5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,628–1,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:47
1,629
-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:00
1,633
+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:21
1,631
+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:34
1,630
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:17
1,630
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
184.5%
avg views ÷ 1,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (21 May 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
6,010
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
336 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
203
60.4%
👍
53
15.8%
👌
38
11.3%
😁
19
5.65%
🔥
5
1.49%
❤🔥
4
1.19%
👏
4
1.19%
💯
4
1.19%
😍
3
0.893%
🍌
2
0.595%
🐳
1
0.298%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тіркестен тіркес, сөйлемнен сөйлем, мәтіннен мәтін арпалысып жүрген күндердің бііір күні бір мысал кезігіп, Назгүл мынаны осы себепті былай деген екен ғой дейсің.
Каналдағы титтей мысалдың ар жағында мидың мыңғырық процесі барын түсінген өз алдына, кей нәрсеге өзің бетпе-бет келмесең, мән бермеуің мүмкін. Бір күні Итакаға оралғанда шетінен жайлааап отырып жазармын)
Әлімжан Асқар деген барып тұрған…
ерекше құбылыс екен ғой.
-уда, -уде дегенді мүлде қолданбай, футбол эфирінің етістігін күшті қылып өзгертіп тастапты.
Әдетте біздің еститініміз
ойнауда
тебуда
болуда
салуда мен
салмауда ғой).
Сосын таптаурын сөйлемдер бар. Күмәнсіз. Басқа дым жоқ.
Сондай ортада принципке барып, морфология-синтаксисіне кәдімгідей мән беріп отыр-ау. Знашыт, тегін адам емес. Біреулер "тікелей эфирде…
"тұйық етістік + үшін" дегеннің басқа да күшті барианттары бар):
"Мән-жайды білу үшін бардым" —
- Мән-жайды білейін деп бардым;
- Мән-жайды білмекке бардым;
- Мән-жайды білгелі бардым.
түріктер итке köpek дейді, бірақ қазақтың диалектілерінде көпек сөзі бар болғанымен, әдеби тілдегі күпек сөзі мүлде басқа нәрсені білдіреді — ол ұл бала сүндеттелгенде алынып тасталатын тері бөлшегінің атауы. орысша — крайняя плоть, ағылшынша — foreskin.
айтпақшы, сүндетке отырғызғанды піштіру деп жүрген достарыңызға айтыңыз: піштіру немесе пішу — басқа ұғым. шатаспайық!
осы орайда, бүгінгі жазбамызды оқи отырңызда…
бұл жігіт Шешенстанда емес, Қазақстанда екен, яғни "ұрлап әкетілген" — ол емес, әке-шешесі.
сосын "похищенные" деген — "ұрлап әкетілген" емес.
қазақша ақпаратты дұрыс түсіндім бе деп орысшасын тексеріп алуға мәжбүр бола берсек, аздап былай біртүрлі емес пе
Ербол өзінің физикаға әуестігінің зор болғанын айтады.
Қыз кассаның неліктен уақытша жұмыс істемей тұрғанын түсіндіреді.
Мектеп бізге осылай сөйлем құратып, осылай сөйлем талдатады-ау деймін. Бастауыш, баяндауыш, ортасындағы түгел күрделі тура толықтауыш десе жақсы, көбіне ана жерде ілік бар ма, демек, анықтауыш, одан кейін пысықтауыш тұр, одан кейін толықтауыш деп түсіндіреді. Тұрлаусыз мүшелерді ажыратуды үйренсі…
Бәленбай ғасыр өткеннен кейін біреу мұрағаттан Qazsport комментаторының "Колумбия — Мексикаға дерлік көрші ел" дегенін тауып алып, "міне, көрдіңдер ме, байырғы қазақтар осылай депті, демек, дұрысы — сол" деуі әбден мүмкін ғой, иә?!)
география да, лексика-грамматика да әдірем қалды-ау, номиналдыалаңиелеріңніңаузынассс
👍9❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QatalRedaktor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 242%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 109,862 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Қатал редактор” (@QatalRedaktor), 1,629 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QatalRedaktor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.