Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عبارات قصف ستوريات‏ 𖣣🖤

Channel

عبارات قصف ستوريات‏ 𖣣🖤

@QG_QC

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,237subscribers

-219 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546001438
TypeChannel
Username@QG_QC
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/QG_QC

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,23511,47111,35311 August 2026 — 11,456 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,459 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,458 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,461 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,463 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,468 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,471 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,459 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,449 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,445 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,439 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,445 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,446 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,442 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,443 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,435 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,438 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,434 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,433 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,430 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,422 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,416 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,414 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,403 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,402 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,360 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,330 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,299 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,279 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,280 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,276 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,277 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,271 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,269 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,260 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,259 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,252 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,247 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,244 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,235 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,240 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,237 subscribers11,23711 August 202627 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 77 days, net -219. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,200–11,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 05:2611,237-3
26 Oct 2026, 04:4911,240+5
25 Oct 2026, 02:5611,235-9
24 Oct 2026, 01:0711,244-3
22 Oct 2026, 22:1011,247-5
21 Oct 2026, 16:1811,252-7
20 Oct 2026, 12:3611,259-1
19 Oct 2026, 14:1611,260-9
18 Oct 2026, 15:4811,269-2
17 Oct 2026, 15:4711,271-6
16 Oct 2026, 14:2811,277+1
15 Oct 2026, 17:2811,276-4
14 Oct 2026, 18:4911,280+1
13 Oct 2026, 08:2811,279-20
9 Oct 2026, 02:1511,299-31
4 Oct 2026, 14:1711,330-30
26 Sept 2026, 04:4111,360-42
17 Sept 2026, 12:3811,402-1
15 Sept 2026, 13:5711,403-11
13 Sept 2026, 19:1911,414first reading

Engagement

212 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 212 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 80 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6543.0%
👍5234.4%
🔥1811.9%
❤‍🔥53.31%
👏21.32%
💔21.32%
💯21.32%
😁21.32%
🥰21.32%
🤣10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 212 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC125 viewsread 3 September 2026

עا حسافهه ولا ندم ؏ خࢪب مكانتهه بنفسهه😩🔥.

2 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC124 viewsread 3 September 2026

ﭑذا ڪﭑن ﭑݪشيطـَﭑن معݪمڪم فهو تݪميذيَ..🦦.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC127 viewsread 3 September 2026

حقـكم تكـࢪهـوني لأ‎טּ حضـوࢪي يلغي وجودڪم😂😉.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC127 viewsread 3 September 2026

اني منہَ انشࢪ قصف ما اكتب مقصود لأ‎טּ كلامي يندل دࢪبه😉🐍.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC128 viewsread 3 September 2026

تࢪقبو لتحديث لجديد كلكم بࢪا حياتي 😂🔥.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC128 viewsread 3 September 2026

ليحس بنات لناس لعبهه اكيد اختهه بليستيشن حديث😂😩.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC126 viewsread 3 September 2026

مو متكبࢪه بس انتو مو مال حتࢪام😉😂.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC119 viewsread 3 September 2026

محد يسࢪق شخص منہَ شخص هوة لࢪخيص كلهة تجيب ࢪاسهه😩😂.

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC116 viewsread 3 September 2026

شبيج دوࢪين وࢪاي وتاࢪكه عيوبج🙂😩؟

1 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC268 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

أنت تحتاج رد لو تحتاج إعادة تشغيل؟ 😭🔥

1 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC267 viewsread 3 September 2026

الثقة عندك فول، بس الإنجاز بطارية فارغة.

Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @QG_QC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@QG_QC edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

نرجع ننشر؟

  1. اي78%
  2. لاا22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

‏ْ عبارات فخمه 𖣣🖤
@xvx94 · 30,029
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
قصف جبهات عبارات ❤️‍🔥🐍
@gkr41 · 20,881
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عبارات قصف ستوريات‏ 𖣣🖤” (@QG_QC), 11,237 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QG_QC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.