 🌐Join: @QuPedia #مقاله_مروری ➡️🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🅰️⬅️
🟢مقاله ریویو جدید برای "مقدمات یادگیری ماشین کوانتومی" 💥تاریخ انتشار: 2025 نوامبر ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔖برای دانلود مقاله روی این لینک کلیک کنید. 🌐Join: @QuPedia #مقاله_مروری #یادگیری_ماشین_کوانتومی ➡️🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🅰️⬅️
😱شرکت IBM وقتی هرسال پردازنده کوانتومی با همون تعداد کیوبیت رو به عنوان «نقشه راه» جدیدش معرفی میکنه: 🌐Join: @QuPedia
📢 دوره آموزشی اطلاعات و محاسبات کوانتومی📢 🚨Understanding Quantum Information and Computation 💬مدرس: جان واتروس 🐢مدرس: Qiskit و IBM 🍡تعداد جلسات: 16 📝تعداد ویدیو ها: 16 🐍پیش نیاز: جبر خطی مقدماتی و اعداد مختلط ✅زبان انگلیسی 📌برای دانلود ویدیو جلسات روی این لینک کلیک کنید. 🌐Join: @QuPedia
⭕️Types of Quantum AI 🌐 Join: @QuPedia #اینفوگرافیک
⭕️ بروبچه های Superconductivity و کیوبیت های ابررسانا جایزه نوبل فیزیک امسال و بردن. ⭕️ الان تو IBM و Google دارن بندری میرقصن 🌐Join: @QuPedia #خبر
📹شرکت های اصلی و فعال توی هر پنج فناوری پیشرو در سخت افزار کیوبیت به لحاظ تعداد ثبت اختراع 🌐Join: @QuPedia #اینفوگرافیک
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @QuPedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 101,967 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کیوپدیا | QuPedia” (@QuPedia), 3,041 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuPedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.