2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 18:26
61
+8
23 Aug 2026, 14:45
53
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 61 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.4
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 August 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
244
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 09s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5848408532617011506
3
27.3%
custom 5429223005882452995
2
18.2%
custom 5429389934081377203
2
18.2%
custom 5765032703321710825
2
18.2%
custom 5323607689899578177
1
9.09%
custom 5848310834995928364
1
9.09%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👻👻👻👻🥹ВОПРОС ДНЯ🥹
❤️новый день приносит новые мысли и идеи, а сегодня мы предлагаем вам задуматься над одним интересным вопросом, не спешите с ответом — возможно, он расскажет о вас больше, чем кажется на первый взгляд😉.
💎сегодняшний вопрос : какой ваш любимый вкус мороженого??
#инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙ_𝑸𝑯
🤍 🔤🔤🔤𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍 :;
〃Порой один шаг навстречу становится началом долгого пути. Пусть сегодняшний союз станет началом новой истории, где два пути соединятся под одним небом.〃
:; 🤩:; Сегодня проекты « . 𑄽୧ ˒˓𝖫ꪱᜒ𝗀ɦʈ 𝖲ʈ𝗋ꪱᜒթᥱ𝅄 🍓 𝆬𓂃 » и «۫𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐄𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐁𝐎𝐑» становятся единым целым.
🤩 — Надеемся на долгое, приятное и плодотворное сотрудничество! :;
🔤.. 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎 || .. 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄 🔤
— Следящий:; @IsagiCoowner_bot
🔹 🔤🔤.. 𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐘 ┆ 🌟 ┆
— Добрый день. Я создала этот флуд и всё это время вела его самостоятельно. Однако в скором времени начинается учёба, да и морально и эмоциональных становится трудно одной вести. Поэтому я решила найти человека, который сможет разделить со мной обязанности и стать совладельцем. Если вы заинтересованы в этой должности или знаете кого-то, кто хотел бы попробовать себя в роли совладельца, может…
🤍 🔤🔤..Good morning 🫧
🌟Утро светит мягким золотом, словно ангелы раскрывают небесные врата. Пусть вместе с первыми лучами в сердце войдут спокойствие, надежда и немного чуда. Ведь каждое новое утро — это тихое благословение свыше.🌟
🌺 — 🔤оброе утро всем кроме...
' 🔤. Не любите молочный шоколад..
🔤. Обожаете фисташквую пасту 🦇 '
🔤🔤.. Получили доброе утро?
— 🤩 Да. — 🌟 нет
𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞
𖥔𝓕𝕽𝐄𝐄⤹𝐒𝕺𝖀𝕷༘⋆
чистка
поиск союзов
ивент
⋅˚₊‧ 𝔖𝔢𝔞 𝔬𝔣 𝔰𝔭𝔦𝔯𝔦𝔱𝔰 ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅
изменение в расписании
поиск администрации
поиск монтажёров
поиск нью, администрации, союзов, вп
новое видео, новое видео, новое видео
чистка
᎒ 𝟲𝟲ٞ𝟲ׁ.« 𝐀𝗦ִؗٺ𝐓𝐑ׄ𝐄𝗔
новое видео, новое видео
𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗢𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗙𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗿
поиск союзов
𝐵𝑒𝓁𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓃𝓃𝒶 𝒻𝓁𝑜𝑜𝒹
новое видео
🌬️🍁𝑴𝒂𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒏𝒅
уход Мики
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QH_LIFFE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 861,882 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“۫| • 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐄𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐁𝐎𝐑 𝟭𝟱+// 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄 • |” (@QH_LIFFE), 61 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QH_LIFFE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.