5 measurements spanning 27 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 895–901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 02:36
896
-3
29 Aug 2026, 19:25
899
+2
23 Aug 2026, 02:18
897
-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:23
898
-2
13 Aug 2026, 12:33
900
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 2 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
92.3%
👌
1
7.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2022 to 27 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ♡
بشتري جروبات تليجرام من 2016 ل 2024 بسعر كويس جدا وأسعار خاصة للكميات 🔥🔥
ومعايا طريقة بتظهرلك كل جروباتك حتى اللي مسحتها ممكن ترجعها
مش بيفرق عدد الاعضاء لو عضو واحد بس هشتريه 🫡 ( بس متمحسش الرسايل )
لو جروب مفيش فيه رسايل ممكن ينفع جروب id ابعتلي اشوفه 🤙🏻
للتواصل @WELSO71N
صلو علي الحبيب المصطفي عليه افضل الصلاه وسلام🌿
نسالكم من صالح الدعاء لغزه 🫀
دعواتكم ليه ولكم المثل ❤️
اللهم في يوم الجمعة ، نسألك رحمةً و مغفرةً ، و أن تجعلنا من المقبولين عندك ، و أن تفرج همومنا و تيسر أمورنا .
اللهم ارزقنا خير هذا اليوم و خير ما فيه ، و اصرف عنا شره و شر ما فيه .
اللهم إنا نسألك الجنة و ما قـرب إليها من قول أو عمل ، و نعوذ بك من النار و ما قرب إليها من قول أو عمل❤️🩹.
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @QQPAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بوت ليكات مسابقات” (@QQPAQ), 896 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QQPAQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.