Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قطط وفضائح

Channel

قطط وفضائح

@QarooPost

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,220subscribers

+3,705 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420799586
TypeChannel
Username@QarooPost
Description🐱 قطط وفضائح 😂 | مقاطع مضحكة للقطط، مواقف طريفة، حركات مجنونة، ميمز القطط، فيديوهات كوميدية ولحظات لا تُقاوم من عالم القطط.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/QarooPost

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,4087,3494,878.56 August 2026 — 2,515 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,511 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,507 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,508 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,502 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,496 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,476 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,463 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,448 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,439 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,438 subscribers25 September 2026 — 2,417 subscribers4 October 2026 — 2,408 subscribers14 October 2026 — 4,156 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,195 subscribers20 October 2026 — 4,160 subscribers23 October 2026 — 4,079 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,020 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,349 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,220 subscribers6,2206 August 20262 November 2026
21 measurements spanning 88 days, net +3,705. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,667–8,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 05:386,220-1,129
29 Oct 2026, 20:497,349+329
27 Oct 2026, 05:187,020+2,941
23 Oct 2026, 19:574,079-81
20 Oct 2026, 11:094,160-2,035
17 Oct 2026, 10:466,195+2,039
14 Oct 2026, 17:294,156+1,748
4 Oct 2026, 21:012,408-9
25 Sept 2026, 18:552,417-21
15 Sept 2026, 01:212,438-1
11 Sept 2026, 01:592,439-9
6 Sept 2026, 12:162,448-15
2 Sept 2026, 05:122,463-13
26 Aug 2026, 09:422,476-11
22 Aug 2026, 23:562,487-9
19 Aug 2026, 10:222,496-6
16 Aug 2026, 19:462,502-6
13 Aug 2026, 07:362,508+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:222,507-4
7 Aug 2026, 07:212,511first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 30 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 6,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
35
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held55 (30 December 2025 – 4 November 2026)
Views total60,270
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈513
Videos
≈1,070
Links
≈1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 53s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤266.7%
👍133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.82%
1 of 55 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,490
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
525
over 54 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGHvkBB14 November 20264 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

هذا لكِ يا ناتاشا. قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

اضطر الأطباء لحلاقة المنطقة السفلية من هذا القط لإجراء عملية في رجليه الخلفيتين، فصار المسكين يمشي من دون سروال 😿 قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

لما تكون قطًا ناضجًا ورزينًا، وتطلب منك ماما الوقوف جنب الشجرة والتبسّم للصورة. قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

مساعد في لعبة البلياردو 😂 قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

لم تكن تنوي أن تفزع اليوم، لكن يبدو أن لا مفرّ من ذلك. قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 4 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGHvkBBPhoto

أحيانًا يكون إنقاذ حياة كائن آخر طريقًا لترميم حياتنا 🐾 نظن أن رعاية الحيوانات المشردة عطاء من طرف واحد، لكن كتاب كورتني غوستافسون «ثلاثون قطة، ولا واحدة غريبة» (دار «كو ليبري») يروي غير ذلك. هربت الكاتبة إلى مكان ناءٍ لتتجاوز الاكتئاب والقلق والوحدة، فوجدت ثلاثين قطة جائعة ومهجورة قرب حاويات القمامة. بدأت بمساعدتها وتقاسمت معها آخر علبة تونة، ولم تعرف أن القطط ستردّ لها الجميل، فتعيد إلى حياتها المعنى والمحبة وتسا…

4 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

عزيزي الدفتر، دخلنا اليوم الثالث من السنة الجديدة، وما زال أصحاب القدمين لا يعرفون كيف يهدؤون. قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

كانوا يخططون لشيء ما 😁 قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

مع هذا القط، ما عاد فيه حاجة لكلاب الحراسة 😁 قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

لديه طريقته الخاصة والمميزة في شرب الماء. قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 05:06 UTC822 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

من يعثر على القطة هنا، قد تصله بعض النقود على نحو مفاجئ قبل نهاية السنة… وربما لا 😸 قطط وفضائح

4 Nov 2026, 04:16 UTC402 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

ابقَ متيقظًا، أيها البشري ❗️ قطط وفضائح

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @QarooPost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Canvas Legacy
@Inspired_life24 · 36,234
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قطط وفضائح” (@QarooPost), 6,220 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QarooPost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.