Channel
@Qiyuebaob
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
756subscribers
+262 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004499950484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Qiyuebaob |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Qiyuebaob |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 756 | +99 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 657 | +106 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 551 | +57 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 494 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 494 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 July 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 998 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 椒江柒月 @qiyuebaobao1 半价活动 🎁 奖品清单 • 半价券 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 台州老司机 • 加入 柒月动态👀 • 加入 台州-老司机-公开榜 • 参加抽奖后需在 台州老司机 内发言188次 └ 群内发送“抽奖进度”查看完成度（每日限5次） • 必须设置用户名 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-08-26 14:00:00 📜 抽奖说明 抽奖有效期为中奖日3日内有效，必须写报告， 报告 找 @tzqwbot 机器人填写（填写报告还有机会拿白嫖哦） ✨ 愿命运之剑指引你们前行，直至胜利之光照耀每一个人。
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
想双飞的抓紧咯，就明天一天 @Taizhouwanyu
明天1点开课可约
评价时间:2026-07-07 评价昵称:匿名 老师名字:柒月 【推荐程度】： 5⭐️夯 【所在位置】：椒江 【身高身材】：173大长腿 【人照相似】：9分 【安全性】：不出击最安全 【修车水费】：800 【凶器罩杯】：b 【颜值打分】： 7分 【出击过程】： 和老师约好时间后，便满怀期待地前往工作室。上楼前老师特意用遥控开门，这份谨慎细致的职业态度，瞬间就拉满了我的好感度。 房门打开的那一刻，眼前的画面让人眼前一亮——迎面迎来的是一位高挑、大长腿的东北姑娘。进屋落座后，老师先是贴心地递上一瓶矿泉水，随和地陪我闲聊了几句，紧凑的气氛一下子就放松了下来。 简单寒暄后便直奔主题。沐浴环节老师做得非常细致，每一个部位都照顾得体贴入微，洗完后还会温柔地帮我擦干。顺从地趴在床上，老师的身体游走便如期而至。从胸推到臀推，整套“过水漫游”行云流水。期间的绝活更是让人直呼过瘾，顶得我一阵酥酥麻麻。期间舒雅老师还趁我不注意，调皮地挠了挠我的脚心…
❤2
下课 🉑预约 明天 😄
❤1
柒月动态👀 pinned a photo
联系 @qiyuebaobao1
❤1
还有空位 可 约
柒月动态👀 pinned Deleted message
评价时间:2026-07-28 评价昵称:rita 老师名字:柒月 推荐程度4⭐ 【所在位置】：椒江 【 安 全 性 】：不出击最安全 【修车水费】：原8工4 【身高身材】：172 【人照相似】：7分相似吧，本人挺漂亮的 【颜值打分】：6分新标准 【凶器罩杯】：B 【服务内容】：课表都有 【服务详情】：提前约课进入教室，老师热情招呼坐下，抽了根烟前去共浴，很细心正反面都洗的很干净，进入教室b面起手，课表上的都过了一遍和晚玉的差不多，应该是一个地方学的，然后戴上🌂进入身体，出乎意料的是这么高的个子竟然很紧，凿起来感觉很好而且会夹，女上也是很强并且体力很好，但是不太耐桩，怜香惜玉的我于是按我的节奏猛凿出货，事后老师也是一起进入浴室细心的帮我洗干净 【机车行为】：无 【优点缺点】：长得好看服务多，但是不太耐桩
评价时间:2026-07-29 评价昵称:从此只吃御姐版 老师名字:柒月 【评价时间】26.7.29 评价昵称：从此只吃御姐 评价老师： 椒江 柒月 【推荐程度】：5⭐️夯 【所在位置】：椒江 【身高身材】：170+ 大长腿 【人照相似】：8-9 【安全性】：不cj最安全 【修车水费】：800 【凶器罩杯】：B+ 【颜值打分】：个人喜好不同 我打满分 【出击过程】：闲来无事 在群里求推荐御姐 康师傅主动推荐柒月老师 点开柒月老师的频道看了课表和照片以后 确认这是我喜欢的类型 果断联系 约好时间马不停蹄的赶了过去 小区还挺容易找的 找保安刷卡进门 被柒月老师遥控到课室 门开的一瞬间确实惊艳到我了 眼睛大大的 这五官就是我心中完美女人的样子 这双大长腿快赶上我命长了 果断交了水费。对比了一下身高 柒月老师穿的拖鞋 比我还要高一点 看见门口有双高跟鞋 果断让柒月老师换上 这次不用对比了 我快要仰头和她说话了。 寒…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Qiyuebaob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柒月动态👀” (@Qiyuebaob), 756 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qiyuebaob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.