2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 04:16
62
no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:15
62
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 15 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
10
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
32
91.4%
🕊
2
5.71%
❤🔥
1
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2022 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✈️✈️✈️🩷📚
🤩 همایش پرواز آینده:
🌌🌌 معرفی رشته هوافضا برای انتخاب رشته
🤩 جهان هوافضا را کشف کن
🌙 ویژهی دانشآموزان، کنکوریها، دانشجویان و علاقهمندان به هوافضا
🛰🛰 سخنرانان
✅ دکتر وحید راستینسب از موسسه تکنولوژی پکن
مهندسی مکاترونیک / مهندسی فضایی گرایش ماهواره
✅ بهاره خواجوی از دانشگاه صنعتی شریف
مهندسی هوافضا
✅ محمدحسین رستمخانی از دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر (پلیتکنیک تهران)
مهندسی…
🔻آنتنپوش(رِیدوم | Radome) چیست؟
🔸شاید شما هم این خبر را شنیدهاید که برای نخستینبار در تاریخ صنعت هوانوردی ایران، یکی از آنتنها را مجهز به تکنولوژی ریدوم کردهاند.
بنا به گفته مدیر کل ارتباطات و ناوبری هوایی شرکت فرودگاهها و ناوبری هوایی ایران؛ سامانه نظارتی رادار تقرب فرودگاه امام(ره) به ریدوم مجهز شده است و در همین هفته به بهرهبرداری خواهد رسید.
گفتهشده پوشش حفاظتی آنتن(Radome) به صورت کاملاً بومی و برای نخس…
ادامه...
در حاشیه اکتشافات و دستاوردهای جدید
و برنامههایی که در این پروژه هستند، ۱۰
کیوبست² (مدارگرد ریز) هست که عموما
دارای تجهیزات پیشرفته مخابرات
مسافتهای طولانی ³(LDC) هستند.
دوتای آنها به سفارش اداره فناوریهای
فضایی آینده برای اکتشافات جدید؛ سهتای
دیگر از اداره عوامل انسانی و کنترل ماموریت-
های عملیاتی؛ دوتای دیگر از کنترل مأموریت-
های علمی و سهتای دیگر آن با سازمانهای
فضایی همکار ناسا از …
آرتمیس ۱ و مخابرات فضایی
آرتمیس ۱ پروازی آزمایشی برای پروژه
گسترده آرتمیس ناسا است. این پرواز
نخستین پرواز یکپارچه ماژول اوریون
و سامانه پرتاب فضایی است. اوریون
جدیدترین کپسول فضاپیمای سازمان
فضایی ناسا برای حمل انسان به فضا و
کشفیّات دوردست از جمله سیارهٔ مریخ
است. مراحل اجرایی این فضاپیما پس
از اتمام برنامهٔ شاتل و ناوگان شاتل کلید
خورد. طبق آخرین برنامه اعلامشده، قرار
است که این پرواز در ۲۹ آگوست ۲۰۲۲
برابر با ۷…
A 1950s-era British strategic bomber the size of an Airbus A321, the Victor has perhaps the strongest resemblance to fictional enemy spacecraft than any other.
With the huge angled Y-tail, the bizarre-looking engine intakes, and proportions straight out of a science fiction novel, it’s really a shame none remain flying today.
We are, however, quite fortunate that four examples (of the original 86 built) remain on dis…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Qoqnoos_CATC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Radome(en.wikipedia.org) “…|last=Latifiyan |first=Pouya |date=August 28, 2022 |title=What is Radome? |url=https://t.me/Qoqnoos_CATC/13 |journal=Qoqnoos Scientific Magazine |volume=1 |pages=13}}…” read 16 August 2026
Радіопрозорий купол(uk.wikipedia.org) “…journal|last=Latifiyan|first=Pouya|date=28 серпня 2022|title=What is Radome?|url=https://t.me/Qoqnoos_CATC/13|journal=Qoqnoos Scientific Magazine|volume=1|pages=13}}…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نشریه مجازی ققنوس - CATC” (@Qoqnoos_CATC), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qoqnoos_CATC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.